Russia fires missiles into Poland

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can all of you people who want war with Russia just go over there and join the fight instead of trying to drag the rest of us into this?

For the tenth time, no one is going to be drafted to fight a NATO-Russia conflict.

It would take an act of Congress.

No one will be drafted because a NATO vs Russia war will quickly escalate to nuclear weapons and we will all be dead. And those that survive will envy the dead.

Why do countries have nuclear war? This board is full of people spouting “Putin is evil” and “Putin is hitler” rhetoric … um, if you believe that maybe DON’T let us blithely walk into war against him?

Or let me put it this way for the people who can’t seem to snap out of their WW2 fantasies …

If Hitler had access to thousands of thermonuclear weapons as he was surrounded and facing imminent defeat in his bunker in Berlin in 1945, what do you think he would have done?

Why risk this insanity?

So your diplomatic strategy is to now encourage every rogue nation to arm themselves with nuclear weapons under the premise that they get to do whatever they want unchallenged. How do we float your brilliance up to our nation's leadership?

[Anonymous]

Pentagon and DOS cannot confirm.

[Anonymous]

Putin has backed down every time he has been challenged. It is only when the west kowtowed in 2014 when he stole Crimea, that he felt emboldened.

Ukraine is doing a masterful job, but if the world wants this to end now, it will have to take some steps to show Putin we are serious.

His generals do not want to launch nukes. Neither to we, or anyone else.

Take out his forward, offensive capabilities and the Ukraine war ends sooner rather than later, because Putin will be forced out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can all of you people who want war with Russia just go over there and join the fight instead of trying to drag the rest of us into this?

For the tenth time, no one is going to be drafted to fight a NATO-Russia conflict.

It would take an act of Congress.

No one will be drafted because a NATO vs Russia war will quickly escalate to nuclear weapons and we will all be dead. And those that survive will envy the dead.

Why do countries have nuclear war? This board is full of people spouting “Putin is evil” and “Putin is hitler” rhetoric … um, if you believe that maybe DON’T let us blithely walk into war against him?

Or let me put it this way for the people who can’t seem to snap out of their WW2 fantasies …

If Hitler had access to thousands of thermonuclear weapons as he was surrounded and facing imminent defeat in his bunker in Berlin in 1945, what do you think he would have done?

Why risk this insanity?

ok so if Putin wants to take over the US I guess we should let him or else he'll nuke the US and we'd be dead. Better to live under Putin's regime than be dead, right?

No - we save nuclear weapons ONLY for use as necessary to save the nation from an existential threat. So, if any country launched and invasion of the United States (laughably insane) AND if conventional forces couldn’t stop them, only then would use of nuclear weapons be on the table.

What people need is EMPATHY with Russia. Not sympathy — empathy. Put yourself in their shoes. They are fighting a war on their border. If we push their backs against the wall with overwhelming them by conventional forces — that’s an existential threat to them - that’s precisely when they would use nuclear weapons. The war is way, way, way more important for Russia - it’s existential for them. We should be doing all we can to DEESCALATE this.

Because I really don’t want my family to die for Donbass.

Again, all you people with the overwrought Putin-as-Hitler tropes don’t seem to be asking the obvious question: what would Hitler have done with thousands of thermonuclear weapons? What would he have done if the German state was collapsing and he knew he would soon be killed and all he had to do was push a button and bring the whole temple down like Samson?

Think, people.

[Anonymous]

OK darlings, remember you've heard it here first.

What fell down on the Polish border is a fragment of a Russian missile intercepted by Ukraine.

The West will not confirm this was a targeted shot by Russia. Pentagon will say it wants all the facts and it will peter out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can all of you people who want war with Russia just go over there and join the fight instead of trying to drag the rest of us into this?

For the tenth time, no one is going to be drafted to fight a NATO-Russia conflict.

It would take an act of Congress.

No one will be drafted because a NATO vs Russia war will quickly escalate to nuclear weapons and we will all be dead. And those that survive will envy the dead.

