I’m going to be an empty nester at 55. I have three kids and had my first at 31 after getting married at 30. |
|
I’ll be 56 when my youngest (our fourth) starts college. Doubt we will downsize until I’m 60 or so (spouse is a little older than I am).
I’m hoping we can buy a small house or even a condo in a beach community near a well resourced area (in terms of good hospitals, accessible major airport, and good amenities). I’ve stayed at some really lovely condos that were spacious enough to live in year round. Seems ideal for carefree living. |
Also your body and your circumstances allowed you to “choose” that path. What a smug response that indicates lack of awareness of the realities of other people’s lives. |
When you are wealthy everything is easier.
|
Sure. But not all these couples are wealthy. The couple that sold their $2M home where they had raised their kids paid half that when they purchased decades ago. Others sold their standard 4 bdrm colonials and bought a condo for half the price. When you downsize, it typically means cutting your costs. Literally anyone can downsize. |
“My body”?!?! Yes it’s choices. Had first at 30 and 2nd at 34. Obviously if you haven’t found a life partner you cannot do that. But once again that is about choices—-had I married later, I still doubt I’d have wanted a kid at 40. But not that difficult to be married and able to have a kid at 30/32. Just like I chose not to have a kid at 22, you can choose not to have a kid at 40+ |
THis 1000% Downsize, cut costs and work required for maintenance (yard, shoveling if in area with snow). Do it if you want, don't do it if you still love your family home and like all the space. Personally, I love my 1500 sq ft condo. Easy to clean and maintain, and the HOA fees cover most maintenance so I don't have to do anything except the interior maintenance. No more lawn care, no roof or exterior painting, etc |
DP here - I think it was more of a response to the poster calling us child brides for having a baby at 30. |
Yup! If I had kids at 22 and 24, I'd be an empty nester at 42 (off to college) and full empty nester at 46 (last kid out of college). It's not that difficult to choose to be done having kids by 34/35. |
You are a child bride. When did you marry? I would hate for my daughters to waste their youth getting knocked up and being a servant to some bum in exchange for when they are 55 can be an empty Nestor. You can’t be 25 at 55. To be honest if I was a widower at 70 and met a hot 42 year who wanted a kid I have another. |
Didn't waste my youth. Got married at 22, first kid at 30, fully lived life before kids, once kids arrived and now really enjoying empty nesting in my early 50s. But have friends who had kids at 22, done by 24 and living life fully in their 40s without kids around. Either way, you do what works for you. Also, my son or daughter are allowed to select what to do in life themselves. |
+1. There are so many insecure people on DCUM. I would never attack someone for having a child at an age they deemed appropriate for them. I find that on DCUM women who had children at older ages seem to need to attack women who had children at younger ages. I never see this flipped unless someone is responding to a rude comment. Everything doesn't need to be endlessly picked over and compared and analyzed. We are all doing our best and because we are different people in different circumstances with different resources our best and how we even determine what our best is will be different but no one should feel superior or inferior to anyone based on the timing of when they had children. |
DP. I think pp was referring to people have fertility issues when they mentioned your "body." Some people are unable to have children as easily as you did ar 30/32. |
I got a Ranch/Bunker complex in Montana the kids can come to when WW3 kicks off. |
Yes, you do what works for you. There are advantages to every scenario. I know people who had kids at 20/21. That is likely the "least attractive" solution to me. It typically means the woman quit college to raise the kid. Sometimes it means the guy did as well to have a job to support the family. The perks are that by time you are 40/42, your kids are out of the house and you are still able to travel and do so much. But the issue is, typically with that path, you struggled to get started and likely don't make as much as you would if you waited until 28-30 to have first kid. 28-30 for first kid is the "sweet spot" IMO. You can be done having them by 34/35 and empty nesters by 55. You were able to start your career (unless doctor or lawyer) and be well established, thus allowing you to stay at home for a bit, work PT, etc. With careers well established, you can afford to live a better life than someone at 22 having a kid and still retire/be empty nesters while still able to really enjoy life/be healthy. 35-40 for having kids, works just fine, but fact is you run risk of higher possibility for health issues with mom/baby. You will be 60 or so possibly older when your last kid exits the house after college. So you might need to work until 62/65 just because you have kids still under your care. At 65+ you might not be able to travel and do same things as if you were empty nesters at 55. Pick whatever works for you. Life is too short to worry about others |