The old 132 cutoff was the beginning of the 99th percentile. By definition, 1% of the kids in the US will score a 132 or higher. That is not an easy score to get. So yes, it is impressive. That score does not mean a child belongs in an Advanced class. There are bright kids who lack curiosity or are not motivated to learn. There are bright kids who cannot access the material because of learning issues. Most of the high scoring kids in FCPS are accepted into LIV, I think 2/3 of the in-pool kids are accepted in the first round. Probably more are accepted on appeal. Appeals are there for a reason. The system isn’t perfect but it works pretty well. The reality is LIV isn’t that advanced and kids do fine in gen ed. |
DP. A kid scoring in the 99th percentile who is viewed by the teacher as lacking curiosity or motivation is the type who needs gifted services the most. Bright, curious, motivated kids will thrive anywhere. Gifted kids who are not functioning well in the regular classroom often will turn things around when they're put in a much more challenging and engaging environment. |
I call BS on this poster fwiw. |
That’s fine that you make that choice, but that’s not at all related to my point that the link between PTA parents and AAP has less to do with the PTA part and more to do with genetics/environment. Obviously there are AAP kids with accomplished parents who are not involved with the PTA, because those kids also benefit from their parents genes/knowledge. I think you missed the point. Also, your snark was unnecessary. I also have an advanced degree and am not super involved in the PTA but I sincerely appreciate the efforts of those who do get involved because my child benefits from their efforts. Also, a lot of them have full time jobs with serious responsibilities and I’m not even sure how they do it. |
If we're perfectly realistic and honest, PTA moms probably do get some level of preferential treatment for things like AAP/principal placement. I doubt that schools are giving high GBRS or principal placement to kids who they think would struggle in AAP. But, if the PTA mom's kid is borderline for AAP and would academically be fine in the program, it wouldn't be surprising for that kid to get an inflated GBRS or principal placement. Why bite the hand that feeds you? |
Seriously? Being a PTA member gives your kiddo an upper cut into AAP?
That's pretty pathetic. |
I absolutely do not believe this is true. |
It’s not true. |
Interesting and all good to know. What giftedness literature did you read up on? It's kind of insane to me that a truly gifted kid would have such a hard time getting into the program. Did you prep your child for NNAT, CogAT, etc? Curious if part of the correcting the teacher habit comes from being corrected by parents. |
Is AAP even really that challenging though? Sounds like it isn't for the actually gifted kids. What about the rest? Our schools' standards are so low these days that I find it very hard to believe AAP is that big a deal. Getting in is a different matter. Sounds like getting in is the hard part. |
Even if it were true, I think that's where I'd draw the line. I'm happy to do some prep and encourage my child to be helpful, gracious, etc., etc., but volunteering and ass kissing just to win favor? No thank you. |
It varies. But it is sufficiently challenging for my "actually gifted" kids. |
What kind of work samples? And what do you mean "not hard to achieve without prep"? I rarely hear people stating such scores on this board. Lots of talk of 99th percentile, but that doesn't mean a whole lot given that we are in a very educated part of the country and state. |
Thank you, voice of sanity. This is all we did. These threads are always bananas. |
He did not prep at home other than the 1 week of prep that the general ed teachers did in class for NNAT and CoGAT, and was able to achieve 160NNAT, 144Cogat, 154 WISC (no prep at all), He’s WISC was in the 99.9%, he got into Davidson Institute before was accepted to AAP. So for people who said these scores are impossible to achieve without prep, it’s not true. He did 4th grade Singapore math at home and AOPS on the side, I used those works samples, and he writes short stories and had crazy invention ideas that he wrote down, we used those.
|