A thread of optimism: why do you think Trump will win in 2020?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.

+1

Media is doing its job.

Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.

What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.

Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.

There were no race riots

Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....

Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.

Liberal troll, trolling again. Yawn.
-DP

Don’t you know who is paying for your propaganda?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump may not be liked by a lot of people (including me), but he definitely achieved something that most seasoned politicians with more money could not achieve. He also changed the rules of the game. And most of the Democratic candidates (as of today) are clueless about new rules. It is pathetic to see Biden's campaign geared by old rules. He has no idea and totally cannot even comprehend how he should play.

Biden was a Senator for 36 years and VP for 8 years.

He IS the "swamp"!

How in the heck could the Democratic Party make him the front runner? He's the problem, not the solution.

A constant liar, fraud, career con man and Russian puppet is the SWAMP. He pays no taxes, he praises and believes his master Putin over American agencies, just enacts extensive reality TV drama on immigration with support from the Australian channel.

The conman Trump with a avg approval below 43% and behind Biden in TX isn’t in good shape. Don’t say you don’t believe in polls because In over 30 years TX was never competitive for dems and NO dem candidate ever led in TX. Ignore the warning at your own peril.

Very well said. Idiots won’t listen though. F them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump may not be liked by a lot of people (including me), but he definitely achieved something that most seasoned politicians with more money could not achieve. He also changed the rules of the game. And most of the Democratic candidates (as of today) are clueless about new rules. It is pathetic to see Biden's campaign geared by old rules. He has no idea and totally cannot even comprehend how he should play.

Biden was a Senator for 36 years and VP for 8 years.

He IS the "swamp"!

How in the heck could the Democratic Party make him the front runner? He's the problem, not the solution.

A constant liar, fraud, career con man and Russian puppet is the SWAMP. He pays no taxes, he praises and believes his master Putin over American agencies, just enacts extensive reality TV drama on immigration with support from the Australian channel.

The conman Trump with a avg approval below 43% and behind Biden in TX isn’t in good shape. Don’t say you don’t believe in polls because In over 30 years TX was never competitive for dems and NO dem candidate ever led in TX. Ignore the warning at your own peril.

Very well said. Idiots won’t listen though. F them.

I forgot his other catchphrases: "constant liar, fraud, career conman, master Putin."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.

+1

Media is doing its job.

Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.

What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.

Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.

There were no race riots

Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....

Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.

You are certifiably crazy if you can't acknowledge even widely reported, obvious facts.

Stop watching whatever it is you are watching -- just my friendly advice.

Where are the obvious facts that aren't being acknowledged? Certainly not here.

You must be Russian if you don't know about the dozen BLM riots that took place here from 2014 to 2016.

You certainly didn't read any US newspaper or watched any US TV channel.

You must be a racist if you think Obama “provoked” the demonstrations.

YOU are the racist.

Compare how Macron is dealing with the yellow vest protests/ riots in France and how Obama dealt with blm protests/ riots here.

One worked hard to contain them and to channel them and to stop the inadmissible violence. The other justified them and promoted them and attacked the police.

How am I racist? Please explain.

Sure.

When someone criticizes the behavior of a President, instead of discussing the specific behavior you say the poster "must be a racist."

You seem to believe people must treat people differently based on their skin color -- ie, you are a textbook racist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.

+1

Media is doing its job.

Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.

What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.

Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.

There were no race riots

Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....

Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.

You are certifiably crazy if you can't acknowledge even widely reported, obvious facts.

Stop watching whatever it is you are watching -- just my friendly advice.

And you are trusting Foreigners over Americans. The hate crimes have increased under the supremacist supporting Russian puppet.

https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/11/14/opinions/fbi-hate-crimes-data-whats-missing-berry-wiggins/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F

+1

Hate begets hate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.

+1

Media is doing its job.

Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.

What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.

Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.

There were no race riots

Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....

Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.

Liberal troll, trolling again. Yawn.
-DP

Russian traitor defending the liar, Russian puppet. It is so sad I can’t ignore with a yawn.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump may not be liked by a lot of people (including me), but he definitely achieved something that most seasoned politicians with more money could not achieve. He also changed the rules of the game. And most of the Democratic candidates (as of today) are clueless about new rules. It is pathetic to see Biden's campaign geared by old rules. He has no idea and totally cannot even comprehend how he should play.

Biden was a Senator for 36 years and VP for 8 years.

He IS the "swamp"!

How in the heck could the Democratic Party make him the front runner? He's the problem, not the solution.