Why do countries have nuclear war? This board is full of people spouting “Putin is evil” and “Putin is hitler” rhetoric … um, if you believe that maybe DON’T let us blithely walk into war against him?

Or let me put it this way for the people who can’t seem to snap out of their WW2 fantasies …

If Hitler had access to thousands of thermonuclear weapons as he was surrounded and facing imminent defeat in his bunker in Berlin in 1945, what do you think he would have done?

Why risk this insanity?

ok so if Putin wants to take over the US I guess we should let him or else he'll nuke the US and we'd be dead. Better to live under Putin's regime than be dead, right?

No - we save nuclear weapons ONLY for use as necessary to save the nation from an existential threat. So, if any country launched and invasion of the United States (laughably insane) AND if conventional forces couldn’t stop them, only then would use of nuclear weapons be on the table.

What people need is EMPATHY with Russia. Not sympathy — empathy. Put yourself in their shoes. They are fighting a war on their border. If we push their backs against the wall with overwhelming them by conventional forces — that’s an existential threat to them - that’s precisely when they would use nuclear weapons. The war is way, way, way more important for Russia - it’s existential for them. We should be doing all we can to DEESCALATE this.

Because I really don’t want my family to die for Donbass.

Again, all you people with the overwrought Putin-as-Hitler tropes don’t seem to be asking the obvious question: what would Hitler have done with thousands of thermonuclear weapons? What would he have done if the German state was collapsing and he knew he would soon be killed and all he had to do was push a button and bring the whole temple down like Samson?

Think, people.

LOL.. this is where you lose the plot.

If the world knew Hitler had nukes and was going to use them, we'd have taken him out.

I don't know if you are a "real" American or not, but you don't sound like one. More like a Putin apologist than an American.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you want your entire family vaporized in a nuclear holocaust, my little DC Urban Moms and Dads friends?

If not, you need to let your voice be heard -- tell "our" government to STOP MESSING AROUND WITH RISKING WORLD WAR 3 for some godforsaken border somewhere in a corrupt country that most people cannot even find on a map.

This. Is. Insane.

NO WAR FOR UKRAINE
NO WAR FOR POLAND

My American children deserve LIFE.

Sorry, but the US has a commitment to its NATO allies. Your naïveté is shocking. Do you not know how WWII started? Germany and Russia invaded Poland while the world turned a blind eye. Never again.

Also, never forget how many Soviet Jews were killed by the Germans.
Never forget Kursk.
Never forget Stalingrad.
Russians killed the most German troops: 75%

And never forget Katyn. Please, use diplomacy to bring this to an end

Never forget the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact or the Munich Agreement of 1938.

Never forget that Russia would have been defeated without convoys of supplies and military hardware from the US.

Never forget Stalin’s love for “rootless cosmopolitans” snd “Zionists” sent to the gulags.

Never forget that an untold number of Russians, Poles, Hungarians, Slovakians, Ukrainians, Bulgarians, Serbs, Georgians, Latvians, Estonians and Lithuanians — not to mention French, Belgians, Dutch, Danes, Norwegians and Finns — collaborated with the Nazis and were complicit in the Holocaust.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can all of you people who want war with Russia just go over there and join the fight instead of trying to drag the rest of us into this?

For the tenth time, no one is going to be drafted to fight a NATO-Russia conflict.

It would take an act of Congress.

No one will be drafted because a NATO vs Russia war will quickly escalate to nuclear weapons and we will all be dead. And those that survive will envy the dead.

Why do countries have nuclear war? This board is full of people spouting “Putin is evil” and “Putin is hitler” rhetoric … um, if you believe that maybe DON’T let us blithely walk into war against him?

Or let me put it this way for the people who can’t seem to snap out of their WW2 fantasies …

If Hitler had access to thousands of thermonuclear weapons as he was surrounded and facing imminent defeat in his bunker in Berlin in 1945, what do you think he would have done?

