Wealthy donors pull funding from from Harvard and U Penn for failure to denounce “antisemitism”

[Anonymous]

Cancelling people for racism is fine.

Cancelling people for celebrating a terrorist attack is fascism and means Jews aren’t actually persecuted.

Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This Berkeley law professor is cautioning law firms from hiring his own students who openly express their support of Hamas and have expressed antisemitism.

If you are a legal employer, when you interview students from Berkeley, Harvard, NYU or any other law school this year, ask them what organizations they belong to. Ask if they support discriminatory bylaws or other acts and resolutions blaming Jews and Israelis for the Hamas massacre. If a student endorses hatred, it isn’t only your right but your duty not to hire him. Do you want your clients represented by someone who condones these monstrous crimes?

You guys are actual fascists. You can see that, right? It is crazy to think that in the year 2023 we have entire industries, media elites, CEOs and the rich and wealthy of DCUM trying to blackball students and activists who believe that it is bad to blow up 2 million Palestinians. Honestly, the thought police here is next level. You guys scare the bejesus out of me. So much for your mantra of Jews being the persecuted class. That's complete BS

Sorry, buddy. Businesses, law firms, and others are starting to wake up to the idea that having SJWs who condone terrorism and destruction might not make the best employees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This Berkeley law professor is cautioning law firms from hiring his own students who openly express their support of Hamas and have expressed antisemitism.

If you are a legal employer, when you interview students from Berkeley, Harvard, NYU or any other law school this year, ask them what organizations they belong to. Ask if they support discriminatory bylaws or other acts and resolutions blaming Jews and Israelis for the Hamas massacre. If a student endorses hatred, it isn’t only your right but your duty not to hire him. Do you want your clients represented by someone who condones these monstrous crimes?

You guys are actual fascists. You can see that, right? It is crazy to think that in the year 2023 we have entire industries, media elites, CEOs and the rich and wealthy of DCUM trying to blackball students and activists who believe that it is bad to blow up 2 million Palestinians. Honestly, the thought police here is next level. You guys scare the bejesus out of me. So much for your mantra of Jews being the persecuted class. That's complete BS

I bet you celebrated when trumpers and j6 supporters, which I totally condemn, were being cancelled. People with hateful views in general should be cancelled. That’s the upside of cancel culture.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This Berkeley law professor is cautioning law firms from hiring his own students who openly express their support of Hamas and have expressed antisemitism.

If you are a legal employer, when you interview students from Berkeley, Harvard, NYU or any other law school this year, ask them what organizations they belong to. Ask if they support discriminatory bylaws or other acts and resolutions blaming Jews and Israelis for the Hamas massacre. If a student endorses hatred, it isn’t only your right but your duty not to hire him. Do you want your clients represented by someone who condones these monstrous crimes?

You guys are actual fascists. You can see that, right? It is crazy to think that in the year 2023 we have entire industries, media elites, CEOs and the rich and wealthy of DCUM trying to blackball students and activists who believe that it is bad to blow up 2 million Palestinians. Honestly, the thought police here is next level. You guys scare the bejesus out of me. So much for your mantra of Jews being the persecuted class. That's complete BS

Sorry, buddy. Businesses, law firms, and others are starting to wake up to the idea that having SJWs who condone terrorism and destruction might not make the best employees.

It’s about supporting Israel. That is the only thing that matters and will be the sole reason you are hired. Look at MSNBC if you are a muslim they will not hire you.
It is weird for business in the US to base their hiring practices on who supports a Jewish state.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This Berkeley law professor is cautioning law firms from hiring his own students who openly express their support of Hamas and have expressed antisemitism.

If you are a legal employer, when you interview students from Berkeley, Harvard, NYU or any other law school this year, ask them what organizations they belong to. Ask if they support discriminatory bylaws or other acts and resolutions blaming Jews and Israelis for the Hamas massacre. If a student endorses hatred, it isn’t only your right but your duty not to hire him. Do you want your clients represented by someone who condones these monstrous crimes?

You guys are actual fascists. You can see that, right? It is crazy to think that in the year 2023 we have entire industries, media elites, CEOs and the rich and wealthy of DCUM trying to blackball students and activists who believe that it is bad to blow up 2 million Palestinians. Honestly, the thought police here is next level. You guys scare the bejesus out of me. So much for your mantra of Jews being the persecuted class. That's complete BS

Sorry, buddy. Businesses, law firms, and others are starting to wake up to the idea that having SJWs who condone terrorism and destruction might not make the best employees.

It’s about supporting Israel. That is the only thing that matters and will be the sole reason you are hired. Look at MSNBC if you are a muslim they will not hire you.
It is weird for business in the US to base their hiring practices on who supports a Jewish state.

You are wrong, but you know that. Every word you wrote is wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This Berkeley law professor is cautioning law firms from hiring his own students who openly express their support of Hamas and have expressed antisemitism.

