You're not going to be able to watch pr0n in VA without first submitting a PHOTO of yourself

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As PornHub stated, they are complying and most sites will not. So the idea that you will not be able to watch porn is ridiculous. And if you don’t use a VPN you are an idiot especially when surfing porn.

VPN doesn’t work. Just tried it

[Anonymous]

I was able to watch my Sunday morning videos as usual without having to submit a photo.

Whew!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As PornHub stated, they are complying and most sites will not. So the idea that you will not be able to watch porn is ridiculous. And if you don’t use a VPN you are an idiot especially when surfing porn.

VPN doesn’t work. Just tried it

I read a reddit post from a guy in NYC who got blocked because somehow his internet goes through Virginia... Perhaps the same happened to you?

Also noting that there are a few other southern states with this law so you may have to be careful about where your VPN is router.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As PornHub stated, they are complying and most sites will not. So the idea that you will not be able to watch porn is ridiculous. And if you don’t use a VPN you are an idiot especially when surfing porn.

VPN doesn’t work. Just tried it

I read a reddit post from a guy in NYC who got blocked because somehow his internet goes through Virginia... Perhaps the same happened to you?

Also noting that there are a few other southern states with this law so you may have to be careful about where your VPN is router.

Actually seems that without using a VPN his geolocation is sometimes identified as Ashburn and my rudimentary understanding is that there's a lot of internet data that goes through storage facilities in Ashburn. At any rate, seems the impact is potentially more widespread than state residents depending on wifi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony is that people will go back to secret stashes of DVDs and magazines.... Which kids are more likely to find anyways.

It is so accessible online. Teen p**n usage is way up over when we were kids. Please educate yourself. This law is a good thing for kids.

A group of 8 boys were busted using their Chromebooks & document share for porn. They put the photos and vids in a shared doc for months. No parent or school admin would have been any wiser if one boys brother hadn’t ratted him out when he got upset with him.

This was on school issued machines. If kids want to see porn they will find a way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The irony is that people will go back to secret stashes of DVDs and magazines.... Which kids are more likely to find anyways.

It is so accessible online. Teen p**n usage is way up over when we were kids. Please educate yourself. This law is a good thing for kids.

A group of 8 boys were busted using their Chromebooks & document share for porn. They put the photos and vids in a shared doc for months. No parent or school admin would have been any wiser if one boys brother hadn’t ratted him out when he got upset with him.

This was on school issued machines. If kids want to see porn they will find a way.

Genuinely curious, how do we know teen p*rn usage is way up vs just that they are using a different medium than previously for p*rn? Now it's on the internet but growing up you could find magazines or women's erotica either in your older sibling's or parent's stash or at the bookstore. It wasn't difficult for me, a girl growing up in the 80s/90s, to snoop and find it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As PornHub stated, they are complying and most sites will not. So the idea that you will not be able to watch porn is ridiculous. And if you don’t use a VPN you are an idiot especially when surfing porn.

VPN doesn’t work. Just tried it

This means you are too stupid to understand how to use a VPN lol. Embarrassing

[Anonymous]

As a non-religious, moderate conservative, when I clicked on this thread I expected this some idea concocted by a nanny state extreme left-wing politician. It also reminds me why I feel politically homeless and have not voted the past couple of election cycles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As a non-religious, moderate conservative, when I clicked on this thread I expected this some idea concocted by a nanny state extreme left-wing politician. It also reminds me why I feel politically homeless and have not voted the past couple of election cycles.

Nope, passed with bipartisan support.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As PornHub stated, they are complying and most sites will not. So the idea that you will not be able to watch porn is ridiculous. And if you don’t use a VPN you are an idiot especially when surfing porn.

VPN doesn’t work. Just tried it

I read a reddit post from a guy in NYC who got blocked because somehow his internet goes through Virginia... Perhaps the same happened to you?

Also noting that there are a few other southern states with this law so you may have to be careful about where your VPN is router.

Actually seems that without using a VPN his geolocation is sometimes identified as Ashburn and my rudimentary understanding is that there's a lot of internet data that goes through storage facilities in Ashburn. At any rate, seems the impact is potentially more widespread than state residents depending on wifi.

Presumably this makes it ripe for a lawsuit. Interstate commerce and all that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As a non-religious, moderate conservative, when I clicked on this thread I expected this some idea concocted by a nanny state extreme left-wing politician. It also reminds me why I feel politically homeless and have not voted the past couple of election cycles.

Why would you expect that? Conservatives hate the porn.

Initial sponsor was a D though. Passed with bipartisan support. Youngkin signed eagerly.

Your civil rights and privacies…: and the risk of someone collecting those images and getting hacked or used for nefarious purposes is huge.

[Anonymous]

Currently using my cell phone in Florida and "What's my ip?" website Reads as Ashburn Va

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It's interesting how you incorrectly think anyone who doesn't like porn or doesn't support the porn industry in some way is automatically an "anti-sex religious fundamentalist."

Puritan biddie would be more accurate.

No. Person who is concerned about the dehumanizing and exploitative nature of the porn industry, as well as our society’s overconsumption of it.

[Anonymous]

Alternative idea: Porn websites have kiosks where one goes and shows ID similar to a porn store or liquor store purchase. ID is not stored anywhere, but in exchange, one gets a code they can use to access the website which stays active for like 5-10 years.

I'd be more comfortable with this than having my face scanned or uploading a government ID where there's probably a 100% chance of a data breach.

How long before job "background checks" include mining for whether someone accessed a porn website?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As PornHub stated, they are complying and most sites will not. So the idea that you will not be able to watch porn is ridiculous. And if you don’t use a VPN you are an idiot especially when surfing porn.

VPN doesn’t work. Just tried it

I read a reddit post from a guy in NYC who got blocked because somehow his internet goes through Virginia... Perhaps the same happened to you?

Also noting that there are a few other southern states with this law so you may have to be careful about where your VPN is router.

Actually seems that without using a VPN his geolocation is sometimes identified as Ashburn and my rudimentary understanding is that there's a lot of internet data that goes through storage facilities in Ashburn. At any rate, seems the impact is potentially more widespread than state residents depending on wifi.

Presumably this makes it ripe for a lawsuit. Interstate commerce and all that.

Good luck. Sportsbooks and online casinos have, for many years, been relying on presumably similar methods for correctly identifying the state where someone is located (and preventing the use of VPNs to disguise that), and I haven't heard of any lawsuits successfully challenging them on this.