Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wallace has filed his amended complaint. Makes Blake look really bad, like she’s punching down. The judge should grant his MTD, and if he doesn’t, Blake should settle out of court and pay him what he’s asking for (14 million) and cut her losses. I think it’s pretty clear she’s caused this guy a lot of trouble, and he’s really just a regular person who got paid for a job and had never met Blake or Justin and knew nothing of the supposed SH. It’s a bit ridiculous that she’s suing him.

What you’re saying is insane. He’s a regular guy who could… remotely have $14 million in real damages from reputational damage? She should just go ahead and pay this “regular guy” $14 million (i.e., more money than an actual regular person will come close to earning in their entire life)? This take really shows you’ve jumped the shark.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The internalized misogyny on this thread is fascinating, and sad.

DP, and I totally agree with you. I can’t finish reading some of these posts, they give me the ick.

+2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The internalized misogyny on this thread is fascinating, and sad.

DP, and I totally agree with you. I can’t finish reading some of these posts, they give me the ick.

What gives me the ick is women who try to put other women in a box and say we must support Blake because she’s a woman and if we don’t we’re mommy sleuths with internalized misogyny. If your go to is insulting or shaming other women for not agreeing with you, it means you’ve lost on the merits of the debate and have moved on to ad hominem attacks. It’s really quite sad. [b]A familiar playbook even but won’t work here.

Agree, and yet happens on the regular with some of the Blake posters. The Holier than Thou attitude is such, to borrow a phrase, an “ick.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wallace has filed his amended complaint. Makes Blake look really bad, like she’s punching down. The judge should grant his MTD, and if he doesn’t, Blake should settle out of court and pay him what he’s asking for (14 million) and cut her losses. I think it’s pretty clear she’s caused this guy a lot of trouble, and he’s really just a regular person who got paid for a job and had never met Blake or Justin and knew nothing of the supposed SH. It’s a bit ridiculous that she’s suing him.

What you’re saying is insane. He’s a regular guy who could… remotely have $14 million in real damages from reputational damage? She should just go ahead and pay this “regular guy” $14 million (i.e., more money than an actual regular person will come close to earning in their entire life)? This take really shows you’ve jumped the shark.

Thank you.

To the PP: Wallace's lawyers of course want to position him as a "regular guy" who isn't even involved and should be dismissed from the case.

In reality, Wallace has a history of calling himself a "fixer", promising the ability to sculpt online sentiment to his will, and engaging in unethical business tactics. He has previously been sued for administering some kind of drug addiction program that, the plaintiff argued, almost killed him. He was repped by Bryan Freedman in that case from several years ago, the same Bryan Freedman who now reps Baldoni and has previously worked for Megyn Kelly and Perez Hilton.

Wallace is mentioned several times in the texts from Abel's phone, including in a text from Nathan reassuring Baldoni that Jamey Heath has spoken to Wallace to better understand the work he is doing for them.

Wallace, of course, is not in these texts because he only communicates via Signal. How many "regular people" do you know who only communicate via Signal?

I don't know if Wallace did anything worthy of liability in this case, but the idea he's just a regular fellow who has been unfairly dragged in by Blake is laughable. Or that she owes him 14 million, lol!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wallace has filed his amended complaint. Makes Blake look really bad, like she’s punching down. The judge should grant his MTD, and if he doesn’t, Blake should settle out of court and pay him what he’s asking for (14 million) and cut her losses. I think it’s pretty clear she’s caused this guy a lot of trouble, and he’s really just a regular person who got paid for a job and had never met Blake or Justin and knew nothing of the supposed SH. It’s a bit ridiculous that she’s suing him.

What you’re saying is insane. He’s a regular guy who could… remotely have $14 million in real damages from reputational damage? She should just go ahead and pay this “regular guy” $14 million (i.e., more money than an actual regular person will come close to earning in their entire life)? This take really shows you’ve jumped the shark.

Thank you.

To the PP: Wallace's lawyers of course want to position him as a "regular guy" who isn't even involved and should be dismissed from the case.

