I have never seen a tall couple … tall men really like short woman huh

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a 5’8 woman I dated men from 5’9 to 6’4. While most of my dates were over 6’, I feel most comfortable when he’s 5’11-6’. I don’t know what you are talking about sex: it’s great when we can do it standing in the shower with me just wrapping my leg around him, being about same level. My legs are long and mens legs shorter so my P is right at the level of his D. I also don’t like to stretch my neck too much to kiss, better if we are about same level. Also men like to f..k with my legs on his shoulders. Some munch on my toes in the process….
I’m thin and very feminine, round butt and large tits but looking narrower than most shorter women, and way smaller than most men.
OP has weird agenda against tall women

To add, I also look very petite when sitting next to shorter women and have thin ankles, tiny hands with longer thin fingers and size 8 shoe with narrow feminine feet. Men tell me I’m the most proportional woman they’ve ever seen when I get undressed, and a sex bomb. Shorter women who are wider than me look more masculine and “square”, but that’s just my opinion

I think the issue is that so many women and men are overweight in the US. If I was not in the “thin” category, I would have looked totally different

You’re delusional

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a classic example of internal mysogeny lol. If you anonymously ask women whether they would rather be short or tall you know the answer. They have bought into the idea that men should be the taller ones stronger ones. I am 6'3 and my wife is 6'1. Personally I don't see any difference as far as attractiveness between a short and tall woman. And women are already considered tall when they are 5'8 sometimes even 5'7. Crazy

And what is the 'universal' answer? I an short woman and if I could be taller I would want that.

Most women would rather be short than tall. Of course now they will say the opposite lol.

I don't think most women would want to be 6'2, but I also think they'd rather be 5'9 than 5'0. I know I would. I'm 5'5 and would be thrilled to take 3 more inches taller but pissed to go 3 inches shorter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a 5’8 woman I dated men from 5’9 to 6’4. While most of my dates were over 6’, I feel most comfortable when he’s 5’11-6’. I don’t know what you are talking about sex: it’s great when we can do it standing in the shower with me just wrapping my leg around him, being about same level. My legs are long and mens legs shorter so my P is right at the level of his D. I also don’t like to stretch my neck too much to kiss, better if we are about same level. Also men like to f..k with my legs on his shoulders. Some munch on my toes in the process….
I’m thin and very feminine, round butt and large tits but looking narrower than most shorter women, and way smaller than most men.
OP has weird agenda against tall women

To add, I also look very petite when sitting next to shorter women and have thin ankles, tiny hands with longer thin fingers and size 8 shoe with narrow feminine feet. Men tell me I’m the most proportional woman they’ve ever seen when I get undressed, and a sex bomb. Shorter women who are wider than me look more masculine and “square”, but that’s just my opinion

I think the issue is that so many women and men are overweight in the US. If I was not in the “thin” category, I would have looked totally different

You’re delusional

I have an Asian friend she’s 5’1 and she’s used for sex by 6’+ men. They would pump and dump her. She’s single for 15 years post divorce. Women are delusional about reasons why these tall guys are asking them out. Men marry or develop relationships with the likes but date for sex

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a classic example of internal mysogeny lol. If you anonymously ask women whether they would rather be short or tall you know the answer. They have bought into the idea that men should be the taller ones stronger ones. I am 6'3 and my wife is 6'1. Personally I don't see any difference as far as attractiveness between a short and tall woman. And women are already considered tall when they are 5'8 sometimes even 5'7. Crazy

And what is the 'universal' answer? I an short woman and if I could be taller I would want that.

Most women would rather be short than tall. Of course now they will say the opposite lol.

A man must be writing this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually 5 ft 3.5 in

If you're white it's more like 5'5-5'6.

no, it's not.

Ethnicity Mean Height in Inches Mean Height in Centimeters
Non-Hispanic White 63.9 in (5 ft 3.9 in) 162.4 cm
Non-Hispanic Black 64 in (5 ft 4 in) 162.5 cm
Non-Hispanic Asian 61.5 in (5 ft 1.5 in) 156.3 cm
Hispanic 62 in (5 ft 2 in) 157.5 cm
Mexican American 61.7 in (5 ft 1.7 in) 156.8 cm

https://www.verywellfit.com/average-height-for-a-woman-statistics-2632136

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a 5’8 woman I dated men from 5’9 to 6’4. While most of my dates were over 6’, I feel most comfortable when he’s 5’11-6’. I don’t know what you are talking about sex: it’s great when we can do it standing in the shower with me just wrapping my leg around him, being about same level. My legs are long and mens legs shorter so my P is right at the level of his D. I also don’t like to stretch my neck too much to kiss, better if we are about same level. Also men like to f..k with my legs on his shoulders. Some munch on my toes in the process….
I’m thin and very feminine, round butt and large tits but looking narrower than most shorter women, and way smaller than most men.
OP has weird agenda against tall women

To add, I also look very petite when sitting next to shorter women and have thin ankles, tiny hands with longer thin fingers and size 8 shoe with narrow feminine feet. Men tell me I’m the most proportional woman they’ve ever seen when I get undressed, and a sex bomb. Shorter women who are wider than me look more masculine and “square”, but that’s just my opinion

I think the issue is that so many women and men are overweight in the US. If I was not in the “thin” category, I would have looked totally different

You’re delusional

I have an Asian friend she’s 5’1 and she’s used for sex by 6’+ men. They would pump and dump her. She’s single for 15 years post divorce. Women are delusional about reasons why these tall guys are asking them out. Men marry or develop relationships with the likes but date for sex

? There are plenty of short Asian women married to tall men who have been married for 10+ years. I'm one of them, as is my friend. Goodness.

