Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aaron Parnas:

Important update: Major criminal investigation opened after Epstein files released as Trump asks public to move on:

Human trafficking investigation opened in Lithuania.

Poland investigates Epstein’s ties to Russia.

DOJ caught redacting Melania Trump’s face. Trump judge caught in Epstein files.

Spread the word: https://open.substack.com/pub/aaronparnas/p/important-update-major-human-trafficking?r

The Western Press Are Trying To Spin Epstein As A RUSSIAN Agent

This is of course ridiculous. Epstein is a known intelligence operative for the state of Israel, not Russia. This is an established fact, and has been for some time.

Epstein documents have been confirming for months that he was clearly and undeniably an Israeli intelligence operative, which the latest round of releases have strongly reinforced. So naturally the western media are running with the story that Epstein worked for Vladimir Putin.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2026/02/03/the-western-press-are-trying-to-spin-epstein-as-a-russian-agent/

You are ridiculous. Epstein worked with both. He was a spy for any country who would pay him. I get it, you loathe Israel. But don’t let your hatred color reality. Epstein was linked to both. He was a mercenary spy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aaron Parnas:

Important update: Major criminal investigation opened after Epstein files released as Trump asks public to move on:

Human trafficking investigation opened in Lithuania.

Poland investigates Epstein’s ties to Russia.

DOJ caught redacting Melania Trump’s face. Trump judge caught in Epstein files.

Spread the word: https://open.substack.com/pub/aaronparnas/p/important-update-major-human-trafficking?r

The Western Press Are Trying To Spin Epstein As A RUSSIAN Agent

This is of course ridiculous. Epstein is a known intelligence operative for the state of Israel, not Russia. This is an established fact, and has been for some time.

Epstein documents have been confirming for months that he was clearly and undeniably an Israeli intelligence operative, which the latest round of releases have strongly reinforced. So naturally the western media are running with the story that Epstein worked for Vladimir Putin.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2026/02/03/the-western-press-are-trying-to-spin-epstein-as-a-russian-agent/

The main thing to focus on right now is justice for the victims of sexual assault and trafficking. And obviously, pedophilia. There's plenty of time to trace back which governments benefited from and manipulated this information. For now, eyes on the prize: getting the criminals brought to justice.

[Anonymous]

There are literally pictures of toddlers bound. Its insanity

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm currently in the UK. Two of the men here mentioned in the files - "Prince" Andrew and Peter Mandelson - have fallen from grace big time, thanks to authorities moving to strip them of their honors (Andrew lost his titles, and Mandelson lost his ambassadorship and place in the House of Lords) and instigating investigations. Why have there been no similar moves in the US? I find it bizarre that the three people who have been most publicly (and rightly) humiliated by associating with Epstein - Andrew, Mandelson and Ghislaine Maxwell - are all Brits.

Because, it would seem, the people charged with investigating these crimes are also the very same people who 1) need to be investigated or 2) so closely linked/reliant on those in no.1 that their own self interest is at risk and/or 3) are terrified of the ramifications of their investigation because those people vested with the power to protect them are the same people identified in 1 and 2.

This conspiracy has spanned 4 presidencies! Im not both siding this. Katherine Rample (spelling) was in Obama WH.
Bill Clinton was friendly with him.

These people are dreaming of building “amazing new alliances” and “finding things on their way to collapse.” The sex abuse was a sidebar.

Exactly. The bigger picture is this is the sort of moral rot that happens when you combine an oligarchic economic system with access to absolute power. These "bros" are mostly intellectually unimpressive, but with no moral or ethical compass that prevents them from amassing power and money. They find each other through people like Epstein. The whole system of billionaires buying and subverting democracies has to end.

Exactly and this keeps getting buried here. DCUM is full of achievement and empty of intellect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aaron Parnas:

Important update: Major criminal investigation opened after Epstein files released as Trump asks public to move on:

Human trafficking investigation opened in Lithuania.

Poland investigates Epstein’s ties to Russia.

DOJ caught redacting Melania Trump’s face. Trump judge caught in Epstein files.