In reality, Wallace has a history of calling himself a "fixer", promising the ability to sculpt online sentiment to his will, and engaging in unethical business tactics. He has previously been sued for administering some kind of drug addiction program that, the plaintiff argued, almost killed him. He was repped by Bryan Freedman in that case from several years ago, the same Bryan Freedman who now reps Baldoni and has previously worked for Megyn Kelly and Perez Hilton.

Wallace is mentioned several times in the texts from Abel's phone, including in a text from Nathan reassuring Baldoni that Jamey Heath has spoken to Wallace to better understand the work he is doing for them.

Wallace, of course, is not in these texts because he only communicates via Signal. How many "regular people" do you know who only communicate via Signal?

I don't know if Wallace did anything worthy of liability in this case, but the idea he's just a regular fellow who has been unfairly dragged in by Blake is laughable. Or that she owes him 14 million, lol!

Defamation Plaintiffs always ask for a lot for reputational damage and pain and suffering etc. 14M is not at all shocking. It doesn’t mean he expects to get it, but it sets the parameters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wallace has filed his amended complaint. Makes Blake look really bad, like she’s punching down. The judge should grant his MTD, and if he doesn’t, Blake should settle out of court and pay him what he’s asking for (14 million) and cut her losses. I think it’s pretty clear she’s caused this guy a lot of trouble, and he’s really just a regular person who got paid for a job and had never met Blake or Justin and knew nothing of the supposed SH. It’s a bit ridiculous that she’s suing him.

What you’re saying is insane. He’s a regular guy who could… remotely have $14 million in real damages from reputational damage? She should just go ahead and pay this “regular guy” $14 million (i.e., more money than an actual regular person will come close to earning in their entire life)? This take really shows you’ve jumped the shark.

Thank you.

To the PP: Wallace's lawyers of course want to position him as a "regular guy" who isn't even involved and should be dismissed from the case.

In reality, Wallace has a history of calling himself a "fixer", promising the ability to sculpt online sentiment to his will, and engaging in unethical business tactics. He has previously been sued for administering some kind of drug addiction program that, the plaintiff argued, almost killed him. He was repped by Bryan Freedman in that case from several years ago, the same Bryan Freedman who now reps Baldoni and has previously worked for Megyn Kelly and Perez Hilton.

Wallace is mentioned several times in the texts from Abel's phone, including in a text from Nathan reassuring Baldoni that Jamey Heath has spoken to Wallace to better understand the work he is doing for them.

Wallace, of course, is not in these texts because he only communicates via Signal. How many "regular people" do you know who only communicate via Signal?

I don't know if Wallace did anything worthy of liability in this case, but the idea he's just a regular fellow who has been unfairly dragged in by Blake is laughable. Or that she owes him 14 million, lol!

Defamation Plaintiffs always ask for a lot for reputational damage and pain and suffering etc. 14M is not at all shocking. It doesn’t mean he expects to get it, but it sets the parameters.

That's fine but PP is suggesting that because Wallace's counter complaint paint him as an innocent nobody with no involvement whatsoever, Lively owes him 14 million, which makes no sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wallace has filed his amended complaint. Makes Blake look really bad, like she’s punching down. The judge should grant his MTD, and if he doesn’t, Blake should settle out of court and pay him what he’s asking for (14 million) and cut her losses. I think it’s pretty clear she’s caused this guy a lot of trouble, and he’s really just a regular person who got paid for a job and had never met Blake or Justin and knew nothing of the supposed SH. It’s a bit ridiculous that she’s suing him.

What you’re saying is insane. He’s a regular guy who could… remotely have $14 million in real damages from reputational damage? She should just go ahead and pay this “regular guy” $14 million (i.e., more money than an actual regular person will come close to earning in their entire life)? This take really shows you’ve jumped the shark.

Thank you.

To the PP: Wallace's lawyers of course want to position him as a "regular guy" who isn't even involved and should be dismissed from the case.

In reality, Wallace has a history of calling himself a "fixer", promising the ability to sculpt online sentiment to his will, and engaging in unethical business tactics. He has previously been sued for administering some kind of drug addiction program that, the plaintiff argued, almost killed him. He was repped by Bryan Freedman in that case from several years ago, the same Bryan Freedman who now reps Baldoni and has previously worked for Megyn Kelly and Perez Hilton.

