Potomac Soccer Offers

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Potomac teams played in lower divisions in their own tournament and still got hammered.

Ours didn't. We came in 2nd in our group on a technicality; if the rules were goal differential instead of head to head, we'd have advanced (and maybe then gotten hammered).

You lost head to head and call that a technicality?

Tiebreaker rules are often total goals. So yeah, who advanced was up to the tiebreaker rules…could have gone several ways.

Sounds like you should have won the head to head game

I mean they tried! Just a small note: I think you’re feeling just a little more amped up and competitive than I am about this.

I'm amped up by simply pointing out your excuses about the rules is silly?
Did they change the rules after your team qualified?

Chill out. It sounds like if two teams have to go to a tiebreaker neither "got hammered" which is the original insult in play here towards Potomac teams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Potomac teams played in lower divisions in their own tournament and still got hammered.

Ours didn't. We came in 2nd in our group on a technicality; if the rules were goal differential instead of head to head, we'd have advanced (and maybe then gotten hammered).

You lost head to head and call that a technicality?

Tiebreaker rules are often total goals. So yeah, who advanced was up to the tiebreaker rules…could have gone several ways.

Sounds like you should have won the head to head game

I mean they tried! Just a small note: I think you’re feeling just a little more amped up and competitive than I am about this.

I'm amped up by simply pointing out your excuses about the rules is silly?
Did they change the rules after your team qualified?

Chill out. It sounds like if two teams have to go to a tiebreaker neither "got hammered" which is the original insult in play here towards Potomac teams.

Chill out. Stop whining because your team wasn't good enough to win the established tiebreaker

[Anonymous]

Ah, we've reached the "I know you are, but what am I?" point in the thread. Well done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Potomac teams played in lower divisions in their own tournament and still got hammered.

Ours didn't. We came in 2nd in our group on a technicality; if the rules were goal differential instead of head to head, we'd have advanced (and maybe then gotten hammered).

You lost head to head and call that a technicality?

Tiebreaker rules are often total goals. So yeah, who advanced was up to the tiebreaker rules…could have gone several ways.

Sounds like you should have won the head to head game

I mean they tried! Just a small note: I think you’re feeling just a little more amped up and competitive than I am about this.

I'm amped up by simply pointing out your excuses about the rules is silly?
Did they change the rules after your team qualified?

Chill out. It sounds like if two teams have to go to a tiebreaker neither "got hammered" which is the original insult in play here towards Potomac teams.

Chill out. Stop whining because your team wasn't good enough to win the established tiebreaker

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Potomac teams played in lower divisions in their own tournament and still got hammered.

Ours didn't. We came in 2nd in our group on a technicality; if the rules were goal differential instead of head to head, we'd have advanced (and maybe then gotten hammered).

You lost head to head and call that a technicality?

Tiebreaker rules are often total goals. So yeah, who advanced was up to the tiebreaker rules…could have gone several ways.

Sounds like you should have won the head to head game

I mean they tried! Just a small note: I think you’re feeling just a little more amped up and competitive than I am about this.

I'm amped up by simply pointing out your excuses about the rules is silly?
Did they change the rules after your team qualified?

Chill out. It sounds like if two teams have to go to a tiebreaker neither "got hammered" which is the original insult in play here towards Potomac teams.

Chill out. Stop whining because your team wasn't good enough to win the established tiebreaker

Why do all these post start to devolve into this nonsense... how hard is it for adults to discuss things in an adult manner? I might understand if someone called you out on something direct or said something about you kid, but it's not the case here. If your kid is in travel soccer, you are likely a professional of some sort (as it's pretty expensive) so act like a professional - unless you are a professional a55hole, then good on you for being you .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Potomac teams played in lower divisions in their own tournament and still got hammered.

Ours didn't. We came in 2nd in our group on a technicality; if the rules were goal differential instead of head to head, we'd have advanced (and maybe then gotten hammered).

You lost head to head and call that a technicality?

Tiebreaker rules are often total goals. So yeah, who advanced was up to the tiebreaker rules…could have gone several ways.

Sounds like you should have won the head to head game

I mean they tried! Just a small note: I think you’re feeling just a little more amped up and competitive than I am about this.

I'm amped up by simply pointing out your excuses about the rules is silly?
Did they change the rules after your team qualified?

Chill out. It sounds like if two teams have to go to a tiebreaker neither "got hammered" which is the original insult in play here towards Potomac teams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Potomac teams played in lower divisions in their own tournament and still got hammered.

Ours didn't. We came in 2nd in our group on a technicality; if the rules were goal differential instead of head to head, we'd have advanced (and maybe then gotten hammered).

You lost head to head and call that a technicality?

Tiebreaker rules are often total goals. So yeah, who advanced was up to the tiebreaker rules…could have gone several ways.

Sounds like you should have won the head to head game

I mean they tried! Just a small note: I think you’re feeling just a little more amped up and competitive than I am about this.

I'm amped up by simply pointing out your excuses about the rules is silly?
Did they change the rules after your team qualified?

Chill out. It sounds like if two teams have to go to a tiebreaker neither "got hammered" which is the original insult in play here towards Potomac teams.

Chill out. Stop whining because your team wasn't good enough to win the established tiebreaker

Why do all these post start to devolve into this nonsense... how hard is it for adults to discuss things in an adult manner? I might understand if someone called you out on something direct or said something about you kid, but it's not the case here. If your kid is in travel soccer, you are likely a professional of some sort (as it's pretty expensive) so act like a professional - unless you are a professional a55hole, then good on you for being you .

This is true. But also, there are parents who never had what their child has, so, trying to relive it through their kids. Some parents never left high school, sadly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Potomac teams played in lower divisions in their own tournament and still got hammered.

Ours didn't. We came in 2nd in our group on a technicality; if the rules were goal differential instead of head to head, we'd have advanced (and maybe then gotten hammered).

You lost head to head and call that a technicality?

Tiebreaker rules are often total goals. So yeah, who advanced was up to the tiebreaker rules…could have gone several ways.

Sounds like you should have won the head to head game

I mean they tried! Just a small note: I think you’re feeling just a little more amped up and competitive than I am about this.

I'm amped up by simply pointing out your excuses about the rules is silly?
Did they change the rules after your team qualified?

Chill out. It sounds like if two teams have to go to a tiebreaker neither "got hammered" which is the original insult in play here towards Potomac teams.

Chill out. Stop whining because your team wasn't good enough to win the established tiebreaker

Why do all these post start to devolve into this nonsense... how hard is it for adults to discuss things in an adult manner? I might understand if someone called you out on something direct or said something about you kid, but it's not the case here. If your kid is in travel soccer, you are likely a professional of some sort (as it's pretty expensive) so act like a professional - unless you are a professional a55hole, then good on you for being you .

This is true. But also, there are parents who never had what their child has, so, trying to relive it through their kids. Some parents never left high school, sadly.

This, unfortunately… though I’m a parent that didn’t have what my kid has, but it’s their life and I’m not going online to be an a-hole to others