A nanny for little kids is a necessity, childcare. A "nanny" for teenagers (who could be working as babysitters themselves) is a glorified driver and maybe a light housekeeper. Complete waste of money. 80K a year for this? "manager" to do what? Manage OP's "staff" and homes like she is living an episode of "Succession"?
She really just needs a driver (or better: figure out carpool) and a weekly house-cleaner. You can order all sorts of food anywhere and don't need to cook these days. OP obviously wants to "retire" to not have to juggle anything, have cushier life, and mainly actually spend time and getting involved with her kids, which "nanny" won't help with. Not because she is a CEO making big bucks and needs a household "manager"
|
I think it reduces to who makes more money, right? In her case DH has a better career and higher compensation. And let's not fool ourselves pretending that husbands would do equally good job managing home, organization, cleaning, outsourcing, and kids. Kid stuff often has an element of social interaction with other parents, which means volunteering, being involved. I've been there and was super frustrated how very little SAHDs were expected to do compared to moms who were working full time. |
| They hear me grindin’ they hating… |