Wallace is mentioned several times in the texts from Abel's phone, including in a text from Nathan reassuring Baldoni that Jamey Heath has spoken to Wallace to better understand the work he is doing for them.

Wallace, of course, is not in these texts because he only communicates via Signal. How many "regular people" do you know who only communicate via Signal?

I don't know if Wallace did anything worthy of liability in this case, but the idea he's just a regular fellow who has been unfairly dragged in by Blake is laughable. Or that she owes him 14 million, lol!

YES! The only people I have heard of being on Signal are Trump admin folks who are trying not to get caught. Who does that?!

Still unknown exactly who was paying Wallace, which also seems weird. He’s just a regular guy living in a two million dollar mansion in Austin who just makes little reports on social media but definitely doesn’t do anything except that and exclusively communicates on Signal. 👌

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wallace has filed his amended complaint. Makes Blake look really bad, like she’s punching down. The judge should grant his MTD, and if he doesn’t, Blake should settle out of court and pay him what he’s asking for (14 million) and cut her losses. I think it’s pretty clear she’s caused this guy a lot of trouble, and he’s really just a regular person who got paid for a job and had never met Blake or Justin and knew nothing of the supposed SH. It’s a bit ridiculous that she’s suing him.

What you’re saying is insane. He’s a regular guy who could… remotely have $14 million in real damages from reputational damage? She should just go ahead and pay this “regular guy” $14 million (i.e., more money than an actual regular person will come close to earning in their entire life)? This take really shows you’ve jumped the shark.

Thank you.

To the PP: Wallace's lawyers of course want to position him as a "regular guy" who isn't even involved and should be dismissed from the case.

In reality, Wallace has a history of calling himself a "fixer", promising the ability to sculpt online sentiment to his will, and engaging in unethical business tactics. He has previously been sued for administering some kind of drug addiction program that, the plaintiff argued, almost killed him. He was repped by Bryan Freedman in that case from several years ago, the same Bryan Freedman who now reps Baldoni and has previously worked for Megyn Kelly and Perez Hilton.

Wallace is mentioned several times in the texts from Abel's phone, including in a text from Nathan reassuring Baldoni that Jamey Heath has spoken to Wallace to better understand the work he is doing for them.

Wallace, of course, is not in these texts because he only communicates via Signal. How many "regular people" do you know who only communicate via Signal?

I don't know if Wallace did anything worthy of liability in this case, but the idea he's just a regular fellow who has been unfairly dragged in by Blake is laughable. Or that she owes him 14 million, lol!

So much of what you’ve written is irrelevant to the facts of the case and meant to distract. But since we’re talking about shady behavior, Blake hired Wallace’s own former lawyer who had represented him in another case. There needs to be an entire class of new laws called the lively laws to close all of the unethical loopholes she’s tapping into in this case. Can you imagine the privileged information this lawyer has and is now using against Wallace? Also, I’m not sure living in a 2m house makes you not a regular person. I’m quite sure lots of people on this very forum would disagree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The internalized misogyny on this thread is fascinating, and sad.

LOL, ah yes the feminist icon who *checks notes* is a pathological lying scam artist who ruins men's lives for sport. We should all rally behind her scheming narcissistic ass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wallace has filed his amended complaint. Makes Blake look really bad, like she’s punching down. The judge should grant his MTD, and if he doesn’t, Blake should settle out of court and pay him what he’s asking for (14 million) and cut her losses. I think it’s pretty clear she’s caused this guy a lot of trouble, and he’s really just a regular person who got paid for a job and had never met Blake or Justin and knew nothing of the supposed SH. It’s a bit ridiculous that she’s suing him.

What you’re saying is insane. He’s a regular guy who could… remotely have $14 million in real damages from reputational damage? She should just go ahead and pay this “regular guy” $14 million (i.e., more money than an actual regular person will come close to earning in their entire life)? This take really shows you’ve jumped the shark.