Why risk this insanity?

ok so if Putin wants to take over the US I guess we should let him or else he'll nuke the US and we'd be dead. Better to live under Putin's regime than be dead, right?

No - we save nuclear weapons ONLY for use as necessary to save the nation from an existential threat. So, if any country launched and invasion of the United States (laughably insane) AND if conventional forces couldn’t stop them, only then would use of nuclear weapons be on the table.

What people need is EMPATHY with Russia. Not sympathy — empathy. Put yourself in their shoes. They are fighting a war on their border. If we push their backs against the wall with overwhelming them by conventional forces — that’s an existential threat to them - that’s precisely when they would use nuclear weapons. The war is way, way, way more important for Russia - it’s existential for them. We should be doing all we can to DEESCALATE this.

Because I really don’t want my family to die for Donbass.

Again, all you people with the overwrought Putin-as-Hitler tropes don’t seem to be asking the obvious question: what would Hitler have done with thousands of thermonuclear weapons? What would he have done if the German state was collapsing and he knew he would soon be killed and all he had to do was push a button and bring the whole temple down like Samson?

Think, people.

this is such emotionally manipulative bull shite you child of putin

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can all of you people who want war with Russia just go over there and join the fight instead of trying to drag the rest of us into this?

For the tenth time, no one is going to be drafted to fight a NATO-Russia conflict.

It would take an act of Congress.

No one will be drafted because a NATO vs Russia war will quickly escalate to nuclear weapons and we will all be dead. And those that survive will envy the dead.

Why do countries have nuclear war? This board is full of people spouting “Putin is evil” and “Putin is hitler” rhetoric … um, if you believe that maybe DON’T let us blithely walk into war against him?

Or let me put it this way for the people who can’t seem to snap out of their WW2 fantasies …

If Hitler had access to thousands of thermonuclear weapons as he was surrounded and facing imminent defeat in his bunker in Berlin in 1945, what do you think he would have done?

Why risk this insanity?

ok so if Putin wants to take over the US I guess we should let him or else he'll nuke the US and we'd be dead. Better to live under Putin's regime than be dead, right?

No - we save nuclear weapons ONLY for use as necessary to save the nation from an existential threat. So, if any country launched and invasion of the United States (laughably insane) AND if conventional forces couldn’t stop them, only then would use of nuclear weapons be on the table.

What people need is EMPATHY with Russia. Not sympathy — empathy. Put yourself in their shoes. They are fighting a war on their border. If we push their backs against the wall with overwhelming them by conventional forces — that’s an existential threat to them - that’s precisely when they would use nuclear weapons. The war is way, way, way more important for Russia - it’s existential for them. We should be doing all we can to DEESCALATE this.

Because I really don’t want my family to die for Donbass.

Again, all you people with the overwrought Putin-as-Hitler tropes don’t seem to be asking the obvious question: what would Hitler have done with thousands of thermonuclear weapons? What would he have done if the German state was collapsing and he knew he would soon be killed and all he had to do was push a button and bring the whole temple down like Samson?

Think, people.

That's not why we used them last time.

Do you know that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can all of you people who want war with Russia just go over there and join the fight instead of trying to drag the rest of us into this?

For the tenth time, no one is going to be drafted to fight a NATO-Russia conflict.

It would take an act of Congress.

No one will be drafted because a NATO vs Russia war will quickly escalate to nuclear weapons and we will all be dead. And those that survive will envy the dead.

Why do countries have nuclear war? This board is full of people spouting “Putin is evil” and “Putin is hitler” rhetoric … um, if you believe that maybe DON’T let us blithely walk into war against him?

Or let me put it this way for the people who can’t seem to snap out of their WW2 fantasies …

If Hitler had access to thousands of thermonuclear weapons as he was surrounded and facing imminent defeat in his bunker in Berlin in 1945, what do you think he would have done?

Why risk this insanity?

ok so if Putin wants to take over the US I guess we should let him or else he'll nuke the US and we'd be dead. Better to live under Putin's regime than be dead, right?

