The Cambridges News and Updates ( Prince William, Kate Middleton, George, Charlotte and Louis)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What news are there of these royal? I don't see any news of them at all.
My DH and DD in a locked up Canada are doing more things than these two!

The funny thing is -- they're as active as they ever were pre-Covid (which means negligible) but no one cares. I personally think that's because all of their work is disjointed. They don't know how to connect their campaigns or initiatives to each other or themselves.

[Anonymous]

William and Kate are discreetly trying to distance themselves from the Kensington brand. This week they changed their Instagram handle from KensingtonRoyal to DukeandduchessofCambridge.

This scandal is going to be really, really bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:William and Kate are discreetly trying to distance themselves from the Kensington brand. This week they changed their Instagram handle from KensingtonRoyal to DukeandduchessofCambridge.

This scandal is going to be really, really bad.

Forgot to post the link!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What news are there of these royal? I don't see any news of them at all.
My DH and DD in a locked up Canada are doing more things than these two!

The funny thing is -- they're as active as they ever were pre-Covid (which means negligible) but no one cares. I personally think that's because all of their work is disjointed. They don't know how to connect their campaigns or initiatives to each other or themselves.

They've been meeting with people. They don't need connected campaigns or initiatives. They are already connecting with people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What news are there of these royal? I don't see any news of them at all.
My DH and DD in a locked up Canada are doing more things than these two!

The funny thing is -- they're as active as they ever were pre-Covid (which means negligible) but no one cares. I personally think that's because all of their work is disjointed. They don't know how to connect their campaigns or initiatives to each other or themselves.

They've been meeting with people. They don't need connected campaigns or initiatives. They are already connecting with people.

Unfortunately they’re connecting with the wrong people. Kensington palace is the center of the royals for hire scandal. William and Kate can’t even stop fraud and corruption in their own household.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s the point of royals again (other than leeching off of tax payers)

Well the BRF make a lot of money for the British public. They're a huge net positive, economically.

The point of royals is tradition, pride, national identity. Kinda wish we had that. Instead we have athletes, actors, tech moguls. None of them represent tradition, national pride or identity. Just money.

Not really. All the palaces and associated tourism generates a lot of money for the UK. Ending the monarchy wouldn’t erase that—quite the contrary. The palaces that are currently used as private residences could become tourist destinations much like Versailles.

That's a nice talking point. But let's think about it for more than one second. Without a royal family, there would be no Trooping the Color, no more changing of the guard, indeed no more royal weddings or royal funerals. Etc.

If you are a transactional person who only thinks in dollar signs, then the royal family is a keeper.

You picked some bad examples. Each of those events cost tens of millions. Easily replaced by a national day not centered around one family and tourists go to England to see the palaces/castles not the royals. There’s no daily viewing of the Queen.

The UK lost billions in tourism revenue thanks to Covid, none of those costs were offset by having living royals in their palaces. It was compounded.

I thought it went without saying that 2020 was different. Sorry for making that assumption...

2020 is a great baseline to show royals don’t bring in money, palaces do and the UK has plenty of them.

Lol

If you're going to say that 2020 is the economy that we should be making decisions off of...

Goodbye working women. You belong at home.

DP. Maybe they bring in UK tourism or not but what is the argument for the Commonwealth countries? They send them money and they certainly don’t bring in tourism to any of those places. Pretty sure people don’t travel to Canada because there’s a Queen in the UK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s the point of royals again (other than leeching off of tax payers)

Well the BRF make a lot of money for the British public. They're a huge net positive, economically.

The point of royals is tradition, pride, national identity. Kinda wish we had that. Instead we have athletes, actors, tech moguls. None of them represent tradition, national pride or identity. Just money.

Not really. All the palaces and associated tourism generates a lot of money for the UK. Ending the monarchy wouldn’t erase that—quite the contrary. The palaces that are currently used as private residences could become tourist destinations much like Versailles.

That's a nice talking point. But let's think about it for more than one second. Without a royal family, there would be no Trooping the Color, no more changing of the guard, indeed no more royal weddings or royal funerals. Etc.

If you are a transactional person who only thinks in dollar signs, then the royal family is a keeper.

You picked some bad examples. Each of those events cost tens of millions. Easily replaced by a national day not centered around one family and tourists go to England to see the palaces/castles not the royals. There’s no daily viewing of the Queen.

The UK lost billions in tourism revenue thanks to Covid, none of those costs were offset by having living royals in their palaces. It was compounded.

I thought it went without saying that 2020 was different. Sorry for making that assumption...

2020 is a great baseline to show royals don’t bring in money, palaces do and the UK has plenty of them.

Lol

If you're going to say that 2020 is the economy that we should be making decisions off of...

Goodbye working women. You belong at home.

DP. Maybe they bring in UK tourism or not but what is the argument for the Commonwealth countries? They send them money and they certainly don’t bring in tourism to any of those places. Pretty sure people don’t travel to Canada because there’s a Queen in the UK.

Did you disagree with the first post in this quote?

[Anonymous]

A great article by Prince Michael's daughter's ex-boyfriend. Talk about premonitions:

https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2018/04/race-and-the-royals-inside-kensington-palace

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What’s the point of royals again (other than leeching off of tax payers)

Unless you're British, it's none of your business.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s the point of royals again (other than leeching off of tax payers)

Unless you're British, it's none of your business.

The British people hate them. The Americans are defending them. It is funny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s the point of royals again (other than leeching off of tax payers)

Unless you're British, it's none of your business.

The British people hate them. The Americans are defending them. It is funny.

NP. This is not true at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What news are there of these royal? I don't see any news of them at all.
My DH and DD in a locked up Canada are doing more things than these two!

The funny thing is -- they're as active as they ever were pre-Covid (which means negligible) but no one cares. I personally think that's because all of their work is disjointed. They don't know how to connect their campaigns or initiatives to each other or themselves.

They've been meeting with people. They don't need connected campaigns or initiatives. They are already connecting with people.

Kate just released a book called Hold Still that is the #1 UK bestseller on Amazon (and in Spain, Singapore, Sweden, Brazil, India, France and Japan. The millions in proceeds will be shared between the national portrait gallery and the UK's leading mental health charity, Mind. The Earthshot prize launched by William just held a panel at the Tony Blair institute. This is the most prestigious environmental prize in history - 5 million pounds a year for the next ten years.

they've been doing plenty - you just arent paying attention because you dont want to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What news are there of these royal? I don't see any news of them at all.
My DH and DD in a locked up Canada are doing more things than these two!

The funny thing is -- they're as active as they ever were pre-Covid (which means negligible) but no one cares. I personally think that's because all of their work is disjointed. They don't know how to connect their campaigns or initiatives to each other or themselves.

They've been meeting with people. They don't need connected campaigns or initiatives. They are already connecting with people.

Kate just released a book called Hold Still that is the #1 UK bestseller on Amazon (and in Spain, Singapore, Sweden, Brazil, India, France and Japan. The millions in proceeds will be shared between the national portrait gallery and the UK's leading mental health charity, Mind. The Earthshot prize launched by William just held a panel at the Tony Blair institute. This is the most prestigious environmental prize in history - 5 million pounds a year for the next ten years.

they've been doing plenty - you just arent paying attention because you dont want to.

Does that make up for the environmental damage that their trips cause?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What news are there of these royal? I don't see any news of them at all.
My DH and DD in a locked up Canada are doing more things than these two!

The funny thing is -- they're as active as they ever were pre-Covid (which means negligible) but no one cares. I personally think that's because all of their work is disjointed. They don't know how to connect their campaigns or initiatives to each other or themselves.

They've been meeting with people. They don't need connected campaigns or initiatives. They are already connecting with people.

Kate just released a book called Hold Still that is the #1 UK bestseller on Amazon (and in Spain, Singapore, Sweden, Brazil, India, France and Japan. The millions in proceeds will be shared between the national portrait gallery and the UK's leading mental health charity, Mind. The Earthshot prize launched by William just held a panel at the Tony Blair institute. This is the most prestigious environmental prize in history - 5 million pounds a year for the next ten years.

they've been doing plenty - you just arent paying attention because you dont want to.

Does that make up for the environmental damage that their trips cause?

What trips? They haven’t gone anywhere in over a year.

[Anonymous]

you honestly think Kate wrote a book? ever heard of ghostwriters? honestly you can't be that smart or curious and survive the royal family. Your entire life is about submitting to over the top traditions, having zero opinions and standing around smiling. Meghan was too smart and american for that