Little pink monster blog

[Anonymous]

It is inevitable. He’s too much of a “good father” for them to separate that his actions towards their mother aren’t what “good husbands” do.
And of course Natasha is an example to them but I think that’s why she’s speaking up now. At what point of Natasha just letting him do this to her over and over and over again, is she responsible for the repercussions the girls will face from all of this. If her daughters are tricked into the same kind of controlling relationship, Natasha still has the chance to show them that they aren’t victims.
Power to her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It is inevitable. He’s too much of a “good father” for them to separate that his actions towards their mother aren’t what “good husbands” do.
And of course Natasha is an example to them but I think that’s why she’s speaking up now. At what point of Natasha just letting him do this to her over and over and over again, is she responsible for the repercussions the girls will face from all of this. If her daughters are tricked into the same kind of controlling relationship, Natasha still has the chance to show them that they aren’t victims.
Power to her.

Agree and if he's playing this many head games with her you know he's manipulating those children too. Way to pass the torch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha has stated this happened, and none of the accused have denied it. Why would it be made up? When Kane made his accusations against Natasha, the first thing she did was post that they weren't true.

Why not make it up? It helps her gain sympathy and attention. Which is clearly what she wants. Yeah and supposedly that was a lie as she did enter rehab for drugs and lost custody. They both sound shady.

Just so you know, the rehab and “why do you think this happened” gives off the impression that this is someone associated with the show. We have no way to confirm or deny, so your rebuttal is useless. But we’re all definitely thinking it...

Just so you know, the claims that she’s put in the work from her addiction and changed for the better give the impression that it’s Natasha’s friends and family posting.

I'm one of the pps and I don't know her or any of her family. I just believe her.

Maybe it isn't always someone related to her but people who know what he's really like.

And people who know what she’s really like.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha has stated this happened, and none of the accused have denied it. Why would it be made up? When Kane made his accusations against Natasha, the first thing she did was post that they weren't true.

Why not make it up? It helps her gain sympathy and attention. Which is clearly what she wants. Yeah and supposedly that was a lie as she did enter rehab for drugs and lost custody. They both sound shady.

She says herself in her last few IG posts that they have shared custody. Why would she lie to get sympathy and attention, from who? A few followers on Instagram? All she seems to have been wanting through any of this is access to her girls and for him to leave her alone.

Also, the references to rehab/drugs are tired. If it's true, she seems to have completely done the work and changed her life for the better. What's he done? He's still playing head games with her by using their children. It's so sad.

She lost custody then it changed to shared custody once she finished rehab. I don’t understand why those references are tired but her claiming he watched her on video are not tired. It supposedly happened years ago. Why would she post her personal business at all? When you are posting on social media it’s bc you want a reaction. She has more sympathy from just her followers on IG, as this thread shows.

How is posting on social media granting her access to her kids? Isn’t that an issue for the courts? Well for starters, he takes care of his kids and has a job. What else do you want him to do? We have no idea the “head games” that he is playing. It’s all hearsay which is sad. I stand by that they are both shady.

Because seriously who cares about this anymore, it happened years ago and she seems to have moved on and improved herself. It's also literally only rumors we've read here. We've also read rumors here that he drinks and has a pill popping slur session on the radio, yet everyone keeps harping on N. I agree with the pp it seems to be a few people associated with him and/or the show that keep bumping this thread with the same bashing of her. Move on.

Then why do you care about him watching her?! It happened years ago too. Why does one cancel the other out? Why is one more important than the other? Everything on here and on Natasha’s IG post is a rumor. I agree with a pp who said it’s clearly ppl associated with her/her friends or the women who left the show that keep this thread going. Move on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha has stated this happened, and none of the accused have denied it. Why would it be made up? When Kane made his accusations against Natasha, the first thing she did was post that they weren't true.

Why not make it up? It helps her gain sympathy and attention. Which is clearly what she wants. Yeah and supposedly that was a lie as she did enter rehab for drugs and lost custody. They both sound shady.

She says herself in her last few IG posts that they have shared custody. Why would she lie to get sympathy and attention, from who? A few followers on Instagram? All she seems to have been wanting through any of this is access to her girls and for him to leave her alone.

Also, the references to rehab/drugs are tired. If it's true, she seems to have completely done the work and changed her life for the better. What's he done? He's still playing head games with her by using their children. It's so sad.

She lost custody then it changed to shared custody once she finished rehab. I don’t understand why those references are tired but her claiming he watched her on video are not tired. It supposedly happened years ago. Why would she post her personal business at all? When you are posting on social media it’s bc you want a reaction. She has more sympathy from just her followers on IG, as this thread shows.

How is posting on social media granting her access to her kids? Isn’t that an issue for the courts? Well for starters, he takes care of his kids and has a job. What else do you want him to do? We have no idea the “head games” that he is playing. It’s all hearsay which is sad. I stand by that they are both shady.

Because seriously who cares about this anymore, it happened years ago and she seems to have moved on and improved herself. It's also literally only rumors we've read here. We've also read rumors here that he drinks and has a pill popping slur session on the radio, yet everyone keeps harping on N. I agree with the pp it seems to be a few people associated with him and/or the show that keep bumping this thread with the same bashing of her. Move on.

Then why do you care about him watching her?! It happened years ago too. Why does one cancel the other out? Why is one more important than the other? Everything on here and on Natasha’s IG post is a rumor. I agree with a pp who said it’s clearly ppl associated with her/her friends or the women who left the show that keep this thread going. Move on.

