TJ admissions decision - repercussions for Class of 2026

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"'failure to grant this would cause significant operational disruptions for TJ ahead of the next school year, including hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments and the development of curriculum'”

This doesn’t make sense to me. Is FCPS thinking about shutting down TJ? The students are academically of the same caliber under the new system. Why would there be much difference to hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments, and curriculum, esp for 9th grade classes?

When did FCPS even need any sense? All they need is to have liberals vote them in for them to become the dictator.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"'failure to grant this would cause significant operational disruptions for TJ ahead of the next school year, including hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments and the development of curriculum'”

This doesn’t make sense to me. Is FCPS thinking about shutting down TJ? The students are academically of the same caliber under the new system. Why would there be much difference to hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments, and curriculum, esp for 9th grade classes?

When did FCPS even need any sense? All they need is to have liberals vote them in for them to become the dictator.

I think it’s a signal that complying with the injunction may preclude them from selecting an incoming class this year, or might otherwise have drastic effects on the size and scope of any incoming class.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"'failure to grant this would cause significant operational disruptions for TJ ahead of the next school year, including hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments and the development of curriculum'”

This doesn’t make sense to me. Is FCPS thinking about shutting down TJ? The students are academically of the same caliber under the new system. Why would there be much difference to hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments, and curriculum, esp for 9th grade classes?

Legal tactic. But they didn't care about the disruptions to the class of 2025. So why now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"'failure to grant this would cause significant operational disruptions for TJ ahead of the next school year, including hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments and the development of curriculum'”

This doesn’t make sense to me. Is FCPS thinking about shutting down TJ? The students are academically of the same caliber under the new system. Why would there be much difference to hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments, and curriculum, esp for 9th grade classes?

When did FCPS even need any sense? All they need is to have liberals vote them in for them to become the dictator.

Oh I hate those liberals and their democracy! They are always far too concerned with others and not doing what benefits me!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"'failure to grant this would cause significant operational disruptions for TJ ahead of the next school year, including hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments and the development of curriculum'”

This doesn’t make sense to me. Is FCPS thinking about shutting down TJ? The students are academically of the same caliber under the new system. Why would there be much difference to hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments, and curriculum, esp for 9th grade classes?

Legal tactic. But they didn't care about the disruptions to the class of 2025. So why now?

The new system seemed to be fairer to all areas not just hose wealthy parts of the county that can afford to spend $10k on prep and the kids selected may be less prepped but seemed to struggle less once they were at TJ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"'failure to grant this would cause significant operational disruptions for TJ ahead of the next school year, including hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments and the development of curriculum'”

This doesn’t make sense to me. Is FCPS thinking about shutting down TJ? The students are academically of the same caliber under the new system. Why would there be much difference to hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments, and curriculum, esp for 9th grade classes?

Legal tactic. But they didn't care about the disruptions to the class of 2025. So why now?

The new system seemed to be fairer to all areas not just hose wealthy parts of the county that can afford to spend $10k on prep and the kids selected may be less prepped but seemed to struggle less once they were at TJ.

You can stop with that talking points. Seen it plastered dozens of times. Spout some original thought if you have any.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"'failure to grant this would cause significant operational disruptions for TJ ahead of the next school year, including hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments and the development of curriculum'”

This doesn’t make sense to me. Is FCPS thinking about shutting down TJ? The students are academically of the same caliber under the new system. Why would there be much difference to hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments, and curriculum, esp for 9th grade classes?

This is just my take, as a parent with a kid going to MS next year. Every communication involving course selections emphasizes that this is binding, as they make staffing decisions, resource allocation, and a whole host of other decisions on the basis of that. I can see a snowball effect, in that getting a new selection process in place will delay seating a class, which will delay course selections and decisions on staffing, and … “significant disruption”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"'failure to grant this would cause significant operational disruptions for TJ ahead of the next school year, including hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments and the development of curriculum'”

This doesn’t make sense to me. Is FCPS thinking about shutting down TJ? The students are academically of the same caliber under the new system. Why would there be much difference to hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments, and curriculum, esp for 9th grade classes?

When did FCPS even need any sense? All they need is to have liberals vote them in for them to become the dictator.

