Joe is out

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I would vote for ANYONE over Trump.

And I will enthusiastically go out to get votes for Harris.


Harris will always be herself - which is a bad temper, no manners, ill fitting pantsuits and faux pearls. The "face" she puts on for the public is who she is. She will never get the votes with it.


Clearly. That's why you and the trumpers are running around on social media rn like chickens with your head cut off.


Ooh, now tell us what Democrats are currently doing on social media.
DP
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Well, this totally steals Trump's thunder and will be the focus of the news until the DNC convention. Totally ruins their strategy to date. And now the Democratic nominee can distance themselves from whatever unpopular policies there have been under Joe.

um no, they have come out swinging tying Harris to Biden, especially regarding the border mess.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4784658-trump-campaign-attacks-harris/



The number of migrants unlawfully crossing the U.S. southern border has continued to drop markedly in July, nearing a threshold that would require officials to lift a partial ban on asylum claims enacted by President Biden, according to internal government data obtained by CBS News.

July is on track to see the fifth consecutive monthly drop in migrant apprehensions along the U.S.-Mexico border and the lowest level in illegal immigration there since the fall of 2020, during the Trump administration, the internal Department of Homeland Security figures show.

In early June, President Biden invoked a far-reaching presidential authority to suspend the entry of most migrants entering the U.S. illegally, effectively shutting off access to the American asylum system outside of official ports of entry.

Illegal border crossings — which were already falling before Mr. Biden's action — plunged further after the order took effect, reaching a three-year low in June.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/migrant-crossings-plunge-near-level-lift-biden-border-crackdown/

Try harder.

Why are you Dems so dumb.

I despise Trump to the last molecule of my being.

But, they've done a good job tying the border mess to Harris, and you cannot erase 3 years of the mess at the border in 3 months, especially when the MAGA camp will be pushing this message 24/7.

I think you Dems are stupid smart - there's a lot of educated brain power there, but you don't know how to read the room.


Ok, where do you stand on Trump tanking the bi-partisan border bill that was set to pass?
Anonymous
In recognition of the news, does anyone know if crowds are gathering near the White House or observatory this evening?
Anonymous
We'll see how our Republicans react
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Ossof and Mark Kelly also endorsed Kamala



But Obama and Michelle have not. That says it all. Obama wants an "open process".
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I would vote for ANYONE over Trump.

And I will enthusiastically go out to get votes for Harris.


Harris will always be herself - which is a bad temper, no manners, ill fitting pantsuits and faux pearls. The "face" she puts on for the public is who she is. She will never get the votes with it.


Clearly. That's why you and the trumpers are running around on social media rn like chickens with your head cut off.


Ooh, now tell us what Democrats are currently doing on social media.
DP


Super excited for Kamala, surprisingly
Anonymous
Hahahaha

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Well, this totally steals Trump's thunder and will be the focus of the news until the DNC convention. Totally ruins their strategy to date. And now the Democratic nominee can distance themselves from whatever unpopular policies there have been under Joe.

um no, they have come out swinging tying Harris to Biden, especially regarding the border mess.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4784658-trump-campaign-attacks-harris/



The number of migrants unlawfully crossing the U.S. southern border has continued to drop markedly in July, nearing a threshold that would require officials to lift a partial ban on asylum claims enacted by President Biden, according to internal government data obtained by CBS News.

July is on track to see the fifth consecutive monthly drop in migrant apprehensions along the U.S.-Mexico border and the lowest level in illegal immigration there since the fall of 2020, during the Trump administration, the internal Department of Homeland Security figures show.

In early June, President Biden invoked a far-reaching presidential authority to suspend the entry of most migrants entering the U.S. illegally, effectively shutting off access to the American asylum system outside of official ports of entry.

Illegal border crossings — which were already falling before Mr. Biden's action — plunged further after the order took effect, reaching a three-year low in June.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/migrant-crossings-plunge-near-level-lift-biden-border-crackdown/

Try harder.

Why are you Dems so dumb.

I despise Trump to the last molecule of my being.

But, they've done a good job tying the border mess to Harris, and you cannot erase 3 years of the mess at the border in 3 months, especially when the MAGA camp will be pushing this message 24/7.

I think you Dems are stupid smart - there's a lot of educated brain power there, but you don't know how to read the room.


Ok, where do you stand on Trump tanking the bi-partisan border bill that was set to pass?


EX.ACT.LY!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I will vote for Kamala (but find her voice to be a little grating). I wonder if she ever worked with a voice coach?


Gosh, it’s so hard to choose between an annoying voice and the end of democracy in the USA! This one’s a real head-scratcher
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Did you know Trump is the oldest candidate to run for POTUS?


