Liam Neeson and Pam Anderson are dating

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think her son has helped her reinvent herself.

Her sons look like white trash.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think her son has helped her reinvent herself.

Her sons look like white trash.

So

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:True or not, I think they are both enjoying their lives and I’m happy for them.

Pam seems to have truly transformed as a person. She is happy in her own skin.

Transformed?

I mean, she’s always been pretty amazing. She refused to be paid less than other actors in misfired from Tim the tool time Taylor.

She fell in love with one person and had two kids with them, ended up sucking, but she didn’t.

I’m not sure what she had to transform from? She’s always been smart, loving, kind.

Why is Pamela pretty amazing? Has she spoken out in her part in creating and upholding unrealistic beauty and body standards for women?

Yes, she has. She has bought for pay and got fired for it.

You only know the character of her from her roles?

Talks about recovering from childhood sexual abuse. She talks about her sex, tape being stolen and sold.

She was a Broadway actress after Baywatch.

She’s actually extremely private person and she rarely wears make up.

She only has the huge boobs from 1991-1999. Then they were removed.

Nothing you wrote suggests that she has publicly acknowledged her role in perpetuating an unrealistic standard of beauty.

Because she didn’t, but she does talk about how she was exploded, and that those people perpetuated an unrealistic standard.

She talks about how sexual abuse had informed some bad decisions and how she reclaimed ownership of her own body.

You should watch her documentary.

Being pretty and wearing a bathing suit does not perpetuate an unrealistic standard of beauty.

Just because somebody makes you feel insecure about your body doesn’t mean they’re perpetuating something.

Is that all she did? Be pretty and wear a bathing suit? Sounds like she spent a long time explaining how she was done wrong but no time on why she may have done young girls wrong. Got it.

Your so 2000 late!

No, her alleged transformation into natural no makeup lady is recent.

DP but not exactly. She just wasn't in the public eye. She's been at home gardening for like 20 years, and adopted a more low maintenance style many years ago, but only when she made The Last Showgirl and did press for that did it become a "statement" because she didn't glam back up for red carpets but instead stuck with what felt authentic to her now.

It's not like she's been doing press annually for various movies and shows for decades and then suddenly decided to change it up. It's just that you haven't seen her since her Baywatch days so it feels sudden to you.

Wouldn't it actually be weirder if she was still working the same look as back in her bombshell days despite being out of the industry and leading a totally different life?

DP. There's a middle ground between plastering on the makeup and wearing none at all. She would look better with a little makeup. She even looks uncomfortable without it. I think it would give her more confidence.

+1 she looks tired and old.

I’m sure she gives a sh&t what you think.

You seem unbelievably triggered that we think she'd look much better with a little makeup. Try to get a grip.

You seem unbelievably triggered that somebody doesn’t care what you think about her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:True or not, I think they are both enjoying their lives and I’m happy for them.

Pam seems to have truly transformed as a person. She is happy in her own skin.

Transformed?

I mean, she’s always been pretty amazing. She refused to be paid less than other actors in misfired from Tim the tool time Taylor.

She fell in love with one person and had two kids with them, ended up sucking, but she didn’t.

I’m not sure what she had to transform from? She’s always been smart, loving, kind.

Why is Pamela pretty amazing? Has she spoken out in her part in creating and upholding unrealistic beauty and body standards for women?

Yes, she has. She has bought for pay and got fired for it.

You only know the character of her from her roles?

Talks about recovering from childhood sexual abuse. She talks about her sex, tape being stolen and sold.

She was a Broadway actress after Baywatch.

She’s actually extremely private person and she rarely wears make up.

She only has the huge boobs from 1991-1999. Then they were removed.

Nothing you wrote suggests that she has publicly acknowledged her role in perpetuating an unrealistic standard of beauty.

Because she didn’t, but she does talk about how she was exploded, and that those people perpetuated an unrealistic standard.

She talks about how sexual abuse had informed some bad decisions and how she reclaimed ownership of her own body.

You should watch her documentary.

Being pretty and wearing a bathing suit does not perpetuate an unrealistic standard of beauty.

Just because somebody makes you feel insecure about your body doesn’t mean they’re perpetuating something.

Is that all she did? Be pretty and wear a bathing suit? Sounds like she spent a long time explaining how she was done wrong but no time on why she may have done young girls wrong. Got it.

Your so 2000 late!

No, her alleged transformation into natural no makeup lady is recent.

DP but not exactly. She just wasn't in the public eye. She's been at home gardening for like 20 years, and adopted a more low maintenance style many years ago, but only when she made The Last Showgirl and did press for that did it become a "statement" because she didn't glam back up for red carpets but instead stuck with what felt authentic to her now.

