Hans Riemer's Wife Works For Pfizer and they have more than $50,000 in stock

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's talk about why Riemer wanted to give $500,000 to some big pharma connected "Pandemic Center?" Could that be connected to his wife too?
https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-beat/coronavirus/nonprofit-eyes-montgomery-county-for-global-pandemic-prevention-center/

I don't think you get it. Riemer is rich. He grew up rich. This not about making himself richer. He doesn't need that.

This is about him believing that he's above the rules that apply to everyone else. He should not be promoting appropriation of county funds in any way that could be perceived to financially benefit his family, no matter how small. Those are the rules.

He just doesn't believe those rules should apply to him.

Let's talk about why MCGEO picked THIS fight to have with Riemer, and why MCGEO apparently opposes a requirement for county employees to be vaccinated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's talk about why Riemer wanted to give $500,000 to some big pharma connected "Pandemic Center?" Could that be connected to his wife too?
https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-beat/coronavirus/nonprofit-eyes-montgomery-county-for-global-pandemic-prevention-center/

I don't think you get it. Riemer is rich. He grew up rich. This not about making himself richer. He doesn't need that.

This is about him believing that he's above the rules that apply to everyone else. He should not be promoting appropriation of county funds in any way that could be perceived to financially benefit his family, no matter how small. Those are the rules.

He just doesn't believe those rules should apply to him.

Let's talk about why MCGEO picked THIS fight to have with Riemer, and why MCGEO apparently opposes a requirement for county employees to be vaccinated.

LOL.

This is classic Riemer. Turning potentially winning positions into personal embarrassment because he just doesn't care about details and execution and refuses to be measured by outcomes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's talk about why Riemer wanted to give $500,000 to some big pharma connected "Pandemic Center?" Could that be connected to his wife too?
https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-beat/coronavirus/nonprofit-eyes-montgomery-county-for-global-pandemic-prevention-center/

I don't think you get it. Riemer is rich. He grew up rich. This not about making himself richer. He doesn't need that.

This is about him believing that he's above the rules that apply to everyone else. He should not be promoting appropriation of county funds in any way that could be perceived to financially benefit his family, no matter how small. Those are the rules.

He just doesn't believe those rules should apply to him.

Let's talk about why MCGEO picked THIS fight to have with Riemer, and why MCGEO apparently opposes a requirement for county employees to be vaccinated.

LOL.

This is classic Riemer. Turning potentially winning positions into personal embarrassment because he just doesn't care about details and execution and refuses to be measured by outcomes.

I don't disagree. Now let's talk about why MCGEO apparently opposes a requirement for county employees to be vaccinated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's talk about why Riemer wanted to give $500,000 to some big pharma connected "Pandemic Center?" Could that be connected to his wife too?
https://bethesdamagazine.com/bethesda-beat/coronavirus/nonprofit-eyes-montgomery-county-for-global-pandemic-prevention-center/

I don't think you get it. Riemer is rich. He grew up rich. This not about making himself richer. He doesn't need that.

This is about him believing that he's above the rules that apply to everyone else. He should not be promoting appropriation of county funds in any way that could be perceived to financially benefit his family, no matter how small. Those are the rules.

He just doesn't believe those rules should apply to him.

Let's talk about why MCGEO picked THIS fight to have with Riemer, and why MCGEO apparently opposes a requirement for county employees to be vaccinated.

LOL.

This is classic Riemer. Turning potentially winning positions into personal embarrassment because he just doesn't care about details and execution and refuses to be measured by outcomes.

I don't disagree. Now let's talk about why MCGEO apparently opposes a requirement for county employees to be vaccinated.

No thanks. I just don't care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
LOL.

This is classic Riemer. Turning potentially winning positions into personal embarrassment because he just doesn't care about details and execution and refuses to be measured by outcomes.

I don't disagree. Now let's talk about why MCGEO apparently opposes a requirement for county employees to be vaccinated.

No thanks. I just don't care.

That says a lot about your priorities.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
LOL.

This is classic Riemer. Turning potentially winning positions into personal embarrassment because he just doesn't care about details and execution and refuses to be measured by outcomes.

I don't disagree. Now let's talk about why MCGEO apparently opposes a requirement for county employees to be vaccinated.

No thanks. I just don't care.

That says a lot about your priorities.

You caught me! I plead guilty to not taking anything that Riemer says seriously because he doesn't take anything he says seriously.

[Anonymous]

Here's the advisory opinion from the Montgomery County Ethics Commission: https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/Ethics/Resources/Files/pdfs/A21-10-017%20FINAL.pdf

They decided that, because the county's policy does not affect Pfizer, Section 19A-11 of the County’s Public Ethics Law does not apply.

In my opinion, this is a common-sense decision.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Montgomery County council member Hans Riemer has sponsored a bill mandating that all county employees be vaccinated. This goes beyond the current, bargained agreement where employees must be vaccinated or get tested weekly.

https://apps.montgomerycountymd.gov/ccllims/BillDetailsPage?RecordId=2725

The unions are having a fit over this bill since it contravenes their bargained agreements with the county. So they are posting this now on twitter.

https://twitter.com/UFCW1994/status/1444407213624287234

https://www.mcgeo.org/email-archive/?email_id=252

How can he not disclose this?

Now talk about the revolving door between government health departments and pharmaceutical companies .