Special Counsel Report on Classified Documents

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Republicans will stop at nothing to defend Trump. It’s shocking.

Pot.... meet kettle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She didn't listen to a word he said. Have to keep advancing that false narrative.......

He didn't find the necessary evidence or intent to charge Biden.

He didn't use the word exonerate, but the words in the report and his decision not to refer to prosecution, speak for itself.

Very different than even the Mueller Report.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Steve Cohen and Hank Johnson are two of the dumbest members of Congress.

Hope their voters are watching. They are an embarrassment.

McBath & Hageman give them a run for their money. Cringe. Soooo DC gov: “I’ll be aggressive and rude so no one will notice that I’m not very bright.”
We notice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The case is simple. Classified doc found in Biden residence from the time before he was President. Nothing else matters.

I’m sure you have the same level of standard for Trump. “Wull, no, see that’s different becuz he wuz prezident and that means you can do anything you want.”

I have standard for President Trump as well. If he broke the law he should get sentenced as well. The nice thing about Biden's case is that it is a slam dunk case. Technically, don't even need a trail.

[Anonymous]

All this because Biden’s SOTU was spectacular and the Hunter investigation revealed a nothingburger.

[Anonymous]

Did anyone bring up that a President cannot be indicted?

[Anonymous]

More Theater For Rubes from the GOP. The report didn't find anything to credibly charge Biden with, so now they screech for the cameras like a bunch of howler monkeys.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All this because Biden’s SOTU was spectacular and the Hunter investigation revealed a nothingburger.

It didn’t reveal a nothingburger, it revealed (again) the GOP’s intricate and intimate relationship with Russia.

But Biden’s SOTU was amazing.

[Anonymous]

Sums it up:

“Webster’s Dictionary defines ‘senile’ as exhibiting a decline of cognitive ability, such as memory, associated with old age,” Republican Rep. Scott Fitzgerald of Wisconsin said. “Mr. Hur, based on your report, did you find that the president was senile?”

“I did not. That conclusion does not appear in my report,” Hur replied emphatically.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/12/politics/takeaways-robert-hur-hearing/index.html

Give it up, MAGAs. Citing Hur to claim "Biden is senile" is now a dead talking point. Hur himself said so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Amazing people can read the transcripts and watch this hearing and not understand how in the tank Hur was on his report. The guy helped Rod Rosenstein "land the plan" on covering up the Mueller Report. Partisan hackery at its finest.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazing people can read the transcripts and watch this hearing and not understand how in the tank Hur was on his report. The guy helped Rod Rosenstein "land the plan" on covering up the Mueller Report. Partisan hackery at its finest.

+1

His refusal to acknowledge that he knew the report and this language would be public makes him look like a liar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All this because Biden’s SOTU was spectacular and the Hunter investigation revealed a nothingburger.

It didn’t reveal a nothingburger, it revealed (again) the GOP’s intricate and intimate relationship with Russia.

But Biden’s SOTU was amazing.

Touché PP!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The case is simple. Classified doc found in Biden residence from the time before he was President. Nothing else matters.

I’m sure you have the same level of standard for Trump. “Wull, no, see that’s different becuz he wuz prezident and that means you can do anything you want.”

I have standard for President Trump as well. If he broke the law he should get sentenced as well. The nice thing about Biden's case is that it is a slam dunk case. Technically, don't even need a trail.

Actually it isn't, which is why the Special Counsel chose not to recommend charges. He was very specific in noting that, if you actually read the report.

[Anonymous]

This reminds me of why I only get legal news from lawyers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This reminds me of why I only get legal news from lawyers.

I should have conditioned that on only legal news from lawyers not on cable news.