Superintendent Taylor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they go through with the virtual school plan, I hope they include home visits. Far too often parents keep their kids out of school to hide abuse:
https://ksltv.com/664062/the-system-is-broken-cafeteria-worker-speaks-out-in-death-of-12-year-old-boy/

You are posting about a child going to school in person. The school should have fed this child and been more pro-active. This has nothing to do with virtual school. This has to do with CPS and in-person school failing this child. He was being abused long before homeschooling and homeschooling is not the MVA.

No, the child was pulled out of school by the mother because she was upset they were feeding him. That's when the child died. School had been the only thing keeping him alive.

Again, this has nothing to do with virtual school. Try harder next time.

How would MVA staff find kids rummaging for food in the trash because their parents won't feed them? Virtual school is a dream come true child abusers.

What on earth are you rambling about? This has nothing to do with the MVA or virtual students. This child was neglected going to an in person school.

The point they are attempting to make is so stupid too. “We can’t even manage to protect kids in school- but in school in the only option! Something something therefore, virtual=bad!” The mental gymnastics to get to a terrible point is something….

If that child continued to go to school, there's a very good chance he would not have starved to death.

Unfortunately, that's not even an isolated case. In April, West Virginia girl also died of starvation. Her parents had pulled her out of school ostensibly due to concerns about covid.

What does this have to do with the MVA?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they go through with the virtual school plan, I hope they include home visits. Far too often parents keep their kids out of school to hide abuse:
https://ksltv.com/664062/the-system-is-broken-cafeteria-worker-speaks-out-in-death-of-12-year-old-boy/

You are posting about a child going to school in person. The school should have fed this child and been more pro-active. This has nothing to do with virtual school. This has to do with CPS and in-person school failing this child. He was being abused long before homeschooling and homeschooling is not the MVA.

No, the child was pulled out of school by the mother because she was upset they were feeding him. That's when the child died. School had been the only thing keeping him alive.

Again, this has nothing to do with virtual school. Try harder next time.

How would MVA staff find kids rummaging for food in the trash because their parents won't feed them? Virtual school is a dream come true child abusers.

What on earth are you rambling about? This has nothing to do with the MVA or virtual students. This child was neglected going to an in person school.

The point they are attempting to make is so stupid too. “We can’t even manage to protect kids in school- but in school in the only option! Something something therefore, virtual=bad!” The mental gymnastics to get to a terrible point is something….

If that child continued to go to school, there's a very good chance he would not have starved to death.

Unfortunately, that's not even an isolated case. In April, West Virginia girl also died of starvation. Her parents had pulled her out of school ostensibly due to concerns about covid.

Your logic makes no sense. They would have starved over summer break.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they go through with the virtual school plan, I hope they include home visits. Far too often parents keep their kids out of school to hide abuse:
https://ksltv.com/664062/the-system-is-broken-cafeteria-worker-speaks-out-in-death-of-12-year-old-boy/

You are posting about a child going to school in person. The school should have fed this child and been more pro-active. This has nothing to do with virtual school. This has to do with CPS and in-person school failing this child. He was being abused long before homeschooling and homeschooling is not the MVA.

No, the child was pulled out of school by the mother because she was upset they were feeding him. That's when the child died. School had been the only thing keeping him alive.

Again, this has nothing to do with virtual school. Try harder next time.

How would MVA staff find kids rummaging for food in the trash because their parents won't feed them? Virtual school is a dream come true child abusers.

What on earth are you rambling about? This has nothing to do with the MVA or virtual students. This child was neglected going to an in person school.

The point they are attempting to make is so stupid too. “We can’t even manage to protect kids in school- but in school in the only option! Something something therefore, virtual=bad!” The mental gymnastics to get to a terrible point is something….

If that child continued to go to school, there's a very good chance he would not have starved to death.

Unfortunately, that's not even an isolated case. In April, West Virginia girl also died of starvation. Her parents had pulled her out of school ostensibly due to concerns about covid.

