Be mindful of what you post — Employer could be watching

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is some website that is aggregating all posts from people who are ‘celebrating’ his death and posting their names and employers.

Here is a link to the site https://www.charliesmurderers.com/

I wonder if someone is going to end up suing Squarespace Inc. into bankruptcy over that.

Why? I would think those posters would be proud of their words.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was okay when the Westboro Baptist people slandered and taunted and celebrated kids and others who were killed though, right?

The right routinely made fun of Westboro Baptist. Even Breitbart never supported them. Get a clue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was okay when the Westboro Baptist people slandered and taunted and celebrated kids and others who were killed though, right?

The right routinely made fun of Westboro Baptist. Even Breitbart never supported them. Get a clue.

No the right is Westboro Baptist. There is no difference and never has been.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was okay when the Westboro Baptist people slandered and taunted and celebrated kids and others who were killed though, right?

The right routinely made fun of Westboro Baptist. Even Breitbart never supported them. Get a clue.

No the right is Westboro Baptist. There is no difference and never has been.

And herein lies the left's problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is some website that is aggregating all posts from people who are ‘celebrating’ his death and posting their names and employers.

Here is a link to the site https://www.charliesmurderers.com/

lol I’ve been submitting edited social media posts of MAGA people I know. This dumb website will post anything, no fact checking

Hopefully they get sued to oblivion shortly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fema-employee-placed-leave-saying-flags-shouldnt-half-staff-racist-homophobe-charlie-kirk

I’m a little curious if his boss was a Instagram friend? Did it go viral? How did it get to the attention of decision makers.

But be careful and thoughtful of what you post. I was not a fan of Kirk, but those are harsh words for a murdered young father.

Why is it sadder when a parent dies?

Because another person will be hurt?

I wonder if it makes non-parents feel less than?

[Anonymous]

What’s crazy to me is that Charlie Kirk claim to fame was all about free speech. And catching people for their own free speech seems pretty hypocritical to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What’s crazy to me is that Charlie Kirk claim to fame was all about free speech. And catching people for their own free speech seems pretty hypocritical to me.

He was a hypocrite about that, too. That’s why he had the professor hit lists.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is some website that is aggregating all posts from people who are ‘celebrating’ his death and posting their names and employers.

Here is a link to the site https://www.charliesmurderers.com/

I wonder if someone is going to end up suing Squarespace Inc. into bankruptcy over that.

Why? I would think those posters would be proud of their words.

You’d think that Charlie Kirk supporters would be proud of his words, but a lot of them seem to hate it when you quote what he actually said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is some website that is aggregating all posts from people who are ‘celebrating’ his death and posting their names and employers.

Good.

Why is this good?

It’s fine, and justifies sites like the ICE list, but why do you think that it’s good?

Would you also think it’s good if we start aggregating the people that ramble on about leftists, like a maga-watch site? For example, to make sure that they aren’t teaching children?

You have lost your moral compass if you are celebrating anyone’s death. Where is your humanity?

You can disagree with someone’s politics and not celebrate a violent murder?
You’ve lost the plot line.
If you are that far gone, no one can help.

I’m the person who posted earlier being left partyless. I cannot condone anyone who is celebrating this. I didn’t even know who this guy was beforehand. I don’t follow him. I don’t agree with what I have now seen that he’s said.

But I absolutely would never support or applaud anyone who was celebrating his death in such a violent manner. Their consequences to all actions. You should be held accountable. For your speech too.

Your lack of moral consistency is stunning. Charlie Kirk was despicable and peddled in hate. Most people aren't celebrating his death, they are merely pointing out the sad irony that a despicable person died as a result of the environment he helped create. But even if they are celebrating, that's not a crime, and Charlie Kirk advocated for the right to say despicable things.

So why all the pearl clutching? You can not like it. I didn't like most of what Charlie Kirk had to say. But it wasn't a crime when he did it, and it's not a crime for people to see whatever they want to in his death. You can't mandate people's feelings.

Is there any famous conservative person who you do not think is despicable and a peddler of hate?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is some website that is aggregating all posts from people who are ‘celebrating’ his death and posting their names and employers.

