Chique |
![]() |
I would think a relative can also be a friend, and an email today serves the same purpose as a letter in past generations. |
That is normal language. I'm sorry you speak like a 3rd grader. |
fallacious https://grammarist.com/spelling/chic-sheik/#:~:text=Despite%20chique%20popping%20up%20in,same%20trendy%20concept%20of%20chic |
You could just say she sounds stuck up. You could have told her to say she did stuff. Why so wordy, PP? Are you stuck up? |
Blow me |
This person probably didn't know what the word meant, or he read it quickly as "pathetic." Or both. It doesn't matter the reason. You felt misunderstood, and several pps made good suggestions as to how to rectify it. I use obscure words when writing work papers where I need to change things up from time to time. If you routinely use uncommon words in emails to family members I'd think you're a pedantic. |
Well, now we’re really showing off our education, aren’t we ? |
It’s fairly obscure. Know your audience. |
I also was unfamiliar with word and couldn’t even pronounce it. Thankfully google will give the pronunciation as well the meaning. |
I’m a writer with a graduate degree in English and a JD. I use a thesaurus for work most days. I would not have used peripatetic in an email. It sounds pretentious. |
My point (which I guess was less than clear) was that peripatetic is NOT a misused word - it is a crisp word, perfect for when one means to use it. So I think it was an excellent word for OP to use in context (I thought her original question was whether she should have chosen a different word). But to your point, “peruse” is an often misused and misunderstood word, but if you felt the situation called for it, wouldn’t you still use it? |
Lot of people have shitty reading comprehension and cannot follow more than a couple of sentences. That's just how it is, in the future chatbot will understand you though and translate it for the peasants. |
Yes, I know what it means. I wouldn't use it in regular conversation/email, because it's obscure and in that context sounds pretentious.
19:46 on the first page has good language for how to correct the misunderstanding without sounding like a know-it-all. I still remember a guy I'd just met correcting my pronunciation of "vise," 20+ years later. That interaction was the first indication of what an incredible tool he was. |