Where are you getting that data? |
The data I'm reading says for high school Math PARCC it's Walls, Basis, Banneker, McKinley Tech, DCI and then Latin. Ela is a bit better -- Walls, Banneker, Basis and then Latin, McKinley https://www.empowerk12.org/data-dashboard-source/dc-parcc-dash |
True. PP must have gone to Latin. |
Nope … |
|
My child got into a competitive private high school from Latin, as did about 10% of the class.
Latin turn DC onto Latin (the language), which is a plus and I think taking AP Latin will be good on an application. It was likely a better atmosphere than Deal or Hardy (because of the covid years), but by 8th grade DC was just over it. I really hate that public school just wasn't enough for my kid, but it wasn't. Private high school offers the advanced challenges they needed. People REALLY love Latin. We did not. |
EmpowerK12 website. Filter for "HS", "4+" and "all students". |
Actually, yes. If you have a data source that shows it's not, then cite it. |
If you are getting McKinley Tech first, then you are reading 3+ (approaching proficiency) and not 4+ (proficiency). The EmpowerK12 dashboards are set at 3+ and at-risk unless you filter them. |
Sure. Set for 4+ and all kids we have for math: Walls (67 percent) Basis (63) Banneker (45) Latin (30 percent) ELA, same order https://www.empowerk12.org/data-dashboard-source/dc-parcc-dash |
Considering the low at risk % at Latin, 30% is really low to be proficient in math. That is less than 1/3rd of the kids. |
PP here, correct. As to your statement about not knowing any other feeder families that got offers, you need to realize there are many families like us who did not even play the lottery for Latin so getting an offer is a moot point. You can’t get an offer if you don’t list it. Lastly your anecdotal about knowing a few feeder families there does not prove many families from feeders go there. I don’t know percentages but this question was asked directly to leadership at the open house by another family and their answer was no. |
I think you need to add combined MS and HS to get DCI to show up. It comes in right above Latin. |
I saw that also but DCI has twice the at risk of Latin so they seem to being doing a better job overall. |
|
The Lamb comparison is really not a good one. Lamb is not really rigorous in 4th-5th grade so families at Latin are having a better experience in comparison. But these lamb families at Latin have not been to DCI so their experience at Latin tells you nothing about how DCI compares. While Latin may be good for classics, DCI offers better stem and language opportunities. I know of Latin families whose kids were below level in Math and they are really happy with the targeted help the school provides their kids. But for kids who are at grade level or advanced, they’re pretty bored with Latin math/science.
quote=Anonymous]
Thanks for this. I trimmed just to reduce text. We actually know a few different LAMB families at Latin and they highly recommended it to us and I don't know any other feeder families that got an offier so that part isn't super telling to me. We watched presentations from both schools and didn't get the blown away reaction you had but will visit in person, I hope, and will see. I'm assuming you didn't even enter the lottery based on what you saw? |
|
The problem with the DC PARCC Dashboard is that you are comparing all MS and HS students in schools such as BASIS and DCI to all HS students including HS students in selective schools such as Walls and Banneker (this doesn’t affect Latin since for some reason they provide separate scores for MS and HS) The PARCC scores of a 5th grader at BASIS or Latin, which are both 100% lottery schools, are not going to tell you much about the education at those schools since those kids had just enrolled. Moreover, it is absurd to compare such a 5th grader to a high school student at Walls and Banneker, who may well have come from BASIS or Latin. And you are also including 9th grade kids at, say, Walls and Banneker that are being tested just after they entered those schools. Again, that is not going to tell you much about the education at Walls and Banneker.
A better comparison is to look how kids did on the PARCC in 10th grade. This is after they have been at BASIS, DCI, and Latin for a while and after they have been at Walls and Banneker for at least a couple of years. Here are the 4+ 10th grade PARCC scores for the schools above: BASIS ELA 87.5 Math 90.0 Walls ELA 93.5 Math 56.0 Banneker ELA 84.09 Math 36.0 Latin ELA 71.91 Math <=10.0 DCI ELA 45.26 Math suppressed [27.48 in 9th grade] In short, BASIS is way ahead of other schools in math and Walls, BASIS, and Banneker are about the same for ELA. Accordingly, if you have an academically inclined kid, you would probably pick BASIS over Latin and DCI for MS and if your kid went to BASIS you would be unlikely to switch in 9th grade to Walls or Banneker for academic reasons, particularly if you were focused on STEM. |