Medical schools aren’t doing squat about the shortage except maybe increasing their class size by a few or establishing tiny “satellite” campuses to pretend they care about rural medicine. No, they are reveling in the exclusivity too while raking in thousands in secondary application fees and making applicants jump through more and more hoops. They are too lazy and set in their ways to take on more students. They just want to keep phoning it in with pre-recorded lectures and group case presentations where the students teach themselves. And they fall back on the congressional residency cap to justify their actions. They also fight any attempt to build new med schools in the states where they are located so that they have less competition. |
Physicians are obligated to follow established protocols. You say your symptoms, and they prescribe the meds. AI can do that. Who needs a real human? |
OK. You first. |
I already do heal myself if I feel anything coming on. You need to do your own research. |
OK, Jesus. ![]() |
Self responsibility is rare. |
Go away troll. Are you sick enough to believe that 3 year olds get leukemia because they don’t have enough “self responsibility” or engage in “healing themselves?” |
I have a relative who's a specialist who works only several days per week. And gets 8 weeks of paid vacation on top of that. Until recently it was 12 weeks. Insane. |
There are plenty of capable Americans who want to be doctors, but there aren't enough med school spots to train them. We desperately need more med school capacity. |
What do you mean no one wants a single payer? I want a single payer system! Lots and lots of people want a single payer system. |
Sorry, but you're an idiot. That's not in the Hippocratic oath. Look it up. Promising not to cut out kidney stones is a part of it, as it promising to teach the practice of medicine for free to the sons of your teachers,. but that's not what you are calling on. You don't even know what it states as an oath. |
You're wrong in a fundamental way, at least unless you expand on that. Med school isn't the problem. You can always hire somebody to teach more classes. It's the clinical placements that are not available, and that is a LOT more difficult to fix (if not impossible). Clinical teaching requires multiple people to integrate a learner into a space which is increasingly profit-driven, corners-cutting, and pressed for time. There are even more people needing appointments, and fewer providers, and those providers still working are being tracked for spending too much time with patients as it is. So you just have the learner see patients without full supervision? Not with increasing malpractice and liability legislation. Not without loosening the stringency of holding a medical license, where mistakes or errors will literally follow you forever, even if you change states. And that's fine, but what is the incentive (or even justification) for taking on teaching in that environment? "We don't have enough medical school slots." No. That's not the problem. --- PS: This is one of the reasons NP diploma mills are so crappy. They often require theNP students to find their own clinical training placements. NOBODY wants them. Why would you, in this context? It's a huge liability and makes a difficult job even worse. |
The main bottleneck is in residency slots. You can build all the med schools you want, but that doesn't make a difference if someone cannot complete their training. Residency spots are largely federally funded, and Congress needs to provide more funding for this. |
You are fetishizing a black-and-white statement from back when there wasn't even reliable antibiotics or routinely survivable surgeries. Look at what you want: "FIRST DO NO HARM." That's NO harm, not just "justified" harm, or "a small amount of harm for great reward." It's NO harm. No medications with any side effects at all? No CT scans? No general anesthesia, even for an infant with a brain tumor? No surgeries at all? No chemotherapy? I can see why you find modern medicine distasteful. Unfortunately, balancing benefits and risks doesn't fit in the tiny little sentence from the (other, not the oath) writings of Hippocrates back around 400 years BC. |
13:20 is a quack. |