Now talk about the child that was denied her inhaler and died of an asthma attack in the hall at Gaithersburg High School. MCPS killed that child.

In es our school fed my child a food they were allergic too. They were having kids taste foods for some fruit and veggie thing. Thankfully it was at the end of the day and at pick up we went immediately to the er. Not a fun evening. Child said they said they were allergic and teacher said it’s fine and eat it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they go through with the virtual school plan, I hope they include home visits. Far too often parents keep their kids out of school to hide abuse:
https://ksltv.com/664062/the-system-is-broken-cafeteria-worker-speaks-out-in-death-of-12-year-old-boy/

You are posting about a child going to school in person. The school should have fed this child and been more pro-active. This has nothing to do with virtual school. This has to do with CPS and in-person school failing this child. He was being abused long before homeschooling and homeschooling is not the MVA.

No, the child was pulled out of school by the mother because she was upset they were feeding him. That's when the child died. School had been the only thing keeping him alive.

Again, this has nothing to do with virtual school. Try harder next time.

How would MVA staff find kids rummaging for food in the trash because their parents won't feed them? Virtual school is a dream come true child abusers.

What on earth are you rambling about? This has nothing to do with the MVA or virtual students. This child was neglected going to an in person school.

The point they are attempting to make is so stupid too. “We can’t even manage to protect kids in school- but in school in the only option! Something something therefore, virtual=bad!” The mental gymnastics to get to a terrible point is something….

If that child continued to go to school, there's a very good chance he would not have starved to death.

Unfortunately, that's not even an isolated case. In April, West Virginia girl also died of starvation. Her parents had pulled her out of school ostensibly due to concerns about covid.

What does this have to do with the MVA?

Superintendent Taylor proposed bringing back virtual school. If MCPS moves forward with that proposal, they should include processes to identify and protect kids from abusive situations at home. That would probably include a home visit during the application/enrollment process.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they go through with the virtual school plan, I hope they include home visits. Far too often parents keep their kids out of school to hide abuse:
https://ksltv.com/664062/the-system-is-broken-cafeteria-worker-speaks-out-in-death-of-12-year-old-boy/

You are posting about a child going to school in person. The school should have fed this child and been more pro-active. This has nothing to do with virtual school. This has to do with CPS and in-person school failing this child. He was being abused long before homeschooling and homeschooling is not the MVA.

No, the child was pulled out of school by the mother because she was upset they were feeding him. That's when the child died. School had been the only thing keeping him alive.

Again, this has nothing to do with virtual school. Try harder next time.

How would MVA staff find kids rummaging for food in the trash because their parents won't feed them? Virtual school is a dream come true child abusers.

What on earth are you rambling about? This has nothing to do with the MVA or virtual students. This child was neglected going to an in person school.

The point they are attempting to make is so stupid too. “We can’t even manage to protect kids in school- but in school in the only option! Something something therefore, virtual=bad!” The mental gymnastics to get to a terrible point is something….

If that child continued to go to school, there's a very good chance he would not have starved to death.

Unfortunately, that's not even an isolated case. In April, West Virginia girl also died of starvation. Her parents had pulled her out of school ostensibly due to concerns about covid.

Your logic makes no sense. They would have starved over summer break.

You misunderstand how these situations go. The victims often aren't starved by completely cutting off all food. They suffer slowly from malnourishment over many months.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they go through with the virtual school plan, I hope they include home visits. Far too often parents keep their kids out of school to hide abuse:
https://ksltv.com/664062/the-system-is-broken-cafeteria-worker-speaks-out-in-death-of-12-year-old-boy/

You are posting about a child going to school in person. The school should have fed this child and been more pro-active. This has nothing to do with virtual school. This has to do with CPS and in-person school failing this child. He was being abused long before homeschooling and homeschooling is not the MVA.

No, the child was pulled out of school by the mother because she was upset they were feeding him. That's when the child died. School had been the only thing keeping him alive.