It's not like she's been doing press annually for various movies and shows for decades and then suddenly decided to change it up. It's just that you haven't seen her since her Baywatch days so it feels sudden to you.

Wouldn't it actually be weirder if she was still working the same look as back in her bombshell days despite being out of the industry and leading a totally different life?

DP. There's a middle ground between plastering on the makeup and wearing none at all. She would look better with a little makeup. She even looks uncomfortable without it. I think it would give her more confidence.

+1 she looks tired and old.

I’m sure she gives a sh&t what you think.

You seem unbelievably triggered that we think she'd look much better with a little makeup. Try to get a grip.

Go ahead and wear as much makeup as you want. She has explained why she doesn't want to bother with it anymore.

Goodness. No one is making her do anything. We're simply commenting on her choice, which we're allowed to do. I'm sure you comment on people in the public eye all the time.

It takes time and money and she said she doesn't want to do that with her time and money anymore. She explained that she's more interested in other things. Seems pretty reasonable to me, but go ahead and make your comments.

She’s in the wrong line of work if she really believes that.

Clearly not because she is promoting a movie and you are posting on DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Did anyone see what Janice Dickenson said about him?

Hung like a donkey apparently

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone see what Janice Dickenson said about him?

Hung like a donkey apparently

She’s a drunk. Doubt she’s seen his donkey d@ck.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:True or not, I think they are both enjoying their lives and I’m happy for them.

Pam seems to have truly transformed as a person. She is happy in her own skin.

Transformed?

I mean, she’s always been pretty amazing. She refused to be paid less than other actors in misfired from Tim the tool time Taylor.

She fell in love with one person and had two kids with them, ended up sucking, but she didn’t.

I’m not sure what she had to transform from? She’s always been smart, loving, kind.

Why is Pamela pretty amazing? Has she spoken out in her part in creating and upholding unrealistic beauty and body standards for women?

Yes, she has. She has bought for pay and got fired for it.

You only know the character of her from her roles?

Talks about recovering from childhood sexual abuse. She talks about her sex, tape being stolen and sold.

She was a Broadway actress after Baywatch.

She’s actually extremely private person and she rarely wears make up.

She only has the huge boobs from 1991-1999. Then they were removed.

Nothing you wrote suggests that she has publicly acknowledged her role in perpetuating an unrealistic standard of beauty.

Because she didn’t, but she does talk about how she was exploded, and that those people perpetuated an unrealistic standard.

She talks about how sexual abuse had informed some bad decisions and how she reclaimed ownership of her own body.

You should watch her documentary.

Being pretty and wearing a bathing suit does not perpetuate an unrealistic standard of beauty.

Just because somebody makes you feel insecure about your body doesn’t mean they’re perpetuating something.

Is that all she did? Be pretty and wear a bathing suit? Sounds like she spent a long time explaining how she was done wrong but no time on why she may have done young girls wrong. Got it.

Your so 2000 late!

No, her alleged transformation into natural no makeup lady is recent.

DP but not exactly. She just wasn't in the public eye. She's been at home gardening for like 20 years, and adopted a more low maintenance style many years ago, but only when she made The Last Showgirl and did press for that did it become a "statement" because she didn't glam back up for red carpets but instead stuck with what felt authentic to her now.

It's not like she's been doing press annually for various movies and shows for decades and then suddenly decided to change it up. It's just that you haven't seen her since her Baywatch days so it feels sudden to you.

Wouldn't it actually be weirder if she was still working the same look as back in her bombshell days despite being out of the industry and leading a totally different life?

DP. There's a middle ground between plastering on the makeup and wearing none at all. She would look better with a little makeup. She even looks uncomfortable without it. I think it would give her more confidence.

+1 she looks tired and old.

I’m sure she gives a sh&t what you think.

You seem unbelievably triggered that we think she'd look much better with a little makeup. Try to get a grip.

NP. +1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:True or not, I think they are both enjoying their lives and I’m happy for them.

Pam seems to have truly transformed as a person. She is happy in her own skin.

Transformed?

I mean, she’s always been pretty amazing. She refused to be paid less than other actors in misfired from Tim the tool time Taylor.

She fell in love with one person and had two kids with them, ended up sucking, but she didn’t.

I’m not sure what she had to transform from? She’s always been smart, loving, kind.

Why is Pamela pretty amazing? Has she spoken out in her part in creating and upholding unrealistic beauty and body standards for women?

Yes, she has. She has bought for pay and got fired for it.

You only know the character of her from her roles?