The issue is your friend, not her height or her race.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most attractive couples have a height difference of a few inches. I’m sure it doesn’t matter to the 5’1” and 6’3” happy couples, but they do look like clowns.

And no, I’m not an angry tall woman. I’m 5’3” and won’t date a man taller than 5’9” because I like the comfort and look of symmetry.

'Clowns? You aren't a nice person

I’m a tall 5’8 woman and 6’3-6’4 feels waaay too tall of a man for me ! I don’t know why a 5’1-5’3 woman would need someone that tall to feel attractive, unless she or he has a weird fetish…
Men are often overweight or more muscular than women. I’m thin and was getting back and neck pains when I was “pounded” by super tall guys if he’s on top of me. Men are often clumsy in bed and don’t precisely realize the force/weight ratio. I love sex from the back when he’s laying on my butt but with much heavier men it’s a torture for my back.

Why do women go for shorter men? Simple: they found someone they are attracted to. Same reason why short women end up with tall men.

I didn't intend to end up with a 6'3" man, with me being 5'. It just happened. I have dated men from 5'7" to 6'3". I just ended up with my tall DH because he was most compatible with me. And the sex is fine. No issues. We have two good looking, and taller than average children.

I had a friend who liked dating short men because she liked how the sex was with them. But, that's her preference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually 5 ft 3.5 in

If you're white it's more like 5'5-5'6.

no, it's not.

Ethnicity Mean Height in Inches Mean Height in Centimeters
Non-Hispanic White 63.9 in (5 ft 3.9 in) 162.4 cm
Non-Hispanic Black 64 in (5 ft 4 in) 162.5 cm
Non-Hispanic Asian 61.5 in (5 ft 1.5 in) 156.3 cm
Hispanic 62 in (5 ft 2 in) 157.5 cm
Mexican American 61.7 in (5 ft 1.7 in) 156.8 cm

https://www.verywellfit.com/average-height-for-a-woman-statistics-2632136

I feel like this average is brought down by huge numbers in the boomer-and-older population. I see tons of little old ladies out, short boomers, I think there were nutritional deficiencies in the older generations. As you get younger and younger, the women generally are taller and taller. My own great grandmother, grandmother, and aunt are 5 foot and below, and I’m almost a foot taller.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually 5 ft 3.5 in

If you're white it's more like 5'5-5'6.

no, it's not.

Ethnicity Mean Height in Inches Mean Height in Centimeters
Non-Hispanic White 63.9 in (5 ft 3.9 in) 162.4 cm
Non-Hispanic Black 64 in (5 ft 4 in) 162.5 cm
Non-Hispanic Asian 61.5 in (5 ft 1.5 in) 156.3 cm
Hispanic 62 in (5 ft 2 in) 157.5 cm
Mexican American 61.7 in (5 ft 1.7 in) 156.8 cm

https://www.verywellfit.com/average-height-for-a-woman-statistics-2632136

I feel like this average is brought down by huge numbers in the boomer-and-older population. I see tons of little old ladies out, short boomers, I think there were nutritional deficiencies in the older generations. As you get younger and younger, the women generally are taller and taller. My own great grandmother, grandmother, and aunt are 5 foot and below, and I’m almost a foot taller.

I don't think that's the case today. Nutrition became better after WWII. Most of the older people today were born after WWII. The average height hasn't changed that much since then, maybe like 2cm which is not quite 1".

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/average-height-by-year-of-birth

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Pedophilia

Yep, always gives me that vibe, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a classic example of internal mysogeny lol. If you anonymously ask women whether they would rather be short or tall you know the answer. They have bought into the idea that men should be the taller ones stronger ones. I am 6'3 and my wife is 6'1. Personally I don't see any difference as far as attractiveness between a short and tall woman. And women are already considered tall when they are 5'8 sometimes even 5'7. Crazy

And what is the 'universal' answer? I an short woman and if I could be taller I would want that.

Most women would rather be short than tall. Of course now they will say the opposite lol.

I don't think that's true. I think most women would rather be thin than fat but height isn't as obvious.

Taller women often have an easier time staying thin because they can afford to carry more weight. If you look at celebs who are very tall (5'8" or above) they tend to look thin and willowy even when pregnant or post-partum, even into their 50s and 60s. This is pretty much impossible if you are under 5'3". At that height even a 5 lb weight gain will show up. And pregnancy and menopause can make it very hard to keep a shapely body at that height. Someone like Salma Hayek is the exception that proves the rule -- if I'm over 50 as a woman, I'd much rather be tall.