I said this before but assuming both the addiction thing and the spying thing are true, to me one is a personal failing in an individual but it doesn't necessarily speak to the person's character. Good people can become drug addicts. Good people can heal from drug addiction. Certainly there are bad people addicted to drugs as well but the sole fact that someone is a drug addict doesn't tell me if the person is a good person or a person worth hoping for and helping.

The kind of person who would spy on their ex while they are alone in their home is a bad person. That is an action that is character defining and something that I don't think you can really fix. It is a sociopathic thing. There is no treatment for sociopathy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Natasha has stated this happened, and none of the accused have denied it. Why would it be made up? When Kane made his accusations against Natasha, the first thing she did was post that they weren't true.

Why not make it up? It helps her gain sympathy and attention. Which is clearly what she wants. Yeah and supposedly that was a lie as she did enter rehab for drugs and lost custody. They both sound shady.

She says herself in her last few IG posts that they have shared custody. Why would she lie to get sympathy and attention, from who? A few followers on Instagram? All she seems to have been wanting through any of this is access to her girls and for him to leave her alone.

Also, the references to rehab/drugs are tired. If it's true, she seems to have completely done the work and changed her life for the better. What's he done? He's still playing head games with her by using their children. It's so sad.

She lost custody then it changed to shared custody once she finished rehab. I don’t understand why those references are tired but her claiming he watched her on video are not tired. It supposedly happened years ago. Why would she post her personal business at all? When you are posting on social media it’s bc you want a reaction. She has more sympathy from just her followers on IG, as this thread shows.

How is posting on social media granting her access to her kids? Isn’t that an issue for the courts? Well for starters, he takes care of his kids and has a job. What else do you want him to do? We have no idea the “head games” that he is playing. It’s all hearsay which is sad. I stand by that they are both shady.

Because seriously who cares about this anymore, it happened years ago and she seems to have moved on and improved herself. It's also literally only rumors we've read here. We've also read rumors here that he drinks and has a pill popping slur session on the radio, yet everyone keeps harping on N. I agree with the pp it seems to be a few people associated with him and/or the show that keep bumping this thread with the same bashing of her. Move on.

Then why do you care about him watching her?! It happened years ago too. Why does one cancel the other out? Why is one more important than the other? Everything on here and on Natasha’s IG post is a rumor. I agree with a pp who said it’s clearly ppl associated with her/her friends or the women who left the show that keep this thread going. Move on.

I said this before but assuming both the addiction thing and the spying thing are true, to me one is a personal failing in an individual but it doesn't necessarily speak to the person's character. Good people can become drug addicts. Good people can heal from drug addiction. Certainly there are bad people addicted to drugs as well but the sole fact that someone is a drug addict doesn't tell me if the person is a good person or a person worth hoping for and helping.

The kind of person who would spy on their ex while they are alone in their home is a bad person. That is an action that is character defining and something that I don't think you can really fix. It is a sociopathic thing. There is no treatment for sociopathy.

THIS!!!!!

[Anonymous]

Allegations. Maybe you are projecting your own psychological demons? Sociopath?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Allegations. Maybe you are projecting your own psychological demons? Sociopath?

Way to argue in bad faith. I was specifically answering the question of why one would find one bad behavior more sympathetic than the other. And I started my post saying that my thoughts were assuming for the sake of argument that both the chronic drug use and the spying (both rumors) were true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Allegations. Maybe you are projecting your own psychological demons? Sociopath?

Looks like Peter is working late here tonight posting. Yes, sociopath, YOU.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Allegations. Maybe you are projecting your own psychological demons? Sociopath?

Looks like Peter is working late here tonight posting. Yes, sociopath, YOU.

Hi Natasha.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Allegations. Maybe you are projecting your own psychological demons? Sociopath?

Looks like Peter is working late here tonight posting. Yes, sociopath, YOU.

Hi Natasha.

Hi Intern John

[Anonymous]

Pp here who explained the difference between drugs and spying morally, at least in my eyes. I am totally unconnected to any of this but if you all really are the parties involved and you're arguing on an anonymous message board than you all need help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Allegations. Maybe you are projecting your own psychological demons? Sociopath?

Looks like Peter is working late here tonight posting. Yes, sociopath, YOU.

Hi Natasha.

I'm the pp and I'm not Natasha. I'm guessing she's busy with her new husband, baby and life. How about you, Peter?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Allegations. Maybe you are projecting your own psychological demons? Sociopath?

Looks like Peter is working late here tonight posting. Yes, sociopath, YOU.

Hi Natasha.

I'm the pp and I'm not Natasha. I'm guessing she's busy with her new husband, baby and life. How about you, Peter?

You say you’re not but you are defending her like you are or as though you know her personally. I’m guessing he’s busy with his actual job and taking care of his two kids. See how that works? You claim something and someone can claim something too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Allegations. Maybe you are projecting your own psychological demons? Sociopath?

Looks like Peter is working late here tonight posting. Yes, sociopath, YOU.

Hi Natasha.

I'm the pp and I'm not Natasha. I'm guessing she's busy with her new husband, baby and life. How about you, Peter?

You say you’re not but you are defending her like you are or as though you know her personally. I’m guessing he’s busy with his actual job and taking care of his two kids. See how that works? You claim something and someone can claim something too.

I'm the pp who first said that spying in that way was sociopathic (but not tee immediate pp). I'm definitely not natasha and can even prove it. I live in and am posting from Maine and assume my ip address would confirm that of you want to ask Jeff.