Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
They're not going to "use bike lanes." They're going to "go places." Just like you go places, except you go in a car. Maybe you should try taking the bus some time, too. |
The 13-year-old was hit crossing the on-ramp to the inner loop, just south of the Beltway. https://www2.montgomerycountymd.gov/mcgportalapps/Press_Detail_Pol.aspx?Item_ID=31844 |
Great, so you really have nothing to rebut here? |
Without bikes then bike lanes are useless for them to “go places”. |
You claimed that WJ students were hit. While the incident is unfortunate, that is not a WJ student and it was not during school hours. |
The bike lanes would not have prevented that incident because the ramp still exists. |
I'm not claiming. It's a fact. Why do you think there are those two newish signals on Democracy at WJ? The police don't put out a press release every time there's a car crash. It's not uncommon at all for students all over the county to get hit on their way to school or coming back from school. Just because you personally don't know about it doesn't mean it doesn't happen. |
Those “newish signals” are HAWK signals and they were installed a decade ago. You cannot seem to get your story straight. |
Ok, they will use the bike lanes to go places. They can also use the bike lanes on e-scooters, of course. Or skateboards, e or non-e. Or they'll use the bike lanes to walk in groups that are too big for the sidewalks. The assumption of "halfway across the county" is a bit odd, too. I could bike pretty comfortably in 40 minutes on a 7-mile route between Northwood and Woodward. From Einstein, which is also in the DCC, it would be much closer, obviously. There's a whole world out there that you're not seeing from behind the windshield of your car. |
Yes, they're HAWK signals. No, they weren't installed a decade ago. https://twitter.com/Andrew_Friedson/status/1286732312521179138 |
So you agree that bike lanes are not the appropriate policy response to pedestrian safety. So why do you keep claiming otherwise? |
Between the Gish Gallop and the goalpost-moving, you're getting a lot of exercise. Nobody has said bike lanes are not an appropriate policy response to pedestrian safety. Quite the opposite: they are a well-known strategy, endorsed by the Federal Highway Administration, for making streets safer for everyone, including pedestrians. https://highways.dot.gov/safety/proven-safety-countermeasures |
Changing goalposts you say? Trying to claim that a bike lane is really for pedestrians is pretty bottom barrel. I also appreciate the need for the last word. Cheers. |
DP Why shouldn’t pedestrians be allowed to use a bike lane? Before cars, everyone used the street. It doesn’t just belong to cars. Or cyclists. |
Cyclists believe that bike lanes should be a space exclusively for them. But that they should also be able to use the sidewalk or roadway whenever they want as well. |