Again, this has nothing to do with virtual school. Try harder next time.

How would MVA staff find kids rummaging for food in the trash because their parents won't feed them? Virtual school is a dream come true child abusers.

What on earth are you rambling about? This has nothing to do with the MVA or virtual students. This child was neglected going to an in person school.

The point they are attempting to make is so stupid too. “We can’t even manage to protect kids in school- but in school in the only option! Something something therefore, virtual=bad!” The mental gymnastics to get to a terrible point is something….

If that child continued to go to school, there's a very good chance he would not have starved to death.

Unfortunately, that's not even an isolated case. In April, West Virginia girl also died of starvation. Her parents had pulled her out of school ostensibly due to concerns about covid.

Your logic makes no sense. They would have starved over summer break.

You misunderstand how these situations go. The victims often aren't starved by completely cutting off all food. They suffer slowly from malnourishment over many months.

Again, it’s a stretch to blame the mva as this was not an mva child and the child was in person and removed to homeschool. Come summer it would have been an issue. So, what you are saying is all in person kids should have home visits as the abuse and neglect started when this child was in person.

[Anonymous]

Start another discussion about MVA or hybrid or whatever idea it is that is being floated elsewhere. Re: Taylor he decided to entertain idea of mva again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Start another discussion about MVA or hybrid or whatever idea it is that is being floated elsewhere. Re: Taylor he decided to entertain idea of mva again.

He’s not doing anything. He’s trying to stop the advocacy. The new proposed program has no funding. And it’s not adequate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Start another discussion about MVA or hybrid or whatever idea it is that is being floated elsewhere. Re: Taylor he decided to entertain idea of mva again.

He’s not doing anything. He’s trying to stop the advocacy. The new proposed program has no funding. And it’s not adequate.

How so? If it gets funding, kids with legitimate medical needs could use it. But kids that can go to school would need to still go to school.

Are you the parent that sent her daughter to MVA so she wouldn't get into "fashion"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Start another discussion about MVA or hybrid or whatever idea it is that is being floated elsewhere. Re: Taylor he decided to entertain idea of mva again.

He’s not doing anything. He’s trying to stop the advocacy. The new proposed program has no funding. And it’s not adequate.

How so? If it gets funding, kids with legitimate medical needs could use it. But kids that can go to school would need to still go to school.

Are you the parent that sent her daughter to MVA so she wouldn't get into "fashion"?

Mine don't care about fashion but why parents choose it is none of your business. Who decides legit medical needs or not? If a parent chooses it for safety, that's their choice. If a parent decides it for bullying, we can look at people like you who bully and teach their kids to bully. You got to choose the format of your kids education and so should others. It might not have worked for you as it requires involved parents, but it works for many other kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Start another discussion about MVA or hybrid or whatever idea it is that is being floated elsewhere. Re: Taylor he decided to entertain idea of mva again.

He’s not doing anything. He’s trying to stop the advocacy. The new proposed program has no funding. And it’s not adequate.

How so? If it gets funding, kids with legitimate medical needs could use it. But kids that can go to school would need to still go to school.

Are you the parent that sent her daughter to MVA so she wouldn't get into "fashion"?

Mine don't care about fashion but why parents choose it is none of your business. Who decides legit medical needs or not? If a parent chooses it for safety, that's their choice. If a parent decides it for bullying, we can look at people like you who bully and teach their kids to bully. You got to choose the format of your kids education and so should others. It might not have worked for you as it requires involved parents, but it works for many other kids.

No, unless you're paying for private school or doing homeschooling, you didn't get to "choose for format of your kids education." You got whatever public school offered you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Start another discussion about MVA or hybrid or whatever idea it is that is being floated elsewhere. Re: Taylor he decided to entertain idea of mva again.

He’s not doing anything. He’s trying to stop the advocacy. The new proposed program has no funding. And it’s not adequate.