Oh I hate those liberals and their democracy! They are always far too concerned with others and not doing what benefits me!

Yes, why are those libturds always looking out for other people? Don't they know it's always all about me, me, ME!

[Anonymous]

The Coalition for TJ is claiming that the judge asked FCPS in the fall to prepare an alternate admissions process for the class of 2026 in case the new process was thrown out. FCPS apparently AGREED to this request to be prepared back in the fall.

1) Is this accurate?

2) If yes to the above, it seems like the “stay” request is incredibly poorly written and the strategy is all wrong. It is going to the Judge that issued the order to stop using the new system. This is the same judge that asked them to be prepared with an alternate system. It doesn’t look like the FCPS stay request acknowledges that they agreed to be prepared.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"'failure to grant this would cause significant operational disruptions for TJ ahead of the next school year, including hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments and the development of curriculum'”

This doesn’t make sense to me. Is FCPS thinking about shutting down TJ? The students are academically of the same caliber under the new system. Why would there be much difference to hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments, and curriculum, esp for 9th grade classes?

When did FCPS even need any sense? All they need is to have liberals vote them in for them to become the dictator.

Oh I hate those liberals and their democracy! They are always far too concerned with others and not doing what benefits me!

Yes, why are those libturds always looking out for other people? Don't they know it's always all about me, me, ME!

Looking out for others? Is that why white student numbers increased as the result of the TJ reform? Who are you trying to fool?
You racists should really get some new lies. That s* is getting way too old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"'failure to grant this would cause significant operational disruptions for TJ ahead of the next school year, including hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments and the development of curriculum'”

This doesn’t make sense to me. Is FCPS thinking about shutting down TJ? The students are academically of the same caliber under the new system. Why would there be much difference to hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments, and curriculum, esp for 9th grade classes?

Legal tactic. But they didn't care about the disruptions to the class of 2025. So why now?

The new system seemed to be fairer to all areas not just hose wealthy parts of the county that can afford to spend $10k on prep and the kids selected may be less prepped but seemed to struggle less once they were at TJ.

You can stop with that talking points. Seen it plastered dozens of times. Spout some original thought if you have any.

I wonder what would have happened with the admissions reform if FCPS had approached it from a “prep” standpoint vs racial justice?

Curie Learning Center publicly stating on their FB page that 133 of their students were admitted to the class of 2024 and listed our first and last names. There was some rumblings apparently that some kids had seen the test ahead of time, but I don’t think that was ever clear if it was accurate. I personally don’t have an issue with prep, but curious as to why the FCPS school board didn’t say that they wanted to level the playing field by addressing the issue that prepping seemed to be trending as a defacto requirement for admission? Race is clearly extremely problematic from a legal standpoint, but prep isn’t. (Unless it’s being used as a proxy for race of course.)

Overall, it’s just embarrassing how incompetent the school board is. They managed to make both sides furious.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"'failure to grant this would cause significant operational disruptions for TJ ahead of the next school year, including hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments and the development of curriculum'”

This doesn’t make sense to me. Is FCPS thinking about shutting down TJ? The students are academically of the same caliber under the new system. Why would there be much difference to hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments, and curriculum, esp for 9th grade classes?

Legal tactic. But they didn't care about the disruptions to the class of 2025. So why now?

The new system seemed to be fairer to all areas not just hose wealthy parts of the county that can afford to spend $10k on prep and the kids selected may be less prepped but seemed to struggle less once they were at TJ.

Oh so true!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"'failure to grant this would cause significant operational disruptions for TJ ahead of the next school year, including hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments and the development of curriculum'”

This doesn’t make sense to me. Is FCPS thinking about shutting down TJ? The students are academically of the same caliber under the new system. Why would there be much difference to hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments, and curriculum, esp for 9th grade classes?

Legal tactic. But they didn't care about the disruptions to the class of 2025. So why now?

The new system seemed to be fairer to all areas not just hose wealthy parts of the county that can afford to spend $10k on prep and the kids selected may be less prepped but seemed to struggle less once they were at TJ.

You can stop with that talking points. Seen it plastered dozens of times. Spout some original thought if you have any.

I wonder what would have happened with the admissions reform if FCPS had approached it from a “prep” standpoint vs racial justice?

