Hilaria Baldwin - At it again

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She hasn’t even thanked anyone for gestating her last child, has she? And she only kinda vaguely admitted to using a surrogate for that one, no? I kinda wonder if she only admitted to using a surrogate that time because she had to (i.e., it would have been physically impossible for her to have carried both of her last two kids).

I don't approve of any of Hilaria's behavior but she doesn't owe any thanks. The professional surrogate can tell herself whatever makes her feel better about herself but the woman rented out her womb for money. Her womb, her choice but once monetized, the surrogate became a seller. It was a business transaction and Hilaria paid very well for the gestation service so no public thanks are required.

No, I don't think Hilaria would have ever admitted to using a surrogate if she wasn't forced into it. It's obvious now that she's used surrogates before and yet, she is still trying to pretend that she hasn't.

My thoughts exactly. I find it problematic when people complain that she hired a POC as a surrogate, as though surrogacy is inherently exploitative. It may be, depending on the circumstances, but I wouldn't feel more comforted if Hilaria had hired white woman. In fact I would find it creepy if she only considered white candidates.

The issue isn't that she hired someone, or failed to thank them, or that they are a historically oppressed minority. The issue is that she represented herself as an aspirational fitness figure for postpartum women when she wasn't actually postpartum and her body was unrealistic for a woman who had just given birth. And by doing so, she set up unattainable beauty standards for vulnerable postpartum women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She hasn’t even thanked anyone for gestating her last child, has she? And she only kinda vaguely admitted to using a surrogate for that one, no? I kinda wonder if she only admitted to using a surrogate that time because she had to (i.e., it would have been physically impossible for her to have carried both of her last two kids).

I don't approve of any of Hilaria's behavior but she doesn't owe any thanks. The professional surrogate can tell herself whatever makes her feel better about herself but the woman rented out her womb for money. Her womb, her choice but once monetized, the surrogate became a seller. It was a business transaction and Hilaria paid very well for the gestation service so no public thanks are required.

No, I don't think Hilaria would have ever admitted to using a surrogate if she wasn't forced into it. It's obvious now that she's used surrogates before and yet, she is still trying to pretend that she hasn't.

My thoughts exactly. I find it problematic when people complain that she hired a POC as a surrogate, as though surrogacy is inherently exploitative. It may be, depending on the circumstances, but I wouldn't feel more comforted if Hilaria had hired white woman. In fact I would find it creepy if she only considered white candidates.

The issue isn't that she hired someone, or failed to thank them, or that they are a historically oppressed minority. The issue is that she represented herself as an aspirational fitness figure for postpartum women when she wasn't actually postpartum and her body was unrealistic for a woman who had just given birth. And by doing so, she set up unattainable beauty standards for vulnerable postpartum women.

But I thought she was considered ugly!! So what beauty standards??

A lot of women look good before, during and after pregnancy. A lot of women don’t look as good even when they have never been pregnant. Why is someone looking at her for standards? Why Are they looking at kardashians? If women are looking at celebs for standards then they are TSTL.
These are the women who leave their kids in hot cars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She hasn’t even thanked anyone for gestating her last child, has she? And she only kinda vaguely admitted to using a surrogate for that one, no? I kinda wonder if she only admitted to using a surrogate that time because she had to (i.e., it would have been physically impossible for her to have carried both of her last two kids).

I don't approve of any of Hilaria's behavior but she doesn't owe any thanks. The professional surrogate can tell herself whatever makes her feel better about herself but the woman rented out her womb for money. Her womb, her choice but once monetized, the surrogate became a seller. It was a business transaction and Hilaria paid very well for the gestation service so no public thanks are required.

No, I don't think Hilaria would have ever admitted to using a surrogate if she wasn't forced into it. It's obvious now that she's used surrogates before and yet, she is still trying to pretend that she hasn't.

My thoughts exactly. I find it problematic when people complain that she hired a POC as a surrogate, as though surrogacy is inherently exploitative. It may be, depending on the circumstances, but I wouldn't feel more comforted if Hilaria had hired white woman. In fact I would find it creepy if she only considered white candidates.