A constant liar, fraud, career con man and Russian puppet is the SWAMP. He pays no taxes, he praises and believes his master Putin over American agencies, just enacts extensive reality TV drama on immigration with support from the Australian channel.

The conman Trump with a avg approval below 43% and behind Biden in TX isn’t in good shape. Don’t say you don’t believe in polls because In over 30 years TX was never competitive for dems and NO dem candidate ever led in TX. Ignore the warning at your own peril.

Very well said. Idiots won’t listen though. F them.

F the Russian traitors and whores selling their soul to the Russia traitor just because he harasses the brown refugees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump may not be liked by a lot of people (including me), but he definitely achieved something that most seasoned politicians with more money could not achieve. He also changed the rules of the game. And most of the Democratic candidates (as of today) are clueless about new rules. It is pathetic to see Biden's campaign geared by old rules. He has no idea and totally cannot even comprehend how he should play.

Biden was a Senator for 36 years and VP for 8 years.

He IS the "swamp"!

How in the heck could the Democratic Party make him the front runner? He's the problem, not the solution.

A constant liar, fraud, career con man and Russian puppet is the SWAMP. He pays no taxes, he praises and believes his master Putin over American agencies, just enacts extensive reality TV drama on immigration with support from the Australian channel.

The conman Trump with a avg approval below 43% and behind Biden in TX isn’t in good shape. Don’t say you don’t believe in polls because In over 30 years TX was never competitive for dems and NO dem candidate ever led in TX. Ignore the warning at your own peril.

Very well said. Idiots won’t listen though. F them.

I forgot his other catchphrases: "constant liar, fraud, career conman, master Putin."

Says the puff cakes who can’t handle anti PC post and say it like it is. It is the lazy twitter troll who introduced the name calling. Go tell him to do some work instead of the FT job of Twitter trolling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.

+1

Media is doing its job.

Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.

What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.

Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.

There were no race riots

Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....

Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.

You are certifiably crazy if you can't acknowledge even widely reported, obvious facts.

Stop watching whatever it is you are watching -- just my friendly advice.

Where are the obvious facts that aren't being acknowledged? Certainly not here.

You must be Russian if you don't know about the dozen BLM riots that took place here from 2014 to 2016.

You certainly didn't read any US newspaper or watched any US TV channel.

You must be a racist if you think Obama “provoked” the demonstrations.

YOU are the racist.

Compare how Macron is dealing with the yellow vest protests/ riots in France and how Obama dealt with blm protests/ riots here.

One worked hard to contain them and to channel them and to stop the inadmissible violence. The other justified them and promoted them and attacked the police.

How am I racist? Please explain.

Sure.

When someone criticizes the behavior of a President, instead of discussing the specific behavior you say the poster "must be a racist."

You seem to believe people must treat people differently based on their skin color -- ie, you are a textbook racist.

You wouldn’t be criticizing him in the same way if he were white. Racist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.

+1

Media is doing its job.

Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.

What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.

Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.

There were no race riots

Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....

Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.

You are certifiably crazy if you can't acknowledge even widely reported, obvious facts.

Stop watching whatever it is you are watching -- just my friendly advice.

Where are the obvious facts that aren't being acknowledged? Certainly not here.

You must be Russian if you don't know about the dozen BLM riots that took place here from 2014 to 2016.

You certainly didn't read any US newspaper or watched any US TV channel.

You must be a racist if you think Obama “provoked” the demonstrations.

YOU are the racist.

Compare how Macron is dealing with the yellow vest protests/ riots in France and how Obama dealt with blm protests/ riots here.

One worked hard to contain them and to channel them and to stop the inadmissible violence. The other justified them and promoted them and attacked the police.

How am I racist? Please explain.

Sure.

When someone criticizes the behavior of a President, instead of discussing the specific behavior you say the poster "must be a racist."

You seem to believe people must treat people differently based on their skin color -- ie, you are a textbook racist.

You wouldn’t be criticizing him in the same way if he were white. Racist.

BS.

I would say the same precise thing, racist.

For example, I can say that GW's invasion of Irak was horrible and disgusting and based on a fat lie.

See, racist?

I can also say that, while I appreciate many thing Bill Clinton did, his personal behavior in office was probably the worst of any President in many many decades.

See, racist?

[Anonymous]

NOT PP.

But Bill Clinton was president over 20 years. We have a new Russian puppet and a proud self declared pussy grabber, liar whose personal behaviors is the worst and is going down as the worst president of the country’s history.

