Others are challenging you on your interpretation of events. And you are challenging them on their interpretation. What's the big deal? |
Was Iran truly westernized? Or only sections of major cities, along with the governing elite? Unfortunately, a lot of what you mention speaks to the role of the US in the world, and the US as an ally. Are we safer not being allies? |
"Sorting yourselves out" is the thinking of an idealist. Your leaders and neighbors will always be looking out for themselves first. That's a fact of life. Look at the US. We are no different. But also, what does the CIA have to do with your country's monetary policy? |
Just another example of soft imperialism from the white liberal elite. Because you think that poor Black and Brown countries can’t take care of themselves. |
By "our" leaders, you mean leaders whom your country's intelligence has handpicked and continues to covertly support financially, military, and politically. Also, your question reveals you to be an unserious lightweight who has no place in this conversation. Go put the question into Google and start reading. Sometime in the next decade or so, you might catch up. In the meantime, it's OK to shut up and let people who actually know what they're talking about discuss. One of the worst things about native-born Americans, but especially you so-called progressives, is that you think you can just intuit, argue, and mindlessly slogan your way through complex issues. You have contempt for learning, foam at the mouth at any facts that contradict what you'd like to hear, and are too lazy to learn even recent history, much less learn from history. It makes you foolish voters who have squandered the democracy that your founding fathers handed you and dangerous policy makers who are making the world a worse place every day. |
The monetary part is the IMF and World Bank which the US is not leaving and which, even if we did leave the IMF, would still be what it is which is an expression of globalist economic ideology. |
You will corrupt from within. |
There are a lot of incorrect assumptions in your post, which I won't address. But I do appreciate: 1) Your reference to Google as a center of knowledge. 2) Your use of the phrase "unserious lightweight." 3) Describing a simple observation as "foaming at the mouth," which seems like exactly what you are doing in your response. |
Ironic since most of those "countries" have arbitrary boundaries drawn by the same elite. |
The CIA has nothing to do with monetary policy. |
Now people think USAID should be spending money on media to take out political leaders not liked by the leadership of the US. Yet people complained about Russia, Iran, China doing these things in US elections. |