Spread the word: https://open.substack.com/pub/aaronparnas/p/important-update-major-human-trafficking?r

The Western Press Are Trying To Spin Epstein As A RUSSIAN Agent

This is of course ridiculous. Epstein is a known intelligence operative for the state of Israel, not Russia. This is an established fact, and has been for some time.

Epstein documents have been confirming for months that he was clearly and undeniably an Israeli intelligence operative, which the latest round of releases have strongly reinforced. So naturally the western media are running with the story that Epstein worked for Vladimir Putin.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2026/02/03/the-western-press-are-trying-to-spin-epstein-as-a-russian-agent/

The more they do this, it becomes the more obvious it was Israel all along.

Sure, Epstein had dealings with other countries, but his primary aim was blackmail on behalf of the Israeli state. That includes Russia and even Iran! Yes, Epstein's origin story goes back to the Iran Contra affair.

[Anonymous]

The little I’ve seen is so vile, so widespread, and so incriminating for Trump. It’s shocking he wasn’t impeached this week. This is a group of 100-200 men who are depraved and intent on ruining the world, yes world, for their own sick fantasies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There are literally pictures of toddlers bound. Its insanity

You have the link?
Because I don’t believe you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ummmm they ate him! They were impregnating the girls and taking the babies

Why though? For what purpose? Are they schizophrenic?

Adenochrome. Its in the files. They are worshipping Moloch and sacrificing them. jE even writes in his emails that “newborns taste like cream cheese”. Its absolutely insane and horrifying.

Its all there.

This is ridiculous and absurd. Who is Moloch? This is so stupid.

It's absolutely stupid until you find out that Epstein started /poI/ on 4chan and Maxwell was a reddit supermod on /worldnews.

All the craziest dumbass internet conspiracies of the past decade tie back to freaking Epstein and Maxwell. It's utterly insane but true. The penultimate red pill.

They divided us against each other.

[Anonymous]

I think it's obscene that the revelations in the Epstein files are not front page news.

It's also obscenely stupid that this thread has been taken over with an insane person obsessed with Israel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are literally pictures of toddlers bound. Its insanity

You have the link?
Because I don’t believe you.

You're asking the PP to post child porn?

The NY Times has confirmed that victims' photos were published by the DOJ without even their faces redacted, as if that is enough..

[Anonymous]

Here's a gift link to the article by the NY Times about the nude photos posted by the DOJ.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/01/us/nude-photos-epstein-files.html?unlocked_article_code=1.JlA.pp0P.BCvWEUJeloSL&smid=url-share

How on earth can we possibly prosecute child pornographers if our DOJ is so careless as to publish these photos (which were not previously on the internet) themselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here's a gift link to the article by the NY Times about the nude photos posted by the DOJ.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/01/us/nude-photos-epstein-files.html?unlocked_article_code=1.JlA.pp0P.BCvWEUJeloSL&smid=url-share

How on earth can we possibly prosecute child pornographers if our DOJ is so careless as to publish these photos (which were not previously on the internet) themselves.

It is very simple: our government doesn’t GAF about the victims. It is clear that none of the men involved will suffer any repercussions beyond public embarrassment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are literally pictures of toddlers bound. Its insanity

You have the link?
Because I don’t believe you.

You're asking the PP to post child porn?

The NY Times has confirmed that victims' photos were published by the DOJ without even their faces redacted, as if that is enough..

I wasn’t.
I just wanted a source for this.
There is a lot of information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are literally pictures of toddlers bound. Its insanity

You have the link?
Because I don’t believe you.

You're asking the PP to post child porn?

The NY Times has confirmed that victims' photos were published by the DOJ without even their faces redacted, as if that is enough..

I wasn’t.
I just wanted a source for this.
There is a lot of information.

Well, if it's important to you to find out if that's really out there, then I guess you'll have to google that. But I wouldn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are literally pictures of toddlers bound. Its insanity

You have the link?
Because I don’t believe you.

You're asking the PP to post child porn?

The NY Times has confirmed that victims' photos were published by the DOJ without even their faces redacted, as if that is enough..

I wasn’t.
I just wanted a source for this.
There is a lot of information.

Well, if it's important to you to find out if that's really out there, then I guess you'll have to google that. But I wouldn't.

The article was good enough.