No - we save nuclear weapons ONLY for use as necessary to save the nation from an existential threat. So, if any country launched and invasion of the United States (laughably insane) AND if conventional forces couldn’t stop them, only then would use of nuclear weapons be on the table.

What people need is EMPATHY with Russia. Not sympathy — empathy. Put yourself in their shoes. They are fighting a war on their border. If we push their backs against the wall with overwhelming them by conventional forces — that’s an existential threat to them - that’s precisely when they would use nuclear weapons. The war is way, way, way more important for Russia - it’s existential for them. We should be doing all we can to DEESCALATE this.

Because I really don’t want my family to die for Donbass.

Again, all you people with the overwrought Putin-as-Hitler tropes don’t seem to be asking the obvious question: what would Hitler have done with thousands of thermonuclear weapons? What would he have done if the German state was collapsing and he knew he would soon be killed and all he had to do was push a button and bring the whole temple down like Samson?

Think, people.

Empathy? You're a simple-minded clown. Aside, they 'started' a war on their border.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can all of you people who want war with Russia just go over there and join the fight instead of trying to drag the rest of us into this?

For the tenth time, no one is going to be drafted to fight a NATO-Russia conflict.

It would take an act of Congress.

No one will be drafted because a NATO vs Russia war will quickly escalate to nuclear weapons and we will all be dead. And those that survive will envy the dead.

Why do countries have nuclear war? This board is full of people spouting “Putin is evil” and “Putin is hitler” rhetoric … um, if you believe that maybe DON’T let us blithely walk into war against him?

Or let me put it this way for the people who can’t seem to snap out of their WW2 fantasies …

If Hitler had access to thousands of thermonuclear weapons as he was surrounded and facing imminent defeat in his bunker in Berlin in 1945, what do you think he would have done?

Why risk this insanity?

ok so if Putin wants to take over the US I guess we should let him or else he'll nuke the US and we'd be dead. Better to live under Putin's regime than be dead, right?

If it’s that important push your kid to join the army. Otherwise you’re just talking out your butt.

so, you are saying that if Putin wants to take over the US you'd just let him cause you don't want your kids to possibly die? Yes?

I’d want the rich to send their kids first to prove solidarity and a chance to win. Otherwise forget it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can all of you people who want war with Russia just go over there and join the fight instead of trying to drag the rest of us into this?

For the tenth time, no one is going to be drafted to fight a NATO-Russia conflict.

It would take an act of Congress.

No one will be drafted because a NATO vs Russia war will quickly escalate to nuclear weapons and we will all be dead. And those that survive will envy the dead.

Why do countries have nuclear war? This board is full of people spouting “Putin is evil” and “Putin is hitler” rhetoric … um, if you believe that maybe DON’T let us blithely walk into war against him?

Or let me put it this way for the people who can’t seem to snap out of their WW2 fantasies …

If Hitler had access to thousands of thermonuclear weapons as he was surrounded and facing imminent defeat in his bunker in Berlin in 1945, what do you think he would have done?

Why risk this insanity?

ok so if Putin wants to take over the US I guess we should let him or else he'll nuke the US and we'd be dead. Better to live under Putin's regime than be dead, right?

No - we save nuclear weapons ONLY for use as necessary to save the nation from an existential threat. So, if any country launched and invasion of the United States (laughably insane) AND if conventional forces couldn’t stop them, only then would use of nuclear weapons be on the table.

What people need is EMPATHY with Russia. Not sympathy — empathy. Put yourself in their shoes. They are fighting a war on their border. If we push their backs against the wall with overwhelming them by conventional forces — that’s an existential threat to them - that’s precisely when they would use nuclear weapons. The war is way, way, way more important for Russia - it’s existential for them. We should be doing all we can to DEESCALATE this.

Because I really don’t want my family to die for Donbass.

Again, all you people with the overwrought Putin-as-Hitler tropes don’t seem to be asking the obvious question: what would Hitler have done with thousands of thermonuclear weapons? What would he have done if the German state was collapsing and he knew he would soon be killed and all he had to do was push a button and bring the whole temple down like Samson?