Talks about recovering from childhood sexual abuse. She talks about her sex, tape being stolen and sold.

She was a Broadway actress after Baywatch.

She’s actually extremely private person and she rarely wears make up.

She only has the huge boobs from 1991-1999. Then they were removed.

Nothing you wrote suggests that she has publicly acknowledged her role in perpetuating an unrealistic standard of beauty.

Because she didn’t, but she does talk about how she was exploded, and that those people perpetuated an unrealistic standard.

She talks about how sexual abuse had informed some bad decisions and how she reclaimed ownership of her own body.

You should watch her documentary.

Being pretty and wearing a bathing suit does not perpetuate an unrealistic standard of beauty.

Just because somebody makes you feel insecure about your body doesn’t mean they’re perpetuating something.

Is that all she did? Be pretty and wear a bathing suit? Sounds like she spent a long time explaining how she was done wrong but no time on why she may have done young girls wrong. Got it.

Your so 2000 late!

No, her alleged transformation into natural no makeup lady is recent.

DP but not exactly. She just wasn't in the public eye. She's been at home gardening for like 20 years, and adopted a more low maintenance style many years ago, but only when she made The Last Showgirl and did press for that did it become a "statement" because she didn't glam back up for red carpets but instead stuck with what felt authentic to her now.

It's not like she's been doing press annually for various movies and shows for decades and then suddenly decided to change it up. It's just that you haven't seen her since her Baywatch days so it feels sudden to you.

Wouldn't it actually be weirder if she was still working the same look as back in her bombshell days despite being out of the industry and leading a totally different life?

DP. There's a middle ground between plastering on the makeup and wearing none at all. She would look better with a little makeup. She even looks uncomfortable without it. I think it would give her more confidence.

+1 she looks tired and old.

I’m sure she gives a sh&t what you think.

You seem unbelievably triggered that we think she'd look much better with a little makeup. Try to get a grip.

Go ahead and wear as much makeup as you want. She has explained why she doesn't want to bother with it anymore.

Goodness. No one is making her do anything. We're simply commenting on her choice, which we're allowed to do. I'm sure you comment on people in the public eye all the time.

It takes time and money and she said she doesn't want to do that with her time and money anymore. She explained that she's more interested in other things. Seems pretty reasonable to me, but go ahead and make your comments.

She’s in the wrong line of work if she really believes that.

Clearly not because she is promoting a movie and you are posting on DCUM.

Are a believer that all comments are good comments?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She’s in the wrong line of work if she really believes that.

And yet, she's more popular than ever now isn't she?

No, she’s not more popular than the red bathing suit Baywatch days. It’s clear that you, however, are some kind of nutso fan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone see what Janice Dickenson said about him?

Hung like a donkey apparently

She’s a drunk. Doubt she’s seen his donkey d@ck.

She has more than seen it. THey had an affair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:True or not, I think they are both enjoying their lives and I’m happy for them.

Pam seems to have truly transformed as a person. She is happy in her own skin.

Transformed?

I mean, she’s always been pretty amazing. She refused to be paid less than other actors in misfired from Tim the tool time Taylor.

She fell in love with one person and had two kids with them, ended up sucking, but she didn’t.

I’m not sure what she had to transform from? She’s always been smart, loving, kind.

Why is Pamela pretty amazing? Has she spoken out in her part in creating and upholding unrealistic beauty and body standards for women?

Yes, she has. She has bought for pay and got fired for it.

You only know the character of her from her roles?

Talks about recovering from childhood sexual abuse. She talks about her sex, tape being stolen and sold.

She was a Broadway actress after Baywatch.

She’s actually extremely private person and she rarely wears make up.

She only has the huge boobs from 1991-1999. Then they were removed.

Nothing you wrote suggests that she has publicly acknowledged her role in perpetuating an unrealistic standard of beauty.

Because she didn’t, but she does talk about how she was exploded, and that those people perpetuated an unrealistic standard.

She talks about how sexual abuse had informed some bad decisions and how she reclaimed ownership of her own body.

You should watch her documentary.

Being pretty and wearing a bathing suit does not perpetuate an unrealistic standard of beauty.

Just because somebody makes you feel insecure about your body doesn’t mean they’re perpetuating something.

Is that all she did? Be pretty and wear a bathing suit? Sounds like she spent a long time explaining how she was done wrong but no time on why she may have done young girls wrong. Got it.

Your so 2000 late!

No, her alleged transformation into natural no makeup lady is recent.

DP but not exactly. She just wasn't in the public eye. She's been at home gardening for like 20 years, and adopted a more low maintenance style many years ago, but only when she made The Last Showgirl and did press for that did it become a "statement" because she didn't glam back up for red carpets but instead stuck with what felt authentic to her now.