The issue isn't that she hired someone, or failed to thank them, or that they are a historically oppressed minority. The issue is that she represented herself as an aspirational fitness figure for postpartum women when she wasn't actually postpartum and her body was unrealistic for a woman who had just given birth. And by doing so, she set up unattainable beauty standards for vulnerable postpartum women.

I never thought of it this way (as bolder above), but as I read it I see how crystal clear and true this is. You are so right. There is no way that hilaria would have admitted to using a surrogate. In fact she is not even clear nor direct about the fact that her most recent baby is from a surrogate. Eek, no proof here of course, but it just feels true that she has probs used a surrogate before. Wow. If this is true then she is truly yikes and in a danger level of unwell in regards to her inability to be truthful.

She really does deserve all the negative attention she has coming at her. And no, it’s not coming at her because people are jealous or just out to get her. It’s because I think she just might really be still lying in pretty egregious ways to the entire public. Yikes

[Anonymous]

This goes well beyond the Spanish grift. I think the Spanish grift might actually be a symptom of a much deeper problem within this very troubled individual.

[Anonymous]

People who have actually gone through infertility struggles, or have any sensitivity or compassion to an audience of mothers who likely a % of which have had or do struggle with infertility, would never in their right mind post a story with a baby captioned “I need at least 2 more”.

Just another example of how her claim to have struggled with infertility was a ruse for attention at the cost of those who actually struggle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She hasn’t even thanked anyone for gestating her last child, has she? And she only kinda vaguely admitted to using a surrogate for that one, no? I kinda wonder if she only admitted to using a surrogate that time because she had to (i.e., it would have been physically impossible for her to have carried both of her last two kids).

I don't approve of any of Hilaria's behavior but she doesn't owe any thanks. The professional surrogate can tell herself whatever makes her feel better about herself but the woman rented out her womb for money. Her womb, her choice but once monetized, the surrogate became a seller. It was a business transaction and Hilaria paid very well for the gestation service so no public thanks are required.

No, I don't think Hilaria would have ever admitted to using a surrogate if she wasn't forced into it. It's obvious now that she's used surrogates before and yet, she is still trying to pretend that she hasn't.

My thoughts exactly. I find it problematic when people complain that she hired a POC as a surrogate, as though surrogacy is inherently exploitative. It may be, depending on the circumstances, but I wouldn't feel more comforted if Hilaria had hired white woman. In fact I would find it creepy if she only considered white candidates.

The issue isn't that she hired someone, or failed to thank them, or that they are a historically oppressed minority. The issue is that she represented herself as an aspirational fitness figure for postpartum women when she wasn't actually postpartum and her body was unrealistic for a woman who had just given birth. And by doing so, she set up unattainable beauty standards for vulnerable postpartum women.

But I thought she was considered ugly!! So what beauty standards??

A lot of women look good before, during and after pregnancy. A lot of women don’t look as good even when they have never been pregnant. Why is someone looking at her for standards? Why Are they looking at kardashians? If women are looking at celebs for standards then they are TSTL.
These are the women who leave their kids in hot cars.

Nowhere in my post did I say that Hilaria is considered ugly. On the contrary, I said her allegedly postpartum body is unrealistic. And I'm also not saying that postpartum bodies don't look good-- I think they are beautiful. But women undergo certain physiological changes during pregnancy that take some time to go back go normal.

As far as the women who look at her as an aspirational figure, I'm not sure how this relates to children in hot cars. But there is a large body of research on the effects of media on how people perceive themselves. So it isn't just vapid, stupid people who are affected by media images- in fact, it's a normal response.

[Anonymous]

She’s insignificant in the big picture. This isn’t entertaining.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
The issue is that she represented herself as an aspirational fitness figure for postpartum women when she wasn't actually postpartum and her body was unrealistic for a woman who had just given birth. And by doing so, she set up unattainable beauty standards for vulnerable postpartum women.

Exactly!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s insignificant in the big picture. This isn’t entertaining.