Think, people.

LOL. You need to workshop your screed with an audience outside the Kremlin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you want your entire family vaporized in a nuclear holocaust, my little DC Urban Moms and Dads friends?

If not, you need to let your voice be heard -- tell "our" government to STOP MESSING AROUND WITH RISKING WORLD WAR 3 for some godforsaken border somewhere in a corrupt country that most people cannot even find on a map.

This. Is. Insane.

NO WAR FOR UKRAINE
NO WAR FOR POLAND

My American children deserve LIFE.

Sorry, but the US has a commitment to its NATO allies. Your naïveté is shocking. Do you not know how WWII started? Germany and Russia invaded Poland while the world turned a blind eye. Never again.

Also, never forget how many Soviet Jews were killed by the Germans.
Never forget Kursk.
Never forget Stalingrad.
Russians killed the most German troops: 75%

And never forget Katyn. Please, use diplomacy to bring this to an end

Never forget the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact or the Munich Agreement of 1938.

Never forget that Russia would have been defeated without convoys of supplies and military hardware from the US.

Never forget Stalin’s love for “rootless cosmopolitans” snd “Zionists” sent to the gulags.

Never forget that an untold number of Russians, Poles, Hungarians, Slovakians, Ukrainians, Bulgarians, Serbs, Georgians, Latvians, Estonians and Lithuanians — not to mention French, Belgians, Dutch, Danes, Norwegians and Finns — collaborated with the Nazis and were complicit in the Holocaust.

LOL my dear in your rush to list all the collaborators you missed two big groups. Yuge ones!

1) Ukrainians, with whose hands the Babiy Yar massacre was carried out, and

2) Americans, who after the war took dozens of Nazi scientists and commanders to the US and gave them nice cushy jobs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can all of you people who want war with Russia just go over there and join the fight instead of trying to drag the rest of us into this?

For the tenth time, no one is going to be drafted to fight a NATO-Russia conflict.

It would take an act of Congress.

No one will be drafted because a NATO vs Russia war will quickly escalate to nuclear weapons and we will all be dead. And those that survive will envy the dead.

Why do countries have nuclear war? This board is full of people spouting “Putin is evil” and “Putin is hitler” rhetoric … um, if you believe that maybe DON’T let us blithely walk into war against him?

Or let me put it this way for the people who can’t seem to snap out of their WW2 fantasies …

If Hitler had access to thousands of thermonuclear weapons as he was surrounded and facing imminent defeat in his bunker in Berlin in 1945, what do you think he would have done?

Why risk this insanity?

ok so if Putin wants to take over the US I guess we should let him or else he'll nuke the US and we'd be dead. Better to live under Putin's regime than be dead, right?

No - we save nuclear weapons ONLY for use as necessary to save the nation from an existential threat. So, if any country launched and invasion of the United States (laughably insane) AND if conventional forces couldn’t stop them, only then would use of nuclear weapons be on the table.

What people need is EMPATHY with Russia. Not sympathy — empathy. Put yourself in their shoes. They are fighting a war on their border. If we push their backs against the wall with overwhelming them by conventional forces — that’s an existential threat to them - that’s precisely when they would use nuclear weapons. The war is way, way, way more important for Russia - it’s existential for them. We should be doing all we can to DEESCALATE this.

Because I really don’t want my family to die for Donbass.

Again, all you people with the overwrought Putin-as-Hitler tropes don’t seem to be asking the obvious question: what would Hitler have done with thousands of thermonuclear weapons? What would he have done if the German state was collapsing and he knew he would soon be killed and all he had to do was push a button and bring the whole temple down like Samson?

Think, people.

Empathy? You're a simple-minded clown. Aside, they 'started' a war on their border.

Tell me you don't know anyone from Donetsk without telling me you don't know anyone from Donetsk.

[Anonymous]

Empathy with Russia. Snort. If they don't like what's happening on their border they could STOP ATTACKING UKRAINE