Curie Learning Center publicly stating on their FB page that 133 of their students were admitted to the class of 2024 and listed our first and last names. There was some rumblings apparently that some kids had seen the test ahead of time, but I don’t think that was ever clear if it was accurate. I personally don’t have an issue with prep, but curious as to why the FCPS school board didn’t say that they wanted to level the playing field by addressing the issue that prepping seemed to be trending as a defacto requirement for admission? Race is clearly extremely problematic from a legal standpoint, but prep isn’t. (Unless it’s being used as a proxy for race of course.)

Overall, it’s just embarrassing how incompetent the school board is. They managed to make both sides furious.

Yes, Curie attendees made up a third of the admitted class but between them and the other prep centers apparently it was the majority of students. In fact, people who didn't prep had a slim chance of admission apparently. It seems like a way to keep out the poor and cater to the wealthy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"'failure to grant this would cause significant operational disruptions for TJ ahead of the next school year, including hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments and the development of curriculum'”

This doesn’t make sense to me. Is FCPS thinking about shutting down TJ? The students are academically of the same caliber under the new system. Why would there be much difference to hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments, and curriculum, esp for 9th grade classes?

Legal tactic. But they didn't care about the disruptions to the class of 2025. So why now?

The new system seemed to be fairer to all areas not just hose wealthy parts of the county that can afford to spend $10k on prep and the kids selected may be less prepped but seemed to struggle less once they were at TJ.

You can stop with that talking points. Seen it plastered dozens of times. Spout some original thought if you have any.

I wonder what would have happened with the admissions reform if FCPS had approached it from a “prep” standpoint vs racial justice?

Curie Learning Center publicly stating on their FB page that 133 of their students were admitted to the class of 2024 and listed our first and last names. There was some rumblings apparently that some kids had seen the test ahead of time, but I don’t think that was ever clear if it was accurate. I personally don’t have an issue with prep, but curious as to why the FCPS school board didn’t say that they wanted to level the playing field by addressing the issue that prepping seemed to be trending as a defacto requirement for admission? Race is clearly extremely problematic from a legal standpoint, but prep isn’t. (Unless it’s being used as a proxy for race of course.)

Overall, it’s just embarrassing how incompetent the school board is. They managed to make both sides furious.

Yes, Curie attendees made up a third of the admitted class but between them and the other prep centers apparently it was the majority of students. In fact, people who didn't prep had a slim chance of admission apparently. It seems like a way to keep out the poor and cater to the wealthy.

There were rumors that some students bought the test even.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"'failure to grant this would cause significant operational disruptions for TJ ahead of the next school year, including hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments and the development of curriculum'”

This doesn’t make sense to me. Is FCPS thinking about shutting down TJ? The students are academically of the same caliber under the new system. Why would there be much difference to hiring decisions, course selections, teaching assignments, and curriculum, esp for 9th grade classes?

Legal tactic. But they didn't care about the disruptions to the class of 2025. So why now?

The new system seemed to be fairer to all areas not just hose wealthy parts of the county that can afford to spend $10k on prep and the kids selected may be less prepped but seemed to struggle less once they were at TJ.

You can stop with that talking points. Seen it plastered dozens of times. Spout some original thought if you have any.

I wonder what would have happened with the admissions reform if FCPS had approached it from a “prep” standpoint vs racial justice?

Curie Learning Center publicly stating on their FB page that 133 of their students were admitted to the class of 2024 and listed our first and last names. There was some rumblings apparently that some kids had seen the test ahead of time, but I don’t think that was ever clear if it was accurate. I personally don’t have an issue with prep, but curious as to why the FCPS school board didn’t say that they wanted to level the playing field by addressing the issue that prepping seemed to be trending as a defacto requirement for admission? Race is clearly extremely problematic from a legal standpoint, but prep isn’t. (Unless it’s being used as a proxy for race of course.)

Overall, it’s just embarrassing how incompetent the school board is. They managed to make both sides furious.

Yes, Curie attendees made up a third of the admitted class but between them and the other prep centers apparently it was the majority of students. In fact, people who didn't prep had a slim chance of admission apparently. It seems like a way to keep out the poor and cater to the wealthy.

There were rumors that some students bought the test even.

There were rumors you dad molested you when you were a child even.