Oh STFU. It’s the goddamn entertainment forum. We will not be shamed by you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s insignificant in the big picture. This isn’t entertaining.

Oh STFU. It’s the goddamn entertainment forum. We will not be shamed by you.

You have a strange definition of shaming. And she’s not an entertainer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s insignificant in the big picture. This isn’t entertaining.

Oh STFU. It’s the goddamn entertainment forum. We will not be shamed by you.

You have a strange definition of shaming. And she’s not an entertainer.

What is she?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s insignificant in the big picture. This isn’t entertaining.

Oh STFU. It’s the goddamn entertainment forum. We will not be shamed by you.

You have a strange definition of shaming. And she’s not an entertainer.

Lol. What does she try to make money for doing if it’s not entertainment?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s insignificant in the big picture. This isn’t entertaining.

Oh STFU. It’s the goddamn entertainment forum. We will not be shamed by you.

You have a strange definition of shaming. And she’s not an entertainer.

What is she?

I don’t think she really has a job at this point. She’s some famous dude’s wife at this point. She’s faded into that. Most of us would legit have no idea who this person was if not for recent topics button.

[Anonymous]

She is a self described wellness expert who in actuality is pretty much the exact opposite.

Another sicko moment today in her stories is when she is cradling her babies head in her lap and then literally shoves her head into her own chest and claims that the baby is lunging for food.

This is legit impossible for a 4 month old to do. Babies cannot sit up on their own. It’s another play for breast attention. I have a hard time believing this woman has a single genuine female friend. Her behavior is revolting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She hasn’t even thanked anyone for gestating her last child, has she? And she only kinda vaguely admitted to using a surrogate for that one, no? I kinda wonder if she only admitted to using a surrogate that time because she had to (i.e., it would have been physically impossible for her to have carried both of her last two kids).

I don't approve of any of Hilaria's behavior but she doesn't owe any thanks. The professional surrogate can tell herself whatever makes her feel better about herself but the woman rented out her womb for money. Her womb, her choice but once monetized, the surrogate became a seller. It was a business transaction and Hilaria paid very well for the gestation service so no public thanks are required.

No, I don't think Hilaria would have ever admitted to using a surrogate if she wasn't forced into it. It's obvious now that she's used surrogates before and yet, she is still trying to pretend that she hasn't.

My thoughts exactly. I find it problematic when people complain that she hired a POC as a surrogate, as though surrogacy is inherently exploitative. It may be, depending on the circumstances, but I wouldn't feel more comforted if Hilaria had hired white woman. In fact I would find it creepy if she only considered white candidates.

The issue isn't that she hired someone, or failed to thank them, or that they are a historically oppressed minority. The issue is that she represented herself as an aspirational fitness figure for postpartum women when she wasn't actually postpartum and her body was unrealistic for a woman who had just given birth. And by doing so, she set up unattainable beauty standards for vulnerable postpartum women.

I never thought of it this way (as bolder above), but as I read it I see how crystal clear and true this is. You are so right. There is no way that hilaria would have admitted to using a surrogate. In fact she is not even clear nor direct about the fact that her most recent baby is from a surrogate. Eek, no proof here of course, but it just feels true that she has probs used a surrogate before. Wow. If this is true then she is truly yikes and in a danger level of unwell in regards to her inability to be truthful.

She really does deserve all the negative attention she has coming at her. And no, it’s not coming at her because people are jealous or just out to get her. It’s because I think she just might really be still lying in pretty egregious ways to the entire public. Yikes

When you look at it from this perspective the whole recent thing of her not coming up yes with the right "story" to explain the little baby girl's arrival makes so more sense.

She can't figure out how to explain it, and has never directly acknowledged using a surrogate (it's always been through "inside sources" and weird allusions), because acknowledging a surrogate would bring on so many more questions. If the girl was born in February, then the surrogate got pregnant, what, May or June? IN THE MIDDLE OF A GLOBAL PANDEMIC????? How did they arrange that? When did she do an egg transfer if she was pregnant with the boy? How were they able to do all the contracts etc so quickly after finding out he was a boy, to be able to order up a girl?

So many questions!!!!