If you are a legal employer, when you interview students from Berkeley, Harvard, NYU or any other law school this year, ask them what organizations they belong to. Ask if they support discriminatory bylaws or other acts and resolutions blaming Jews and Israelis for the Hamas massacre. If a student endorses hatred, it isn’t only your right but your duty not to hire him. Do you want your clients represented by someone who condones these monstrous crimes?

You guys are actual fascists. You can see that, right? It is crazy to think that in the year 2023 we have entire industries, media elites, CEOs and the rich and wealthy of DCUM trying to blackball students and activists who believe that it is bad to blow up 2 million Palestinians. Honestly, the thought police here is next level. You guys scare the bejesus out of me. So much for your mantra of Jews being the persecuted class. That's complete BS

Sorry, buddy. Businesses, law firms, and others are starting to wake up to the idea that having SJWs who condone terrorism and destruction might not make the best employees.

It’s about supporting Israel. That is the only thing that matters and will be the sole reason you are hired. Look at MSNBC if you are a muslim they will not hire you.
It is weird for business in the US to base their hiring practices on who supports a Jewish state.

No it’s not about supporting Israel. It’s about not giving people with hateful views, be it racism, anti lgbt, or in this case support of terrorism, a platform.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This Berkeley law professor is cautioning law firms from hiring his own students who openly express their support of Hamas and have expressed antisemitism.

If you are a legal employer, when you interview students from Berkeley, Harvard, NYU or any other law school this year, ask them what organizations they belong to. Ask if they support discriminatory bylaws or other acts and resolutions blaming Jews and Israelis for the Hamas massacre. If a student endorses hatred, it isn’t only your right but your duty not to hire him. Do you want your clients represented by someone who condones these monstrous crimes?

You guys are actual fascists. You can see that, right? It is crazy to think that in the year 2023 we have entire industries, media elites, CEOs and the rich and wealthy of DCUM trying to blackball students and activists who believe that it is bad to blow up 2 million Palestinians. Honestly, the thought police here is next level. You guys scare the bejesus out of me. So much for your mantra of Jews being the persecuted class. That's complete BS

Sorry, buddy. Businesses, law firms, and others are starting to wake up to the idea that having SJWs who condone terrorism and destruction might not make the best employees.

It’s about supporting Israel. That is the only thing that matters and will be the sole reason you are hired. Look at MSNBC if you are a muslim they will not hire you.
It is weird for business in the US to base their hiring practices on who supports a Jewish state.

Wow, this story has certainly grown wings!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Cancelling people for racism is fine.

Cancelling people for celebrating a terrorist attack is fascism and means Jews aren’t actually persecuted.

Got it.

+1

Can't have it both ways.

[Anonymous]

Thanks to Citizens United, “corporations are people” and have first amendment rights.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cancelling people for racism is fine.

Cancelling people for celebrating a terrorist attack is fascism and means Jews aren’t actually persecuted.

Got it.

+1

Can't have it both ways.

I thought we were canceling people for their political affiliation. Is that still OK?

[Anonymous]

I see wealthy jewish folks starting to go to/support schools with medical centers like Chicago, Michigan, and Florida who took an unequivocal stand on the terrorism. While elite schools have large endowments, even Penn has a significant ally lower endowment than Harvard on a per student basis. Large donors are unlikely to give after this past week elites aligned with Republicans and Democrats are both not happy. Schools kind of brought this on themselves when they started releasing political statements mostly after the Trump election.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see wealthy jewish folks starting to go to/support schools with medical centers like Chicago, Michigan, and Florida who took an unequivocal stand on the terrorism. While elite schools have large endowments, even Penn has a significant ally lower endowment than Harvard on a per student basis. Large donors are unlikely to give after this past week elites aligned with Republicans and Democrats are both not happy. Schools kind of brought this on themselves when they started releasing political statements mostly after the Trump election.

As in it's happening now or you foresee it happening in the future?

[Anonymous]

2023’s version of the 1990s sandalistas is scary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cancelling people for racism is fine.

Cancelling people for celebrating a terrorist attack is fascism and means Jews aren’t actually persecuted.

Got it.

+1

Can't have it both ways.

+2

If Huntsman's withrdrawal of his money is such a big nothing, then why did Penn have an emergency meeting of their board of trustees Friday night?

If you don't like the idea of the Hamas supporters getting blackballed by firms, are you also upset anytime a "Karen" from one of those videos loses her job because of a viral video? Do you also get upset when colleges rescind admission offers to students upon discovery of a racist video online?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cancelling people for racism is fine.

Cancelling people for celebrating a terrorist attack is fascism and means Jews aren’t actually persecuted.

Got it.

+1

Can't have it both ways.

I thought we were canceling people for their political affiliation. Is that still OK?

Me personally? I'm an independent and think that a plurality of opinions is delightful, within certain limits.

So no, I wouldn't cancel someone simply due to political affiliation.

However, I would NOT hire someone whose views are antithetical to core civilized values (think the KKK, Jan. 6 rioters, Hamas, etc.).

Simple and consistent.