Good.

Why is this good?

It’s fine, and justifies sites like the ICE list, but why do you think that it’s good?

Would you also think it’s good if we start aggregating the people that ramble on about leftists, like a maga-watch site? For example, to make sure that they aren’t teaching children?

You have lost your moral compass if you are celebrating anyone’s death. Where is your humanity?

You can disagree with someone’s politics and not celebrate a violent murder?
You’ve lost the plot line.
If you are that far gone, no one can help.

I’m the person who posted earlier being left partyless. I cannot condone anyone who is celebrating this. I didn’t even know who this guy was beforehand. I don’t follow him. I don’t agree with what I have now seen that he’s said.

But I absolutely would never support or applaud anyone who was celebrating his death in such a violent manner. Their consequences to all actions. You should be held accountable. For your speech too.

Clearly you haven’t looked at the site. By and large it’s not people celebrating his death. The first post is from a Canadian expressing concern over the far right using this as an excuse to retaliate with more violence. Please explain how that is “celebrating”? And yeah there are some tasteless comments like “is the gun ok.” Some people just flat out call him a racist and misogynist (which can’t say I disagree with).

But rounding people up on a list because they say something you don’t like is legitimate insanity. This isn’t a list of people calling for violence. It’s a list of people who don’t like Charlie Kirk, which last time I checked is not illegal.

[Anonymous]

The right: the left is violent and responsible for the murder of Charlie Kirk! They’ve declared civil war on us and we have the right to respond with violence! In America we have free speech and he was simply exercising his right to engage in discourse!

The right, once they learned that the shooter was MAGA: compile a list of anyone who directly quotes Charlie Kirk or has anything other than blind reverence for him. They should be harassed and fired for being mean to us!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What’s crazy to me is that Charlie Kirk claim to fame was all about free speech. And catching people for their own free speech seems pretty hypocritical to me.

In Kirk’s name free speech is no loner allowed unless you are parroting approved right wing propaganda.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s crazy to me is that Charlie Kirk claim to fame was all about free speech. And catching people for their own free speech seems pretty hypocritical to me.

In Kirk’s name free speech is no loner allowed unless you are parroting approved right wing propaganda.

And Charlie himself was guilty of “free speech for me but not for thee”. He blocked people who criticized him online and created a list of professors whose speech he took issue with.

He radicalized a lot of kids and did a lot of harm. We can be honest about that even though he was senselessly nurdered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is some website that is aggregating all posts from people who are ‘celebrating’ his death and posting their names and employers.

Good.

Why is this good?

It’s fine, and justifies sites like the ICE list, but why do you think that it’s good?

Would you also think it’s good if we start aggregating the people that ramble on about leftists, like a maga-watch site? For example, to make sure that they aren’t teaching children?

You have lost your moral compass if you are celebrating anyone’s death. Where is your humanity?

You can disagree with someone’s politics and not celebrate a violent murder?
You’ve lost the plot line.
If you are that far gone, no one can help.

I’m the person who posted earlier being left partyless. I cannot condone anyone who is celebrating this. I didn’t even know who this guy was beforehand. I don’t follow him. I don’t agree with what I have now seen that he’s said.

But I absolutely would never support or applaud anyone who was celebrating his death in such a violent manner. Their consequences to all actions. You should be held accountable. For your speech too.

Your lack of moral consistency is stunning. Charlie Kirk was despicable and peddled in hate. Most people aren't celebrating his death, they are merely pointing out the sad irony that a despicable person died as a result of the environment he helped create. But even if they are celebrating, that's not a crime, and Charlie Kirk advocated for the right to say despicable things.

So why all the pearl clutching? You can not like it. I didn't like most of what Charlie Kirk had to say. But it wasn't a crime when he did it, and it's not a crime for people to see whatever they want to in his death. You can't mandate people's feelings.

Is there any famous conservative person who you do not think is despicable and a peddler of hate?

NP. I seriously doubt that PP even listened to him. PP doesn't seem to be the type of audience attracted to his podcasts and debates. That's the thing. How many people who do not subscribe to his ideology were actively listening to him debate? How many people who posted truly hateful videos were his audience?