Shortness is also just kind of inconvenient. You can't reach things, a lot of the world is just not designed for your height. I think when women are young it can feel cute to be sort of helpless in this way and there are definitely men with savior complexes who like to "take care" of a shorter woman even if they are equals in other ways. But life is long and that dynamic would get old. It's easier to be taller in pretty much everything except airplane seating.

I'm 5'5" and content with that, but if you told me I had to either add or subtract 3 inches and I had no other choices, I'd take 5'8" over 5'2" every day of the week and twice on Sundays. My not-that-tall DH (5'11") would still be taller than me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My brother is 6’ 7” and his girlfriend is 4’ 9”. Odd looking couple. They get lots of stares.

Eww. My 10 year old is 4'9".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually 5 ft 3.5 in

If you're white it's more like 5'5-5'6.

no, it's not.

Ethnicity Mean Height in Inches Mean Height in Centimeters
Non-Hispanic White 63.9 in (5 ft 3.9 in) 162.4 cm
Non-Hispanic Black 64 in (5 ft 4 in) 162.5 cm
Non-Hispanic Asian 61.5 in (5 ft 1.5 in) 156.3 cm
Hispanic 62 in (5 ft 2 in) 157.5 cm
Mexican American 61.7 in (5 ft 1.7 in) 156.8 cm

https://www.verywellfit.com/average-height-for-a-woman-statistics-2632136

I feel like this average is brought down by huge numbers in the boomer-and-older population. I see tons of little old ladies out, short boomers, I think there were nutritional deficiencies in the older generations. As you get younger and younger, the women generally are taller and taller. My own great grandmother, grandmother, and aunt are 5 foot and below, and I’m almost a foot taller.

I don't think that's the case today. Nutrition became better after WWII. Most of the older people today were born after WWII. The average height hasn't changed that much since then, maybe like 2cm which is not quite 1".

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/average-height-by-year-of-birth

You can't look at global averages -- there is a ton of poverty and malnutrition in the world. Plus genetics play a huge role which impacts who height changes over time in various parts of the world. And then on top of that migration patterns and intermarriage further impact it:

https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/26/health/human-height-changes-century/index.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is a classic example of internal mysogeny lol. If you anonymously ask women whether they would rather be short or tall you know the answer. They have bought into the idea that men should be the taller ones stronger ones. I am 6'3 and my wife is 6'1. Personally I don't see any difference as far as attractiveness between a short and tall woman. And women are already considered tall when they are 5'8 sometimes even 5'7. Crazy

And what is the 'universal' answer? I an short woman and if I could be taller I would want that.

Most women would rather be short than tall. Of course now they will say the opposite lol.

I don't think that's true. I think most women would rather be thin than fat but height isn't as obvious.

Taller women often have an easier time staying thin because they can afford to carry more weight. If you look at celebs who are very tall (5'8" or above) they tend to look thin and willowy even when pregnant or post-partum, even into their 50s and 60s. This is pretty much impossible if you are under 5'3". At that height even a 5 lb weight gain will show up. And pregnancy and menopause can make it very hard to keep a shapely body at that height. Someone like Salma Hayek is the exception that proves the rule -- if I'm over 50 as a woman, I'd much rather be tall.

Shortness is also just kind of inconvenient. You can't reach things, a lot of the world is just not designed for your height. I think when women are young it can feel cute to be sort of helpless in this way and there are definitely men with savior complexes who like to "take care" of a shorter woman even if they are equals in other ways. But life is long and that dynamic would get old. It's easier to be taller in pretty much everything except airplane seating.

I'm 5'5" and content with that, but if you told me I had to either add or subtract 3 inches and I had no other choices, I'd take 5'8" over 5'2" every day of the week and twice on Sundays. My not-that-tall DH (5'11") would still be taller than me.

5’1” person here. Maintenance calories are about 1600 if you want to stay under 120. It’s quite hard. If you look around most fat women are also on the shorter end.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a 5’8 woman I dated men from 5’9 to 6’4. While most of my dates were over 6’, I feel most comfortable when he’s 5’11-6’. I don’t know what you are talking about sex: it’s great when we can do it standing in the shower with me just wrapping my leg around him, being about same level. My legs are long and mens legs shorter so my P is right at the level of his D. I also don’t like to stretch my neck too much to kiss, better if we are about same level. Also men like to f..k with my legs on his shoulders. Some munch on my toes in the process….
I’m thin and very feminine, round butt and large tits but looking narrower than most shorter women, and way smaller than most men.
OP has weird agenda against tall women

To add, I also look very petite when sitting next to shorter women and have thin ankles, tiny hands with longer thin fingers and size 8 shoe with narrow feminine feet. Men tell me I’m the most proportional woman they’ve ever seen when I get undressed, and a sex bomb. Shorter women who are wider than me look more masculine and “square”, but that’s just my opinion

I think the issue is that so many women and men are overweight in the US. If I was not in the “thin” category, I would have looked totally different

What is feminine feet?