This country can't survive another geriatric President. Trump can't hide in Biden's shadow anymore.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:DEI: A cudgel used by racists pretending every single person of color didn't earn what they have while ignoring the white 2.0 GPA "legacies" and those with daddies writing checks, who get into the Ivies or a business school where their brother knew someone.

I suspect those who bleat "DEI" also had no problem voting for a VP who needed five mediocre colleges and six years, just to get a communications degree.

Funny how you can be some GED felon and get votes from the same people who think Justice Jackson is a "DEI" hire. But sure, no racism involved in your thought-process while we see the buffoons who get elected on the right.


Defending DEI and blasting its critics mindlessly as “racist” is just not the centrist platform the Dems need right now to turn this election around.


It isn't about defending it, it's about pointing out the extremely low standards required of WHITE politicians on the right while in the same breathe as calling anyone non-white a "DEI" hire.

That you called it "mindless" when anyone with even two, functioning brain cells can see the racism from those who attack it, is your limitation.

The same people who think Boebert is qualified to be in Congress, think Jackson has no business being on the SC, despite the fact that she is more qualified than several of her white counterparts. Tough sh*t if you can handle the glaring hypocrisy from the right. We all see it. The Obamas had to be the "Huxtables" while Trump could get away with being Bill Cosby. Spare me your inability to see the cancer of racism being the entire reason someone as disgusting as Trump IS the Republican party. That stupid man wouldn't know the constitution if Madison used puppets to explain to him. The moment he used racism was the moment he galvanized the party. Mediocrity for one race, rules the GOP and has for a long time. It's why someone as unqualified as Dubya became president. It's why a moron like Palin got to be a nominee. The GOP has NO standards.


Boebert was voted into her current position. Harris couldn't even win a primary for President. How will they credibly argue she can win swing states?


I don't think Harris can win. I'm the one who said I dislike her. I simply don't like her, but that doesn't change the fact that the GOP is a f***ing joke when they talk about "DEI" when their party is full of people who are the reason dry cleaning bags read: "This is not a toy." Where in the hell does ANY Republican get the nerve to talk about "DEI" with the morons they elect and nominate? Dubya was a C/D student who got into two of the most prestigious universities in the world. Palin was an idiot.

The GOP doesn't get to mention "DEI" when they vote for ACTUAL affirmative action candidates.


29 year old Kamala did have an affair with a married man who helped her with her political career.


That should win over some Trump voters. Or does she not have enough affairs on her resume to impress the Republican base?


I think sleeping with a man who helps you succeed in your career is different than just having an affair. Would Kamala be where she is today if she hadn’t slept with a 60 year old married mayor? He appointed her to highly paid government positions and admitted her helped her with her career. So she slept with him to get jobs? Yes.


The GOP should 100% definitely slut shame the former AG of and Senator from California for the affair she had 30 years ago. Make sure you emphasize that no woman can ever transgress against the retrograde double standard if she ever wants to accomplish anything in her life but that men have free rein to do so.


By all means talk about it! We’ll keep talking about Trump sleeping with a porn star while his wife was pregnant. Also, let’s talk about all of the creepiness of him leering at undressed teenaged pageant contestants. Two grown adults having an affair is just not the same.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I am excited and I am an independent! We finally have a candidate who can feel good about voting for! Not only will I vote for her, I’m volunteering for her campaign!!!! She is a breath of fresh air!


Sorry, but I cannot take her seriously.

Dems need someone with executive experience. Newsome, Whitmer, perhaps Hokle.

Attorney Generals and Vice Presidents have executive experience, dear. And anyone who likes Hochul isn’t paying attention.

Wait so did Kamala mess up the border situation or does she have no executive experience? It can't be both. I'm shocked that people here think the VP just twiddles their thumb for four years.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I will vote for Kamala (but find her voice to be a little grating). I wonder if she ever worked with a voice coach?


Gosh, it’s so hard to choose between an annoying voice and the end of democracy in the USA! This one’s a real head-scratcher


Obama smoked cigarettes to give himself a Presidential voice. Appearance matters, whether you want it to or not.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Kamala Harris was complicit in a massive coverup to hide and deny the fact that Joe Biden was not capable of discharging the duties of the office.

She also was the the border czar during the worst border crisis in American history.

Democrats are just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.


Mmm hmmm. Just keep going with that and Dems will keep playing the battery shark quote.


This election is going to be a breeze for Trump if this is truly how the left thinks. Good Lord.


Ditto is this is what the right thinks. You may rile the base up more with this coverup garbage, but if there is anything that's DC inside baseball, it would be that.
Anonymous
Only one of these people might work for another country.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: