| The game reports are wrong then. Every age group had play ups, including the U17 team. |
| All of this is still consistent with the coaching staff challenging the player over trying for the win. I know it's frustrating, but they are favoring putting players in difficult situations vs tilting the odds toward scoring for a reason. If they were focused on the win, they would put the 04s in instead of the 05, as you said. |
Challenging is only challenging if the player is stretched but able to compete. That's not what's happening here. |
| FCV has more talent on its teams. That 05 is really good. When you see her, she is getting it done out there. I don't mind play ups when they belong. |
|
And yet, still, it's consistent with the club trying to develop a player they view as having potential at the cost of team wins. That's a player focused club. It's just that this poster doesn't want that, they want wins. It's clear from the repeated posts about losing, the fawning over FCV, etc. It doesn't sound like WS was ever the right fit for this person. And there's nothing wrong with that. But it doesn't make sense for this individual to stay in a club not focused on winning, especially when it's clear they are a lot more interested in putting younger players in challenging positions when they feel it makes sense (I know this poster doesn't; they are also not a pro coach).
At some point there needs to be an acceptance that this type of parent or player needs to go for broke and move to FCV or similar club, where the focus is almost exclusively on winning and not player development, at least at the highest level. |
|
May be in poor taste, but it’s not unacceptable.
It’s part of the program and easily drives decisions of others to stay or leave. |
|
A player centric club doesn't roster 25 players. That is for sure though a club that likes getting in those checks.
A player centric club keeps a smaller roster that allows players time to actually play. That's a huge part of development. |
Nah, actually many didn't bother with FCV at all, due to rep. And plenty of skilled ones too, so don't go there. Some people are just tuned into how they operate and aren't fans. |
+1 |
Also, don't believe everything you read. Especially here. The one truth that has come up in this crazy thread is that if you are thinking about ECNL or DA clubs for your child next year, you should go watch some games and, if you like what you see, ask whether she can participate in some practices in advance of ID sessions. This is true for FCV, Spirit VA, Spirit MD, Arlington, VDA, BRYC, Mclean. they all have different approaches and different coaching styles and I'm sure all will have some success getting girls in front of college coaches and into college programs. |
Factually, WS has several that tried out at FCV, some 2 years in a row and weren't given offers. |
You're right. That wouldn't accomplish anything for anyone. |
Then I guess people should quite feigning surpirse and shock, if this is normal for youth soccer. Where there's smoke, there's fire. Players leacving last year, players talking of leaving this year, something is amiss. Either way, it comes out eventually. |
Good summary. Watch the games and participate in the practices. Get to really know the club to the best of your ability. |
Also factually, my DD and others we know at Spirit avoided FCV like the plague and did not even bother with their sessions. I think a couple of Spirit players last year moved to FCV. There’s no good or bad statement to be made either way. Those who prefer player development select WS and those who value winning at any cost prefer FCV. I’m ok with that and it’s just easier to accept the way it is instead of fight the reality. |