Not anymore. The preppers broke it. Now they get this new admission system. |
This falsehood doesn't do gen ed students any favors. Or AAP students. |
AAP is not the be all and end all. Back in the 80s and 90s they only took kids with Full Scale IQs of 140. They lowered the bar and now have lots of bright, motivated kids. My child was accepted into Level IV and I did not send her, because we were already in a good school and the center was a long travel away. She did fine in a good FCPS school, did the full IB diploma in high school, got into a selective private university with scholarships where she graduated with honors.
If you live in a weak school district, then push for AAP Level IV. I’ve been in the county for a long time. There are some truly gifted kids there, but many are smart kids from families who provide enrichment as part of parenting. Please don’t pressure your little kid. Please enjoy them for who they are. |
This all used to be true but it isn't anymore. The GBRS rules now. I don't assume that the teachers and AART pick "favorites"? I think that they make some understandable but very biased assumptions that ultimately shape what AAP is like. They give high GBRS to kids that they think will be successful in AAP; in other words, kids who have strong organizational skills and executive functions. This makes sense in a way, given that AAP is an accelerated program, not a gifted program, that really does not present material in any especially different or interesting way. Of course there are exceptions to this rule but overall admission to AAP used to be almost guaranteed with a high CogAt and pretty much guaranteed with a high WISC. Now a mediocre GBRS will overrule those, just as a strong GBRS will overrule mediocre scores. |