What in the world? Don’t you have friends and relatives living in other states? Why do you think its somehow out of bounds to want affordable access to a public university? |
So an R1 university in DC could be a profit center? |
Not true. DC TAG pays 10k per year. Period. My DS is attending MC this semester. SC TAG is paying $5,000, we pay the rest. It’s a bargain this semester. Next year we’ll pay 30k for an OOS state college while the resident of that state pay 14k. And when I say we pay 30k, that is AFTER DC TAG. |
What a silly post. Eleanor’s been the one championing Dc TAG. |
Then don’t take it. There are plenty of families in DC who make too much to get aid but paying OOS makes college out of reach, especially with multiple kids. I’d be fine with getting In State with MD & VA schools in exchange for them using our streets. |
That is not what the law says:
(bolding added) https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-106hr974enr/html/BILLS-106hr974enr.htm One of my sons attends and out-of-state university at which the non-resident tuition is less than $10,000 more more than the resident tuition. As a result, we get less than $10k a year. |
The thing is, they aren’t “your” streets. DC belongs to the American people. You chose to live in a federal district but that doesn’t mean you get to start charging the rest of use to use OUR national city. |
Ok then YOUR state can give DC kids in-state tuition as a condition of getting federal aid. |
I don't think it's out of bounds, but the idea that we in D.C. somehow deserve this benefit because we didn't move away seems silly. And I suspect, though I don't really know for sure, that this particular benefit is, like 529 plans, largely something upper-middle-class families take advantage of. If it's still available when my kids go to college (no reason to think it wouldn't be, it's not that far off), and they qualify, I'll take it, but let's not pretend it's somehow serving some great higher pursuit of justice in the process. |
I doubt there are many families who both make too much money to get aid and have to truly reach to pay for college. If you make too much money for aid, you can afford to send your kids to college. You maybe can't afford it EASILY or without making any tradeoffs (I can't either), but it's not actually like you can't afford to do it. |
There is actually a justification for a benefit that largely serves the middle class. The poor who have the academic achievements necessary for college will get significant financial aid. These days, colleges will roll out the red carpet for them. In DC, they can benefit from DC CAP as well as DC TAG. The rich will simply write a check. But, it is the middle class that is too wealthy for financial aid but not wealthy enough to fund college out-of-pocket that struggles. It makes sense to help that group out. |
Narrator: It is means tested already. |
| They really should just get rid of DC TAG and all the funding brinksmanship and just give DC kids in-state tuition at any public university in the US. Those universities already get a HUGE amount of federal funding and subsidies in research dollars, Pell grants, student loans, plus their IRS non-profit status that absolves them from paying federal taxes on their income. |
Is it? I'm not aware of any income limits on who's eligible for it. |
Sure, but what's the incentive for anyone except D.C. residents to want to do this? The federal government won't want to pay more than TAG costs; other states won't particularly want to just give discounted tuition to out-of-state D.C. kids. It's a good idea with absolutely no prayer of finding a political coalition to support it. |