LOL.... I graduated from UVA engineering, NOT CMU engineering. Joking aside, 216K/year is a very good salary for me. |
| All of a sudden fed workers are killing themselves with 80-hour weeks for the good of the country. What a bunch of crap. |
Yes - we have been told over the years to put 40 hours on our timesheets even if we work 60-80. How is that acceptable? |
| To the poster who wrote about the feds being the last bastion of the MC 40 hour work life balance workweek, spot on. I can’t agree with this more. This is where the resentment comes from, from both the working class and the wealthy elites. They all hate it. My parent is a trumper and owns a small business and they hate the idea that their workers might want to have a life, take off from work for their kids sick days, work remotely occasionally, have any sort of work life balance. They say they support my fed career, but it’s clear they’re just supporting it for me as their chikd and they generally hate the fed career path. |
Why resentment? Your father is free to work 40 hour weeks as well. I make less money than I otherwise could by working for the government. It’s fair. |
I’m a fed attorney and I’ll admit I’m not working more than 40 hours (unless I’m earning comp time to use later). Can’t speak for other agencies, but yes there are a lot of feds I know working 40 hour weeks. But I chose this instead of private sector because I’m a mom and wanted work/life balance. The trade off is less money. Taxpayers get what they pay for. You want someone working law firm hours then cough up law firm pay. I don’t think they’d be happy about that. Just besides we are civil servants doesn’t mean we owe you are labor for below market rate. I care about my agency’s mission, but it’s also a job. Most people are balancing pay/benefits/flexibility when choosing their careers (particularly people with advanced degrees from good institutions). This isn’t unique to the public sector. |
Ugh sorry for typos, need more coffee. Just *because* and *our* labor. Since I know someone will predictably snark on that. |
To be fair, some do work hard, but there is SO MUCH dead weight. |
I agree that PP was on to at least some if the reason for the fed hate (that plus the inevitable bad apples present in any workforce that the fed is not magically exempt from). Why does the Dem party not work on that policy and messaging to attempt to woo back working class voters? Become the party of workers rights again instead of engaging in culture wars? |
+1 I'm not a fed, but I support you 100%. |
It’s dumb to think that all 2 million Federal employees (and/or every single person with a Ph.D. I guess?) who work for a variety of agencies should know the weird pay scale of a random cyber security agency that they themselves don’t work for or interact with. Obviously. |
I imagine the GS-14 PhD from the top five program gets corrected a lot. |
They might not have approval for those additional hours and other associated costs. |
For the same reason that Biden’s chief of staff freaked out about remote work and insisted on RTO. Or the reason Kamala’s brother in law told her to lay off the anti-ceo jargon- it made CEOs uncomfortable! Corporate executives control the Democratic Party and would rather lose than give workers more power. |
I’m that PP and I do get corrected a lot! I am wrong sometimes apparently including now. At every Agency I have worked at or known people the specialized payscalea have different names. Because there’s a lot of public perception that most feds should not earn that much. Our exceptions are mostly medical officers or people hired through different hiring mechanisms. Anyway apparently you know tons of these cybersecurity people who talk about their pay in great detail (?) and also go golfing nonstop. I stand by the main point of my post which is that the vast majority of GS pay scale employees are not earning that $$ regardless of their education or what they would earn in industry. |