My kid had good results but it was admittedly because they applied to schools one level “lower” than T-20. Sometimes I wonder if they should have aimed higher, applied to more reaches, but after seeing threads like this, where kids with higher stats and more impressive EC’s had disappointing results, I’m glad they took a more risk-averse approach. |
Haven't read through the 50+ pages -- but if JHU was ED, were the other schools only RD? Did they not offer EA? Why RD if you could EA? |
+1. I have actual researchers in my family. They aren't clamoring to supervise summer high school students. Also, what were the hospital volunteer hours? It's impossible to get volunteer hours in a NOVA hospital unless there is a connection or you work in the gift shop. Everyone knows the non-profit stuff is BS. OP DD's application seems entirely manufactured and boring. |
+1, undergrads are hardly useful in a lab, so why do we think high schoolers would get anything productive done. |
This is the heart of it. I am out of the game now, one out of college, one in college now. We lived this disappointment too with our first one. It opened my eyes to the fact that this profile of the OP is like thousands of other top students. Graded are great, but so are others. Test scores are great. Princeton rejects hundreds of kids with perfect SATs. Something else has to make a kid shine, and “founding nonprofit” is absolutely not it these days. Something else in that application, whether the essay, something specific in a letter of recommendation, a lived experience, passion project that shows drivers and commitment, etc., has to make the admissions officer sit up and *notice.* OP profile doesn’t |
Yep. It’s why the good CCO will recommend listing an out of left field EC/pt job or sometimes even just a hobby. It personalizes the stem kids where this phenomenon is most prevalent. |
Yep. Georgia Tech is #2 |
BME is a hard major to apply for.
The most successful applicants tend to emphasize their non-stem side in selective applications. Though that might not work at JHU. |
I believe OP’s daughter did apply EA where she could, with the exception of UVA, which her counselor had wrongly indicated would be fine for RD because she was in-state, so she focused on her other early applications. OP has stated that, in hindsight, that was clearly a choice she would have made differently. The takeaway: apply EA to any school on your list (including in-state schools) that offers EA as an option. Many (many) pages in this thread are people belaboring the same point. |
What school did the OP's daughter decide to attend? |
Sometimes there is an error but as often as not it is just people not understanding or refusing to understand how the actual state of the system and how it actually works. The system isn't f'd up; it is opaque and heavily oversubscribed at the very top but for the vast majority of people it works fine. What too many kids (and parents) fail to understand or admit is that: The system is aligned around institutional priorities and what they value, not the applicants opinion of what should be valued. Top schools are optimizing for reputational and financial outputs, they are not optimizing inputs. Top student academics look mostly similar and interchangeable. |
Sometimes there is an error but as often as not it is just people not understanding or refusing to understand how the actual state of the system and how it actually works. The system isn't f'd up; it is opaque and heavily oversubscribed at the very top but for the vast majority of people it works fine. What too many kids (and parents) fail to understand or admit is that: The system is aligned around institutional priorities and what they value, not the applicants opinion of what should be valued. Top schools are optimizing for reputational and financial outputs, they are not optimizing inputs. Top student academics look mostly similar and interchangeable. |
This is usually the problem - especially for over-subscribed or STEM majors where everyone thinks there's a "formula" - research, published paper, internship, founding an app or non-profit, STEM awards, robotics club, math club. Kids just don't stand out. They are boring. I get bored just reading about them. If you are new to the process go to r/applyingtocollege, r/college results and r/chanceme - search "BME" or "biomedical engineering" and see the sheer number of descriptions (all with TOP stats) who are identical. |
Here's someone who got into JHU BME (think she was Val though) - I can see the thing that stands out about her, can you? https://www.reddit.com/r/collegeresults/comments/1k8sy8j/bme_baddie_bags_10_reach_schools_help_me_decide/ And she was not. There's a difference I see - does anyone else? https://www.reddit.com/r/collegeresults/comments/1k2dehb/overachieving_girl_potentially_robbed_in/ I'm curious about this kid's app and what major he applied to at Princeton: https://www.reddit.com/r/collegeresults/comments/1jofi3t/dude_from_the_suburbs_bags_a_few_ivies/ |
The whole author/started a non-profit thing worked for 2 or 3 cycles.
Originality is extremely rare. |