HAHAHAHAHA. It’s almost secured, right, PP? Any day now…oops, I mean next week…oops, I mean the week after that, but it’s TOTALLY coming.
|
So sorry to hear of your experience. Unfortunately, that seems to be the experience of pretty much everyone caught up in CW's schemes except for the early ones who can maybe get some $$ out the door before everything comes crashing down. |
| Any updates? |
| How are the Whittle kids settling in, wherever they landed? Hope all are well. Would love to hear some first person accounts. |
| We got out mid spring semester. Kids are doing very well adjusting to new schools. I won’t say where but they are at a well known boys school. They love it. |
| Did anyone end up at Maret, as alleged in earlier posts? |
| Of course not. Not a single one. |
If you know this for a fact I’m assuming you’re a Maret admin |
I’m a parent. What absolute tosh Of course there are kids at Maret. Ditto the Bisgaards |
| Bisgaards can't believe their luck! So far, no suits. Hide out for a year while the dust settles. |
Good for you guys. I hope everyone has similar outcomes. |
The vast majority of people who publicly talk about suing someone never do it, just huffing and puffing. Real costs are involved with real risk analysis about winning and recovering those costs plus something more. |
|
Hehehe. The parents committee wishes. Patently untrue. Let’s give it 18 months, shall we and talk then when the suits are filed (mostly on contingency)?
Consumer protection alone is a 2 year window to file and 3x the damages, at least. And don’t say there are no damages. Plenty probable damages, maybe next time don’t lie to the parents, eh? Hope the book that I hear is in the works comes out about the same time. |
|
I don't doubt that there may be some grounds here, but given the late stage of parent committee involvement, I am not appreciating the extent of the damages.
And given what evidence might be required to prove a consumer protection claim (educational experts for at least LS, MS, and HS), would there be any award left over after attorney's fees are accounted for? Just curious. |
|
Perkins Eastman Architects, DPC vs. Whittle, Christopher
New York Supreme Court Last week architects involved in the Chinese schools among others, filed against Chris Whittle personally for a whopping $3.8M --seems only $200k of their promissory note was paid back--- in 2017. According to CEO Magazine Whittle had worked with them for 15 years...so who knows what this money was meant for, given Whittle's proclivity for grabbing yesterday's cash flow to fund today's debacle. |