Hot off the presses - Arlington Parents for Education New Newsletter

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How many more threads and pages before Jeff gives APE its own forum?

Not soon enough. Buh byeeee

[Anonymous]

The new newsletter is up. Accountability on whether ARP funds were actually used to address learning loss, advocating for less screen time for elementary students, and promoting an upcoming Arlington Special Education Advisory Committee. The horror!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The new newsletter is up. Accountability on whether ARP funds were actually used to address learning loss, advocating for less screen time for elementary students, and promoting an upcoming Arlington Special Education Advisory Committee. The horror!

Maybe they reeled it in after two big fails in a row.

Or I bet they are saving up for a doozy soon. Scoreboard should be fun.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The new newsletter is up. Accountability on whether ARP funds were actually used to address learning loss, advocating for less screen time for elementary students, and promoting an upcoming Arlington Special Education Advisory Committee. The horror!

Maybe they reeled it in after two big fails in a row.

Or I bet they are saving up for a doozy soon. Scoreboard should be fun.

So you admit this newsletter is unobjectionable?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The new newsletter is up. Accountability on whether ARP funds were actually used to address learning loss, advocating for less screen time for elementary students, and promoting an upcoming Arlington Special Education Advisory Committee. The horror!

Maybe they reeled it in after two big fails in a row.

Or I bet they are saving up for a doozy soon. Scoreboard should be fun.

So you admit this newsletter is unobjectionable?

Yes. Maybe if they focus on topics like these they could make up for all of the harm they’ve done in the past. We shall see how it goes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The new newsletter is up. Accountability on whether ARP funds were actually used to address learning loss, advocating for less screen time for elementary students, and promoting an upcoming Arlington Special Education Advisory Committee. The horror!

Maybe they reeled it in after two big fails in a row.

Or I bet they are saving up for a doozy soon. Scoreboard should be fun.

So you admit this newsletter is unobjectionable?

Yes. Maybe if they focus on topics like these they could make up for all of the harm they’ve done in the past. We shall see how it goes.

Hi “Sally” - can you pls go back to trolling AEM 😊😊😊

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The new newsletter is up. Accountability on whether ARP funds were actually used to address learning loss, advocating for less screen time for elementary students, and promoting an upcoming Arlington Special Education Advisory Committee. The horror!

Maybe they reeled it in after two big fails in a row.

Or I bet they are saving up for a doozy soon. Scoreboard should be fun.

So you admit this newsletter is unobjectionable?

Yes. Maybe if they focus on topics like these they could make up for all of the harm they’ve done in the past. We shall see how it goes.

Hi “Sally” - can you pls go back to trolling AEM 😊😊😊

Did anyone ever figure out exactly who the fake Sally is? What a coward, to not use her real name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The new newsletter is up. Accountability on whether ARP funds were actually used to address learning loss, advocating for less screen time for elementary students, and promoting an upcoming Arlington Special Education Advisory Committee. The horror!

Maybe they reeled it in after two big fails in a row.

Or I bet they are saving up for a doozy soon. Scoreboard should be fun.

So you admit this newsletter is unobjectionable?

Unobjectionable and uninteresting. Really, there's an ASEAC meeting coming up? We need a newletter for this? This group has no purpose now and is floundering. Are we really lauding them for being unobjectionable? Is that our standard now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The new newsletter is up. Accountability on whether ARP funds were actually used to address learning loss, advocating for less screen time for elementary students, and promoting an upcoming Arlington Special Education Advisory Committee. The horror!

Maybe they reeled it in after two big fails in a row.

Or I bet they are saving up for a doozy soon. Scoreboard should be fun.

So you admit this newsletter is unobjectionable?

Yes. Maybe if they focus on topics like these they could make up for all of the harm they’ve done in the past. We shall see how it goes.

Hi “Sally” - can you pls go back to trolling AEM 😊😊😊

OK "Miranda". Good luck stumping for Youngkin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The new newsletter is up. Accountability on whether ARP funds were actually used to address learning loss, advocating for less screen time for elementary students, and promoting an upcoming Arlington Special Education Advisory Committee. The horror!

Maybe they reeled it in after two big fails in a row.

Or I bet they are saving up for a doozy soon. Scoreboard should be fun.

So you admit this newsletter is unobjectionable?

Unobjectionable and uninteresting. Really, there's an ASEAC meeting coming up? We need a newletter for this? This group has no purpose now and is floundering. Are we really lauding them for being unobjectionable? Is that our standard now?

I suspect their "purpose" and true intentions behind re-forming as a lobbying group will be revealed with their "scoreboard".

Can't wait for that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The new newsletter is up. Accountability on whether ARP funds were actually used to address learning loss, advocating for less screen time for elementary students, and promoting an upcoming Arlington Special Education Advisory Committee. The horror!

Maybe they reeled it in after two big fails in a row.

Or I bet they are saving up for a doozy soon. Scoreboard should be fun.

So you admit this newsletter is unobjectionable?

Unobjectionable and uninteresting. Really, there's an ASEAC meeting coming up? We need a newletter for this? This group has no purpose now and is floundering. Are we really lauding them for being unobjectionable? Is that our standard now?

I suspect their "purpose" and true intentions behind re-forming as a lobbying group will be revealed with their "scoreboard".

Can't wait for that.

They're trying to look middle of the road with a few less objectionable topics. Don't be fooled.