What non political controversial position do you hold?

[Anonymous]

Book banning should just stop by both sides of the aisle. If you are going to start that shite in a school or bookstore, you better take out ever bible:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Book banning should just stop by both sides of the aisle. If you are going to start that shite in a school or bookstore, you better take out ever bible:

What books are banned by the left?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Book banning should just stop by both sides of the aisle. If you are going to start that shite in a school or bookstore, you better take out ever bible:

What books are banned by the left?

Exactly none.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Book banning should just stop by both sides of the aisle. If you are going to start that shite in a school or bookstore, you better take out ever bible:

What books are banned by the left?

Exactly none.

Wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A woman is a human person with a XX chromosome pair.

A man is a human person with a XY chromosome pair.

Apparently, this is a controversial position.

You are confusing sex with gender. Your sex is assigned at birth and is what is located between your legs. Gender is a social construct. It is in your brain. Many cultures throughout history have had 3,4, and even 5 different genders.

Then we need to base bathrooms, sports, etc on sex and not gender. Clears up a lot of confusion.

So you want this guy in the girl's bathroom?

IDGAF if this person's in the girls' bathroom. I just want to pee, wash my hands, and get out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Book banning should just stop by both sides of the aisle. If you are going to start that shite in a school or bookstore, you better take out ever bible:

What books are banned by the left?

Exactly none.

Wrong.

Ok, then give us an example.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Book banning should just stop by both sides of the aisle. If you are going to start that shite in a school or bookstore, you better take out ever bible:

What books are banned by the left?

Exactly none.

Wrong.

Ok, then give us an example.

Is it that hard to google??? To Kill a Mockingbird was banned in CA schools. By liberals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Book banning should just stop by both sides of the aisle. If you are going to start that shite in a school or bookstore, you better take out ever bible:

What books are banned by the left?

Exactly none.

Wrong.

Ok, then give us an example.

Johnny the Walrus

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Book banning should just stop by both sides of the aisle. If you are going to start that shite in a school or bookstore, you better take out ever bible:

What books are banned by the left?

Exactly none.

Wrong.

Ok, then give us an example.

Uh Liberals tried to cancel Dr. Seuss.

[Anonymous]

I hate pets. I’m an atheist.

[Anonymous]

Gap years after high school are stupid.

[Anonymous]

I hate petting sweaty things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Starbucks is terrible and overpriced

This is a fact. I don’t know why so many people go there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think a lot of people, including on this board, claim that their children are SN, because they don't want to admit that their kid has only average intelligence. Average/below average is not a SN.

We have this problem at my school all the time. Parents think because their kid is slow at reading or math that they have a SN. That’s not how it works. Some kids are just slow at reading or math. That’s all. And that doesn’t qualify you for special services. Sorry.

A new DCUM low - putting down children with difficulty reading and writing for requesting help. OMFG. Go to hell

NP
There is literally nothing in that post that puts down children with difficulties in reading or math. Absolutely nothing derogatory was said.

You don’t think it derogatory to say dyslexic children are just slow not SN?!

That’s not what was said AT ALL.

You said many don’t want to say their kids are average intelligence so they say they are SN.

But a huge amount of studied show high/average IQ and dyslexia are treated in school as stupid. Same with ADHD.

So your saying it’s not derogatory to say these kids are “just slow”?

That poster wasn’t me. But it sounds like she was saying not every slow reader deserves a diagnosis. Sometimes a slow reader is just…a slow reader. Same with math.
My daughter (15) is awful at math. So we got her a tutor. I’m pretty sure if we went looking for a diagnosis we would find one. But she doesn’t need a label - she just needs help in math. Because she’s really not good at it.

+1. There’s a difference in kids who have special needs and kids who just aren’t good at math. Both kids may be great at other things. Upper middle class parents just need to label their “not good at math” kid. Maybe they just don’t take to math!

Most kids bad at math should just be labeled as “kids with teachers who cant teachers math”. Hence the need for a tutor.

No sorry. But very DCUM of you to blame am the teacher. A child can be slow at math, and not have a SN or a bad teacher. Some kids are just slower at math. That doesn’t make them bad people. But it’s not always something you can “fix.”

Seriously. Aren't any if you bad at math?
I was and am "bad at math"
I had great teachers and it still didn't come easily to me. I struggled up to and including calculus and then have never used much math again.
I don't have a learning disability.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think a lot of people, including on this board, claim that their children are SN, because they don't want to admit that their kid has only average intelligence. Average/below average is not a SN.

We have this problem at my school all the time. Parents think because their kid is slow at reading or math that they have a SN. That’s not how it works. Some kids are just slow at reading or math. That’s all. And that doesn’t qualify you for special services. Sorry.

A new DCUM low - putting down children with difficulty reading and writing for requesting help. OMFG. Go to hell

NP
There is literally nothing in that post that puts down children with difficulties in reading or math. Absolutely nothing derogatory was said.

You don’t think it derogatory to say dyslexic children are just slow not SN?!

That’s not what was said AT ALL.

You said many don’t want to say their kids are average intelligence so they say they are SN.

But a huge amount of studied show high/average IQ and dyslexia are treated in school as stupid. Same with ADHD.

So your saying it’s not derogatory to say these kids are “just slow”?

That poster wasn’t me. But it sounds like she was saying not every slow reader deserves a diagnosis. Sometimes a slow reader is just…a slow reader. Same with math.
My daughter (15) is awful at math. So we got her a tutor. I’m pretty sure if we went looking for a diagnosis we would find one. But she doesn’t need a label - she just needs help in math. Because she’s really not good at it.

+1. There’s a difference in kids who have special needs and kids who just aren’t good at math. Both kids may be great at other things. Upper middle class parents just need to label their “not good at math” kid. Maybe they just don’t take to math!

Most kids bad at math should just be labeled as “kids with teachers who cant teachers math”. Hence the need for a tutor.

No sorry. But very DCUM of you to blame am the teacher. A child can be slow at math, and not have a SN or a bad teacher. Some kids are just slower at math. That doesn’t make them bad people. But it’s not always something you can “fix.”

Seriously. Aren't any if you bad at math?
I was and am "bad at math"
I had great teachers and it still didn't come easily to me. I struggled up to and including calculus and then have never used much math again.
I don't have a learning disability.

There has actually been a good amount of research on the idea of being “bad at math” and the implications of labeling somebody as such, but I’m wondering how you would feel about labeling a kid in elementary school who is behind on reading as “bad at reading?” I think it has the feel of being some permanent state rather than just not having had enough good instruction and practice.