Sometimes it isn't about making things better for their own kids, but rather making things worse for everyone else. |
I'm this pp, and the point of these lessons is that they're review. This may not work for K, but for third-grade-plus, why could a kid not take out worksheets on something they learned three months before, and work on them independently? A set of math problems to reinforce what they learned before? Just as an example, you take math skills learned throughout fall semester and make them worksheets that they do for practice. If the kid returns them to the teacher the next week and clearly struggled, then the teacher has learned something about needing to review. Otherwise, the kid has gotten reinforcement on something taught earlier in the year. A better choice for the little kids would also be Khan Academy, since every lesson has videos to watch if you forgot how to do the task. But there seems to be a problem requiring computer work with the Littles, so this would be second-best. (Maybe the assignments could be set up as either/or.) And yes, I'm a parent. And at a young age, my kids sat independently doing Khan Academy and workbooks and puzzles. (And to the critics, yes they also went sledding and played with toys and played a ton of sports). The parent doesn't need to be able to teach the kid these lessons, but they do need to be able to set them at a table for 30 minute stints to work on homework. |
You said it would be for remedial instruction. How do you expect teachers to help kids who don't know the material when they can't see what they're doing? And when the kids can't articulate questions? |
Here come the bigotry of low expectations folks. |
More like the McPS staffers who don’t want their extra snow day vacation interrupted when they can just throw on videos for a half day in June. |