The "settle" Anon is the worst. They're not settling anytime soon and it most definitely won't be for 14 million dollars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wallace has filed his amended complaint. Makes Blake look really bad, like she’s punching down. The judge should grant his MTD, and if he doesn’t, Blake should settle out of court and pay him what he’s asking for (14 million) and cut her losses. I think it’s pretty clear she’s caused this guy a lot of trouble, and he’s really just a regular person who got paid for a job and had never met Blake or Justin and knew nothing of the supposed SH. It’s a bit ridiculous that she’s suing him.

What you’re saying is insane. He’s a regular guy who could… remotely have $14 million in real damages from reputational damage? She should just go ahead and pay this “regular guy” $14 million (i.e., more money than an actual regular person will come close to earning in their entire life)? This take really shows you’ve jumped the shark.

Thank you.

To the PP: Wallace's lawyers of course want to position him as a "regular guy" who isn't even involved and should be dismissed from the case.

In reality, Wallace has a history of calling himself a "fixer", promising the ability to sculpt online sentiment to his will, and engaging in unethical business tactics. He has previously been sued for administering some kind of drug addiction program that, the plaintiff argued, almost killed him. He was repped by Bryan Freedman in that case from several years ago, the same Bryan Freedman who now reps Baldoni and has previously worked for Megyn Kelly and Perez Hilton.

Wallace is mentioned several times in the texts from Abel's phone, including in a text from Nathan reassuring Baldoni that Jamey Heath has spoken to Wallace to better understand the work he is doing for them.

Wallace, of course, is not in these texts because he only communicates via Signal. How many "regular people" do you know who only communicate via Signal?

I don't know if Wallace did anything worthy of liability in this case, but the idea he's just a regular fellow who has been unfairly dragged in by Blake is laughable. Or that she owes him 14 million, lol!

So much of what you’ve written is irrelevant to the facts of the case and meant to distract. But since we’re talking about shady behavior, Blake hired Wallace’s own former lawyer who had represented him in another case. There needs to be an entire class of new laws called the lively laws to close all of the unethical loopholes she’s tapping into in this case. Can you imagine the privileged information this lawyer has and is now using against Wallace? Also, I’m not sure living in a 2m house makes you not a regular person. I’m quite sure lots of people on this very forum would disagree.

lol. This is a $2+M house in Austin, TX, where houses cost maybe half as much as in the DMV. So yeah totally regular person just “monitoring socials” and not doing anything else except communicating exclusively via signal in his $2+M house. Yup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wallace has filed his amended complaint. Makes Blake look really bad, like she’s punching down. The judge should grant his MTD, and if he doesn’t, Blake should settle out of court and pay him what he’s asking for (14 million) and cut her losses. I think it’s pretty clear she’s caused this guy a lot of trouble, and he’s really just a regular person who got paid for a job and had never met Blake or Justin and knew nothing of the supposed SH. It’s a bit ridiculous that she’s suing him.

What you’re saying is insane. He’s a regular guy who could… remotely have $14 million in real damages from reputational damage? She should just go ahead and pay this “regular guy” $14 million (i.e., more money than an actual regular person will come close to earning in their entire life)? This take really shows you’ve jumped the shark.

Thank you.

To the PP: Wallace's lawyers of course want to position him as a "regular guy" who isn't even involved and should be dismissed from the case.

In reality, Wallace has a history of calling himself a "fixer", promising the ability to sculpt online sentiment to his will, and engaging in unethical business tactics. He has previously been sued for administering some kind of drug addiction program that, the plaintiff argued, almost killed him. He was repped by Bryan Freedman in that case from several years ago, the same Bryan Freedman who now reps Baldoni and has previously worked for Megyn Kelly and Perez Hilton.

Wallace is mentioned several times in the texts from Abel's phone, including in a text from Nathan reassuring Baldoni that Jamey Heath has spoken to Wallace to better understand the work he is doing for them.

Wallace, of course, is not in these texts because he only communicates via Signal. How many "regular people" do you know who only communicate via Signal?

I don't know if Wallace did anything worthy of liability in this case, but the idea he's just a regular fellow who has been unfairly dragged in by Blake is laughable. Or that she owes him 14 million, lol!

