Will Jennifer Wexton lose???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hung Cao terrifies me. He attends Cornerstone Chapel, which regularly has ultra conservative political speakers and sermons about the horror of gay marriage. His wife homeschools their kids, but he's forever going on and on about how terrible the schools are. I'm not sure he realizes that Congress isn't in charge of LCPS.

And about abortion? Here's a clip: https://twitter.com/v_theclash/status/1569354721479073792''

This "terrifies" you? That the man has a strong faith and that they care enough about their kids to make the choice to homeschool?

Wow. Weak much?

If given the chance, he will vote to make abortion illegal nationwide. Yes. Especially as the mother of daughters, this terrifies me.

[Anonymous]

The disdain with which Jennifer Wexton refers to families says it all. I’d like to get rid of this ruling class of Democrats who operate from the assumption that they always know better than parents when it comes to raising children.

[Anonymous]

no way Waxon wins, 10th was D+2 last year before inflation hit.
I wouldn't be surprised if it is R+2 this time around. Independent have made even more of a swing to R in the past 12 months.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was all set to vote for Cao until I found out he’s an election denier. If there’s no Libertarian running, I guess I’ll leave my ballot blank.

I am a moderate voter in VA 10 who also could have voted for Hung Cao, but I cannot see my way to voting for an election denier and someone that refers to the insurrectionists as his people. If Wexton hangs on, Republicans need to think about their strategy. There are a lot of us in the swing districts who don’t particularly love the Dems that could be persuaded to cast our votes for your non-Trumpy candidates. But if you make us choose between a Trumper and a more moderate Dem, we feel like we have no choice but to choose the more moderate Dem.

Vega and Cao winning would signal the end of moderate candidates in swing districts. Spanberger and Wexton are towards the center of the aisle and both are running against candidates who are towards the extreme edge of their party. If they lose, what is the point of running moderates?

Gee— Maybe because you want a chance in h$llof winning in the future?

— moderate Dem

[Anonymous]

They moved GF to the 11th to ensure a Wexton win

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They moved GF to the 11th to ensure a Wexton win

Yeah, but the 10th lost the part of McLean it had and now has Warrenton and even some of Spotsy.

[Anonymous]

I’m not a fan of Hung Cao’s signs with crosshairs behind his name. I am not voting for someone who glorifies gun culture.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hung Cao terrifies me. He attends Cornerstone Chapel, which regularly has ultra conservative political speakers and sermons about the horror of gay marriage. His wife homeschools their kids, but he's forever going on and on about how terrible the schools are. I'm not sure he realizes that Congress isn't in charge of LCPS.

And about abortion? Here's a clip: https://twitter.com/v_theclash/status/1569354721479073792''

This "terrifies" you? That the man has a strong faith and that they care enough about their kids to make the choice to homeschool?

Wow. Weak much?

DP, he is entitled to his religious beliefs, and to follow them in his own private life. But I don’t want anyone imposing their religious beliefs on my health and body.

What beliefs are legislators allowed to impose? Why can’t they legislate in conformity to their religious worldview?

Are you familiar with the principle of separation of Church and State? It’s a metaphor that Thomas Jefferson used.

Well, my religion says murder is wrong. Should I just ignore that in favor of survival of the fittest?

If the ONLY reason you want to outlaw murder is because it is in the Bible that it is bad then I would be disinclined to vote for you. I like to vote for candidates who legislate based on actual morality/ ethical standpoints rather than ones written in a book two thousand years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m not a fan of Hung Cao’s signs with crosshairs behind his name. I am not voting for someone who glorifies gun culture.

He’s a military veteran. Those guns saved lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not a fan of Hung Cao’s signs with crosshairs behind his name. I am not voting for someone who glorifies gun culture.

He’s a military veteran. Those guns saved lives.

Yeah I'm sure that's the only reason Cao is using that imagery. Not to signal to the crazy 2A nuts who think they should collect assault weapons that he is on "their side".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not a fan of Hung Cao’s signs with crosshairs behind his name. I am not voting for someone who glorifies gun culture.

He’s a military veteran. Those guns saved lives.

He was in the Navy. He didn't carry any guns there, he just likes them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hung Cao terrifies me. He attends Cornerstone Chapel, which regularly has ultra conservative political speakers and sermons about the horror of gay marriage. His wife homeschools their kids, but he's forever going on and on about how terrible the schools are. I'm not sure he realizes that Congress isn't in charge of LCPS.

And about abortion? Here's a clip: https://twitter.com/v_theclash/status/1569354721479073792''

He also doesn't care about any of those issues. He's only interested in National security policy because he thinks his 20 yrs in the Navy made him an expert on it. I know this for a fact because I actually know him. He's running because he is very conceited and thinks very highly of himself. He's not going to do anything for his constituents or be available.

[Anonymous]

Someone needs to put these people on notice, and they are too comfortable and lazy as our areas mindlessly hits vote blue. She has not done anything significant except ensure she get re-elected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hung Cao terrifies me. He attends Cornerstone Chapel, which regularly has ultra conservative political speakers and sermons about the horror of gay marriage. His wife homeschools their kids, but he's forever going on and on about how terrible the schools are. I'm not sure he realizes that Congress isn't in charge of LCPS.

And about abortion? Here's a clip: https://twitter.com/v_theclash/status/1569354721479073792''

He also doesn't care about any of those issues. He's only interested in National security policy because he thinks his 20 yrs in the Navy made him an expert on it. I know this for a fact because I actually know him. He's running because he is very conceited and thinks very highly of himself. He's not going to do anything for his constituents or be available.

I would tend to think 20 years in the Navy made Cao more of an expert on national security than four years as a prosecutor made Wexton an expert on the judiciary system, but it certainly hasn't stopped her from holding forth like she's RBG reincarnated. She's a total lightweight, and it's not like she's served in the House so long that she has any meaningful seniority.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hung Cao terrifies me. He attends Cornerstone Chapel, which regularly has ultra conservative political speakers and sermons about the horror of gay marriage. His wife homeschools their kids, but he's forever going on and on about how terrible the schools are. I'm not sure he realizes that Congress isn't in charge of LCPS.

And about abortion? Here's a clip: https://twitter.com/v_theclash/status/1569354721479073792''

He also doesn't care about any of those issues. He's only interested in National security policy because he thinks his 20 yrs in the Navy made him an expert on it. I know this for a fact because I actually know him. He's running because he is very conceited and thinks very highly of himself. He's not going to do anything for his constituents or be available.

I would tend to think 20 years in the Navy made Cao more of an expert on national security than four years as a prosecutor made Wexton an expert on the judiciary system, but it certainly hasn't stopped her from holding forth like she's RBG reincarnated. She's a total lightweight, and it's not like she's served in the House so long that she has any meaningful seniority.

She was also in the State Senate for years.