Calling the twitter troll president and white supremacist sympathizer as a racist doesn’t make anyone a racist. Calling a spade a spade doesn’t make the truth teller a racist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because the media is too obvious about their extreme bias. I read article after article bashing trump. I’m beginning to get suspicious. These are the same people who have claimed numerous times that Trump would wreck the economy. They claimed Hilary would win in a landslide. I’m a liberal and I’m starting to get annoyed with the liberal coverage. The weekly NYT article about the economy going south. I can’t help but recognize he’s gotten some things done.

+1

Media is doing its job.

Remember how they covered Bill Clinton? It was endlessly negative.

What I remember is eight years of obscene adulation of the Obamas, even when Barack deported millions of immigrants and provoked riot after riot.

Obama and his cronies certainly did provoke endless race riots.

There were no race riots

Oh yeah, there were at least a dozen violent blm riots, leading to hundreds more murders in Baltimore, Ferguson, Detroit....

Stop watching the Australian channel making the Australian a billionaire while you suffer for irreversible brain damage. The Australian, Russian and the traitor are together taking the rubes for a long ride.

You are certifiably crazy if you can't acknowledge even widely reported, obvious facts.

Stop watching whatever it is you are watching -- just my friendly advice.

Where are the obvious facts that aren't being acknowledged? Certainly not here.

You must be Russian if you don't know about the dozen BLM riots that took place here from 2014 to 2016.

You certainly didn't read any US newspaper or watched any US TV channel.

You must be a racist if you think Obama “provoked” the demonstrations.

YOU are the racist.

Compare how Macron is dealing with the yellow vest protests/ riots in France and how Obama dealt with blm protests/ riots here.

One worked hard to contain them and to channel them and to stop the inadmissible violence. The other justified them and promoted them and attacked the police.

How am I racist? Please explain.

Sure.

When someone criticizes the behavior of a President, instead of discussing the specific behavior you say the poster "must be a racist."

You seem to believe people must treat people differently based on their skin color -- ie, you are a textbook racist.

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump may not be liked by a lot of people (including me), but he definitely achieved something that most seasoned politicians with more money could not achieve. He also changed the rules of the game. And most of the Democratic candidates (as of today) are clueless about new rules. It is pathetic to see Biden's campaign geared by old rules. He has no idea and totally cannot even comprehend how he should play.

Biden was a Senator for 36 years and VP for 8 years.

He IS the "swamp"!

How in the heck could the Democratic Party make him the front runner? He's the problem, not the solution.

A constant liar, fraud, career con man and Russian puppet is the SWAMP. He pays no taxes, he praises and believes his master Putin over American agencies, just enacts extensive reality TV drama on immigration with support from the Australian channel.

The conman Trump with a avg approval below 43% and behind Biden in TX isn’t in good shape. Don’t say you don’t believe in polls because In over 30 years TX was never competitive for dems and NO dem candidate ever led in TX. Ignore the warning at your own peril.

Very well said. Idiots won’t listen though. F them.

F the Russian traitors and whores selling their soul to the Russia traitor just because he harasses the brown refugees.

Seriously? Liberals, you own this guy ^^^. Hope you’re proud of the way he’s reflecting all of you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump may not be liked by a lot of people (including me), but he definitely achieved something that most seasoned politicians with more money could not achieve. He also changed the rules of the game. And most of the Democratic candidates (as of today) are clueless about new rules. It is pathetic to see Biden's campaign geared by old rules. He has no idea and totally cannot even comprehend how he should play.

Biden was a Senator for 36 years and VP for 8 years.

He IS the "swamp"!

How in the heck could the Democratic Party make him the front runner? He's the problem, not the solution.

A constant liar, fraud, career con man and Russian puppet is the SWAMP. He pays no taxes, he praises and believes his master Putin over American agencies, just enacts extensive reality TV drama on immigration with support from the Australian channel.

The conman Trump with a avg approval below 43% and behind Biden in TX isn’t in good shape. Don’t say you don’t believe in polls because In over 30 years TX was never competitive for dems and NO dem candidate ever led in TX. Ignore the warning at your own peril.

Very well said. Idiots won’t listen though. F them.

I forgot his other catchphrases: "constant liar, fraud, career conman, master Putin."

Says the puff cakes who can’t handle anti PC post and say it like it is. It is the lazy twitter troll who introduced the name calling. Go tell him to do some work instead of the FT job of Twitter trolling.

Why can’t you write correctly?

[Anonymous]

Trump will win because of the Kardashian’s. The same people who support the Kardashian’s support the Donald.