So much of what you’ve written is irrelevant to the facts of the case and meant to distract. But since we’re talking about shady behavior, Blake hired Wallace’s own former lawyer who had represented him in another case. There needs to be an entire class of new laws called the lively laws to close all of the unethical loopholes she’s tapping into in this case. Can you imagine the privileged information this lawyer has and is now using against Wallace? Also, I’m not sure living in a 2m house makes you not a regular person. I’m quite sure lots of people on this very forum would disagree.

lol. This is a $2+M house in Austin, TX, where houses cost maybe half as much as in the DMV. So yeah totally regular person just “monitoring socials” and not doing anything else except communicating exclusively via signal in his $2+M house. Yup.

Austin is insanely expensive.

[Anonymous]

I was going off these google descriptions, where median home sale in Austin was $577K and in Arlington VA was $768K.

Austin TX:
In April 2025, the median sales price for homes in Austin, Texas was $577,151, up 1.5% year-over-year, reports Rocket Homes. The median price per square foot was $306, reports Rocket Homes. While the average home price in the US is $386,658, Austin's market is more expensive, with prices varying based on location and property type, says Zillow. For example, a $350,000 home in Austin could buy you a 1,100-square-foot home, according to a KVUE report.
Factors influencing Austin home prices:
Location:
Prices can vary significantly between neighborhoods. For instance, North Austin has an average home value of $386,658, while zip codes like 78756 can see home values reach $739,834.
Type of home:
Single-family homes, condos, and townhouses will have different price ranges.
Size and features:
Larger homes with more amenities will naturally command higher prices.
Market trends:
Austin's housing market has seen both booms and periods of stabilization, impacting prices.
Interest rates:
Interest rates play a significant role in affordability and overall prices.
Examples of specific home prices in Austin:
A 4-bedroom, 2-bathroom home in Austin might average around $369,509, says a Habitat Hunters report.
Some homes listed for sale include a $1,350,000 home (2 bedrooms, 1 bath), a $500,000 condo (1 bedroom, 1 bath), and an $825,000 home (4 bedrooms, 4 baths), according to Zillow.
Redfin reports that a 3-bedroom, 2-bathroom home in Austin recently sold for $399,999.

Arlington, VA:
The median sale price for a house in Arlington, VA is currently around $768,750. This is up 10.5% year-over-year. The average Arlington, VA home value is $839,154, and homes go pending in about 8 days.
Here's a more detailed look at the Arlington, VA housing market:
Median Sale Price:
$768,750: (as of February 2025)
$769K: (median sale price in February 2025)
$757K: (median listing home price in March 2025)
Average Home Value:
$839,154: (as of Zillow)
Home Prices by Neighborhood:
Ballston-Virginia Square: Zillow $542,217
Radnor-Ft Myer Heights: Zillow $572,401
Douglas Park: Zillow $724,315
Clarendon-Courthouse: Zillow $663,568
Bluemont: Zillow $1,112,656
Lyon Park: Zillow $1,199,719
Ashton Heights: Zillow $1,352,014
Penrose: Zillow $776,161
Lyon Village: Zillow $1,748,929
North Highland: Zillow $443,012
Cherrydale: Zillow $1,278,761
Barcroft: Zillow $958,287
Arlington Heights: Zillow $852,797
Waverly Hills: Zillow $857,845
Colonial Village: Zillow $366,166
Alcova Heights: Zillow $829,615
Arlington Forest: Zillow $1,064,273
Waycroft-Woodlawn: Zillow $1,228,229
Maywood: Zillow $1,132,598

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wallace has filed his amended complaint. Makes Blake look really bad, like she’s punching down. The judge should grant his MTD, and if he doesn’t, Blake should settle out of court and pay him what he’s asking for (14 million) and cut her losses. I think it’s pretty clear she’s caused this guy a lot of trouble, and he’s really just a regular person who got paid for a job and had never met Blake or Justin and knew nothing of the supposed SH. It’s a bit ridiculous that she’s suing him.

What you’re saying is insane. He’s a regular guy who could… remotely have $14 million in real damages from reputational damage? She should just go ahead and pay this “regular guy” $14 million (i.e., more money than an actual regular person will come close to earning in their entire life)? This take really shows you’ve jumped the shark.

Thank you.

To the PP: Wallace's lawyers of course want to position him as a "regular guy" who isn't even involved and should be dismissed from the case.

