GFR Falling apart?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So KG resigned effective immediately?? She was the only thing holding this club together.

Wow. Agree, she was relied on to do, uh, basically everything!

which is probably why she resigned. she did more work than the TD for sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So KG resigned effective immediately?? She was the only thing holding this club together.

That’s a hit to GFR. Big loss.

[Anonymous]

Isn’t there a new board seat up for grabs too? Does existing board already have someone they want to fill it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP, but I also do not see the huge value of being in an alliance. At best 2 or 3 players at the U13 level would potentially leave GFR to follow an alliance 'pathway' After that age it would be harder to follow because existing players typically get the edge at ID sessions. If those players are really that talented they are probably going to be club hopping every year or so anyway to find their best fit. Definitely no reason for a whole team to leave a club because of lack of a perceived pathway Most were never going to benefit from the alliance anyway

Clubs are rarely ‘standing still’. They are expanding and growing or contracting and shrinking. Having a pathway is probably less about the actual nuts and bolts of what it entails and more about being a club that leagues want, clubs want to partner with and players want to play for. 7-8 years ago, CYA had 3-5 teams across age groups and was a partner w/ VSA and PWSI in VDA. Now they have merged w/ a slightly smaller club in SYA, and the merged club is smaller than they were, and it doesn’t seem like it is getting better anytime soon.

CYA and SYA are now partnered with Valor for travel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t there a new board seat up for grabs too? Does existing board already have someone they want to fill it?

email said they are accepting nominations so my guess is no

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP, but I also do not see the huge value of being in an alliance. At best 2 or 3 players at the U13 level would potentially leave GFR to follow an alliance 'pathway' After that age it would be harder to follow because existing players typically get the edge at ID sessions. If those players are really that talented they are probably going to be club hopping every year or so anyway to find their best fit. Definitely no reason for a whole team to leave a club because of lack of a perceived pathway Most were never going to benefit from the alliance anyway

Clubs are rarely ‘standing still’. They are expanding and growing or contracting and shrinking. Having a pathway is probably less about the actual nuts and bolts of what it entails and more about being a club that leagues want, clubs want to partner with and players want to play for. 7-8 years ago, CYA had 3-5 teams across age groups and was a partner w/ VSA and PWSI in VDA. Now they have merged w/ a slightly smaller club in SYA, and the merged club is smaller than they were, and it doesn’t seem like it is getting better anytime soon.

CYA and SYA are now partnered with Valor for travel.

And Valor is in FVU.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t there a new board seat up for grabs too? Does existing board already have someone they want to fill it?

email said they are accepting nominations so my guess is no

true but they won’t vote in anyone that doesn’t plan to fall in line

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn’t there a new board seat up for grabs too? Does existing board already have someone they want to fill it?

email said they are accepting nominations so my guess is no

true but they won’t vote in anyone that doesn’t plan to fall in line

why would they? look what happened last time they let someone in they didn't know or trust.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP, but I also do not see the huge value of being in an alliance. At best 2 or 3 players at the U13 level would potentially leave GFR to follow an alliance 'pathway' After that age it would be harder to follow because existing players typically get the edge at ID sessions. If those players are really that talented they are probably going to be club hopping every year or so anyway to find their best fit. Definitely no reason for a whole team to leave a club because of lack of a perceived pathway Most were never going to benefit from the alliance anyway

Clubs are rarely ‘standing still’. They are expanding and growing or contracting and shrinking. Having a pathway is probably less about the actual nuts and bolts of what it entails and more about being a club that leagues want, clubs want to partner with and players want to play for. 7-8 years ago, CYA had 3-5 teams across age groups and was a partner w/ VSA and PWSI in VDA. Now they have merged w/ a slightly smaller club in SYA, and the merged club is smaller than they were, and it doesn’t seem like it is getting better anytime soon.

CYA and SYA are now partnered with Valor for travel.

CYA travel + SYA travel = Valor. It's a merger not a partnership. If anything you could say Valor is partnered with Herndon, VYS, BRYC, etc to feed into FVU (even though we all know that's not really how it works). I don't know whether VSA and PWSI are true feeders to VDA or if VDA just takes the best players who try out regardless of where they came from. I suspect the latter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP, but I also do not see the huge value of being in an alliance. At best 2 or 3 players at the U13 level would potentially leave GFR to follow an alliance 'pathway' After that age it would be harder to follow because existing players typically get the edge at ID sessions. If those players are really that talented they are probably going to be club hopping every year or so anyway to find their best fit. Definitely no reason for a whole team to leave a club because of lack of a perceived pathway Most were never going to benefit from the alliance anyway

Clubs are rarely ‘standing still’. They are expanding and growing or contracting and shrinking. Having a pathway is probably less about the actual nuts and bolts of what it entails and more about being a club that leagues want, clubs want to partner with and players want to play for. 7-8 years ago, CYA had 3-5 teams across age groups and was a partner w/ VSA and PWSI in VDA. Now they have merged w/ a slightly smaller club in SYA, and the merged club is smaller than they were, and it doesn’t seem like it is getting better anytime soon.

CYA and SYA are now partnered with Valor for travel.

CYA travel + SYA travel = Valor. It's a merger not a partnership. If anything you could say Valor is partnered with Herndon, VYS, BRYC, etc to feed into FVU (even though we all know that's not really how it works). I don't know whether VSA and PWSI are true feeders to VDA or if VDA just takes the best players who try out regardless of where they came from. I suspect the latter.

Right, and the point of bringing up CYA is that it is a quarter of what it once was, at the travel soccer level. GFR seems to be on the same glide path.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DP, but I also do not see the huge value of being in an alliance. At best 2 or 3 players at the U13 level would potentially leave GFR to follow an alliance 'pathway' After that age it would be harder to follow because existing players typically get the edge at ID sessions. If those players are really that talented they are probably going to be club hopping every year or so anyway to find their best fit. Definitely no reason for a whole team to leave a club because of lack of a perceived pathway Most were never going to benefit from the alliance anyway

Clubs are rarely ‘standing still’. They are expanding and growing or contracting and shrinking. Having a pathway is probably less about the actual nuts and bolts of what it entails and more about being a club that leagues want, clubs want to partner with and players want to play for. 7-8 years ago, CYA had 3-5 teams across age groups and was a partner w/ VSA and PWSI in VDA. Now they have merged w/ a slightly smaller club in SYA, and the merged club is smaller than they were, and it doesn’t seem like it is getting better anytime soon.

+1000

This is a really well thought out point! You articulated why it’s important for a club to seek meaningful partnerships and expand. I’ve been saying these decisions are going to lead the club to irrelevancy and perhaps nothing more than a rec club à la CYA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So KG resigned effective immediately?? She was the only thing holding this club together.

If that's true, GFR might as well shut down now. She was the glue that kept that whole thing running.

[Anonymous]

Was she the adkin

[Anonymous]

Yup. And really good at what she does.

[Anonymous]

Kind of weird to quit with no notice. Something must have happened.