|
results.osse.dc.gov
Nice dashboard display! Congrats to Brookland Middle, Langley, Noyes, Seaton, Burroughs, West, and many others on their strong performamce! |
| Eliot-Hine, Stuart-Hobson, Amidon-Bowen, too. |
| Coolidge did better, Anacostia and Ballou as well. |
| Too bad PARCC is such a crappy test that every state that signed up to the PARCC Consortium a decade ago, yes all 23, has ditched this test by now. Knowing that, I see no reason to take these scores seriously. |
Yes we know there are lots of people who think PARCC sucks. This is a thread for those who are interested in trendlines or a particular school's performance. Feel free to find one of the past PARCC sucks threads or start a new one. DC has to have a statewide test per ESSA. I'm just as glad we aren't sucking millions in taxpayer dollars developing yet another one. Just use PARCC and move along. |
| There are some real dips in the data too. SSMA, ouch! And is this the end of the line for Harmony? |
| Holy cow, Garrison is up massively. |
|
Looks like this year Shepherd has enough white kids to report their PARCC results--94 in both reading and math, so comparable to WOTP schools.
Just picking a couple of WOTP schools at random, Janney's white students' scores are 90/86, and Lafeyette's are 86/90. However, Shepherd's black and Hispanic students scores are far lower, which suggests there is room for improvement there--54/50 for black students, and 40/30 for Hispanic students. In comparison, I looked at Lafayette's black student scores--48/54, and Janney, 59/45. Doesn't look like any of these schools are doing amazingly with black students. Interestingly, Lafayette's Hispanic scores are pretty high--89/75. Ditto for Lafayette, 86/68. I'd be interested to see what elementary schools have the highest PARCC scores for black and Latino students.. |
Jeff decides who gets to post about what, and where. Not you, mate. |
Great job Shepherd. It’s important to note that with Shepherd, 25% of their population (likely minority) are low income so not exactly apples to apples. What’s even more impressive to me is the scores between at risk and not at risk are very close 50/50 vs 60/56. Compare that with Lafayette (32/47 vs 82/84) and Murch (Janney didn’t have enough at risk) of (38/23 vs 76/76). |
PP here, and yes, both of these are important points--considering the more varied SES of Shepherd's students when looking at test scores, and the data indicating that at-risk students are being served relatively well, judging by the close margin between at-risk/not at-risk scores. |
|
Once again, Banneker's ELA scores are the best in the city.
|
Yep, pushing out the underperformers and not meeting IEPs will do that. |
| Creative Minds continues its downward spiral. Not at-risk scores a whopping 41/48 compared to their at-risk population of 14/16. |
| LAMB down quite a bit. Mundo is underwhelming as well. |