In reality, Wallace has a history of calling himself a "fixer", promising the ability to sculpt online sentiment to his will, and engaging in unethical business tactics. He has previously been sued for administering some kind of drug addiction program that, the plaintiff argued, almost killed him. He was repped by Bryan Freedman in that case from several years ago, the same Bryan Freedman who now reps Baldoni and has previously worked for Megyn Kelly and Perez Hilton.

Wallace is mentioned several times in the texts from Abel's phone, including in a text from Nathan reassuring Baldoni that Jamey Heath has spoken to Wallace to better understand the work he is doing for them.

Wallace, of course, is not in these texts because he only communicates via Signal. How many "regular people" do you know who only communicate via Signal?

I don't know if Wallace did anything worthy of liability in this case, but the idea he's just a regular fellow who has been unfairly dragged in by Blake is laughable. Or that she owes him 14 million, lol!

So much of what you’ve written is irrelevant to the facts of the case and meant to distract. But since we’re talking about shady behavior, Blake hired Wallace’s own former lawyer who had represented him in another case. There needs to be an entire class of new laws called the lively laws to close all of the unethical loopholes she’s tapping into in this case. Can you imagine the privileged information this lawyer has and is now using against Wallace? Also, I’m not sure living in a 2m house makes you not a regular person. I’m quite sure lots of people on this very forum would disagree.

If the lawyer is sharing privileged info about Wallace, he can be disbarred.

Did you know Bryan Freedman represented a screenwriter who was suing Wayfarer and Baldoni before he started representing them against Lively? Lawyers sometimes do that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wallace has filed his amended complaint. Makes Blake look really bad, like she’s punching down. The judge should grant his MTD, and if he doesn’t, Blake should settle out of court and pay him what he’s asking for (14 million) and cut her losses. I think it’s pretty clear she’s caused this guy a lot of trouble, and he’s really just a regular person who got paid for a job and had never met Blake or Justin and knew nothing of the supposed SH. It’s a bit ridiculous that she’s suing him.

What you’re saying is insane. He’s a regular guy who could… remotely have $14 million in real damages from reputational damage? She should just go ahead and pay this “regular guy” $14 million (i.e., more money than an actual regular person will come close to earning in their entire life)? This take really shows you’ve jumped the shark.

Thank you.

To the PP: Wallace's lawyers of course want to position him as a "regular guy" who isn't even involved and should be dismissed from the case.

In reality, Wallace has a history of calling himself a "fixer", promising the ability to sculpt online sentiment to his will, and engaging in unethical business tactics. He has previously been sued for administering some kind of drug addiction program that, the plaintiff argued, almost killed him. He was repped by Bryan Freedman in that case from several years ago, the same Bryan Freedman who now reps Baldoni and has previously worked for Megyn Kelly and Perez Hilton.

Wallace is mentioned several times in the texts from Abel's phone, including in a text from Nathan reassuring Baldoni that Jamey Heath has spoken to Wallace to better understand the work he is doing for them.

Wallace, of course, is not in these texts because he only communicates via Signal. How many "regular people" do you know who only communicate via Signal?

I don't know if Wallace did anything worthy of liability in this case, but the idea he's just a regular fellow who has been unfairly dragged in by Blake is laughable. Or that she owes him 14 million, lol!

So much of what you’ve written is irrelevant to the facts of the case and meant to distract. But since we’re talking about shady behavior, Blake hired Wallace’s own former lawyer who had represented him in another case. There needs to be an entire class of new laws called the lively laws to close all of the unethical loopholes she’s tapping into in this case. Can you imagine the privileged information this lawyer has and is now using against Wallace? Also, I’m not sure living in a 2m house makes you not a regular person. I’m quite sure lots of people on this very forum would disagree.

If the lawyer is sharing privileged info about Wallace, he can be disbarred.

Did you know Bryan Freedman represented a screenwriter who was suing Wayfarer and Baldoni before he started representing them against Lively? Lawyers sometimes do that.

The difference is lively hired this lawyer to sue Wallace. It’s just very weird. Blake and Ryan move in a very shady way. It’s like they see themselves as untouchable