It's not like she's been doing press annually for various movies and shows for decades and then suddenly decided to change it up. It's just that you haven't seen her since her Baywatch days so it feels sudden to you.

Wouldn't it actually be weirder if she was still working the same look as back in her bombshell days despite being out of the industry and leading a totally different life?

DP. There's a middle ground between plastering on the makeup and wearing none at all. She would look better with a little makeup. She even looks uncomfortable without it. I think it would give her more confidence.

+1 she looks tired and old.

I’m sure she gives a sh&t what you think.

You seem unbelievably triggered that we think she'd look much better with a little makeup. Try to get a grip.

Go ahead and wear as much makeup as you want. She has explained why she doesn't want to bother with it anymore.

Goodness. No one is making her do anything. We're simply commenting on her choice, which we're allowed to do. I'm sure you comment on people in the public eye all the time.

It takes time and money and she said she doesn't want to do that with her time and money anymore. She explained that she's more interested in other things. Seems pretty reasonable to me, but go ahead and make your comments.

Yes, I will. Thank you for your permission to do so! And swiping on a little mascara isn’t something that takes time or money.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is the strangest pairing.

Also, I find her no makeup wearing as bad as when she plastered it on. She's so attention seeking. Oh, look at me, I don't wear makeup - I'm a serious actress now! It's like when someone puts on dark framed glasses to appear studious.

Exactly this. It’s jarring, just like the horrible look she used to sport. Surely there’s a middle ground…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

She’s in the wrong line of work if she really believes that.

And yet, she's more popular than ever now isn't she?

Not really. She’s just being talked about because she’s promoting a movie and looking awful while doing so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:True or not, I think they are both enjoying their lives and I’m happy for them.

Pam seems to have truly transformed as a person. She is happy in her own skin.

Transformed?

I mean, she’s always been pretty amazing. She refused to be paid less than other actors in misfired from Tim the tool time Taylor.

She fell in love with one person and had two kids with them, ended up sucking, but she didn’t.

I’m not sure what she had to transform from? She’s always been smart, loving, kind.

Why is Pamela pretty amazing? Has she spoken out in her part in creating and upholding unrealistic beauty and body standards for women?

Yes, she has. She has bought for pay and got fired for it.

You only know the character of her from her roles?

Talks about recovering from childhood sexual abuse. She talks about her sex, tape being stolen and sold.

She was a Broadway actress after Baywatch.

She’s actually extremely private person and she rarely wears make up.

She only has the huge boobs from 1991-1999. Then they were removed.

Nothing you wrote suggests that she has publicly acknowledged her role in perpetuating an unrealistic standard of beauty.

Because she didn’t, but she does talk about how she was exploded, and that those people perpetuated an unrealistic standard.

She talks about how sexual abuse had informed some bad decisions and how she reclaimed ownership of her own body.

You should watch her documentary.

Being pretty and wearing a bathing suit does not perpetuate an unrealistic standard of beauty.

Just because somebody makes you feel insecure about your body doesn’t mean they’re perpetuating something.

Is that all she did? Be pretty and wear a bathing suit? Sounds like she spent a long time explaining how she was done wrong but no time on why she may have done young girls wrong. Got it.

Your so 2000 late!

No, her alleged transformation into natural no makeup lady is recent.

DP but not exactly. She just wasn't in the public eye. She's been at home gardening for like 20 years, and adopted a more low maintenance style many years ago, but only when she made The Last Showgirl and did press for that did it become a "statement" because she didn't glam back up for red carpets but instead stuck with what felt authentic to her now.

It's not like she's been doing press annually for various movies and shows for decades and then suddenly decided to change it up. It's just that you haven't seen her since her Baywatch days so it feels sudden to you.

Wouldn't it actually be weirder if she was still working the same look as back in her bombshell days despite being out of the industry and leading a totally different life?

DP. There's a middle ground between plastering on the makeup and wearing none at all. She would look better with a little makeup. She even looks uncomfortable without it. I think it would give her more confidence.

+1 she looks tired and old.

I’m sure she gives a sh&t what you think.

You seem unbelievably triggered that we think she'd look much better with a little makeup. Try to get a grip.

You seem unbelievably triggered that somebody doesn’t care what you think about her.

You’re proving my point with every overly-defensive post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone see what Janice Dickenson said about him?

Hung like a donkey apparently

She’s a drunk. Doubt she’s seen his donkey d@ck.

She has more than seen it. THey had an affair.

A woman who talks about a guy’s junk is low class.