How so? If it gets funding, kids with legitimate medical needs could use it. But kids that can go to school would need to still go to school.

Are you the parent that sent her daughter to MVA so she wouldn't get into "fashion"?

You clearly don't understand the difference between physical and mental health and you only see physical health as a necessary reason for not attending traditional school. Step out of 1950 and evolve with the rest of us. Your little "fashion" tirade is so boring and tired. A singular parent listed that as a concern and you chose to lock onto that for an argument as if your life depended on it. *Yawn*

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Start another discussion about MVA or hybrid or whatever idea it is that is being floated elsewhere. Re: Taylor he decided to entertain idea of mva again.

He’s not doing anything. He’s trying to stop the advocacy. The new proposed program has no funding. And it’s not adequate.

How so? If it gets funding, kids with legitimate medical needs could use it. But kids that can go to school would need to still go to school.

Are you the parent that sent her daughter to MVA so she wouldn't get into "fashion"?

You clearly don't understand the difference between physical and mental health and you only see physical health as a necessary reason for not attending traditional school. Step out of 1950 and evolve with the rest of us. Your little "fashion" tirade is so boring and tired. A singular parent listed that as a concern and you chose to lock onto that for an argument as if your life depended on it. *Yawn*

No one said physical health but you. Of course mental health needs should be considered. But it should be limited to the mental health needs of the child, not of their parents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Start another discussion about MVA or hybrid or whatever idea it is that is being floated elsewhere. Re: Taylor he decided to entertain idea of mva again.

He’s not doing anything. He’s trying to stop the advocacy. The new proposed program has no funding. And it’s not adequate.

How so? If it gets funding, kids with legitimate medical needs could use it. But kids that can go to school would need to still go to school.

Are you the parent that sent her daughter to MVA so she wouldn't get into "fashion"?

You clearly don't understand the difference between physical and mental health and you only see physical health as a necessary reason for not attending traditional school. Step out of 1950 and evolve with the rest of us. Your little "fashion" tirade is so boring and tired. A singular parent listed that as a concern and you chose to lock onto that for an argument as if your life depended on it. *Yawn*

No one said physical health but you. Of course mental health needs should be considered. But it should be limited to the mental health needs of the child, not of their parents.

Read all of your posts (and Twitter bs)...Stop trying to call out parent mental health because they want their kids to be safe during school hours. That's been your playbook for years and it's tired. Ever imagine that some parents actually do what is best for their children? Even if YOU don't agree with it? Probably not because your world view is so narrow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Start another discussion about MVA or hybrid or whatever idea it is that is being floated elsewhere. Re: Taylor he decided to entertain idea of mva again.

He’s not doing anything. He’s trying to stop the advocacy. The new proposed program has no funding. And it’s not adequate.

How so? If it gets funding, kids with legitimate medical needs could use it. But kids that can go to school would need to still go to school.

Are you the parent that sent her daughter to MVA so she wouldn't get into "fashion"?

You clearly don't understand the difference between physical and mental health and you only see physical health as a necessary reason for not attending traditional school. Step out of 1950 and evolve with the rest of us. Your little "fashion" tirade is so boring and tired. A singular parent listed that as a concern and you chose to lock onto that for an argument as if your life depended on it. *Yawn*

No one said physical health but you. Of course mental health needs should be considered. But it should be limited to the mental health needs of the child, not of their parents.

Read all of your posts (and Twitter bs)...Stop trying to call out parent mental health because they want their kids to be safe during school hours. That's been your playbook for years and it's tired. Ever imagine that some parents actually do what is best for their children? Even if YOU don't agree with it? Probably not because your world view is so narrow.

Don't be so melodramatic. Your kids are safe at school. Your fear of your kids hanging out with the wrong crowd/color doesn't entitle you to a school format of your choice at taxpayer expense. Do what the rest of the Karens in the county do in that situation: move to Potomac or Chevy Chase, send your kid to private school, or homeschool.