Trump Campaign verbally and physically assaults Arlington Memorial staff, illegally uses site for campaigning

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this marine lied under oath?

Seems reasonable. So in this case, MAGA has the okay to believe the military, right? The MAGA playbook involves situationally believing the military depending on what's convenient in the moment.

So you believe this Marine is lying?

No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?

As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?

The rules not a single poster can list or link to?

Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules

You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)

Trump followed all the rules.

The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?

If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.

Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?

Was this ceremony disrespectful?

The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.

There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.

What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.

What? It is from his campaign to support his candidacy. That is the point of campaign material.

The material is not from his campaign. It was from the wreath laying ceremony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this marine lied under oath?

Seems reasonable. So in this case, MAGA has the okay to believe the military, right? The MAGA playbook involves situationally believing the military depending on what's convenient in the moment.

So you believe this Marine is lying?

No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?

As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?

The rules not a single poster can list or link to?

Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules

You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)

Trump followed all the rules.

The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?

If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.

Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?

Was this ceremony disrespectful?

The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.

There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.

What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.

He contrasted his administration with Biden/Harris. Harris is running for President.

But Biden isn’t running for president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dems should definitely continue attacking the military families of the Abbey Gate KIA’s who support Trump and invited him to the ceremony.

You’d have to be in DCUMland to think attacking Gold Star families would “get Trump.”

So many democrats on this thread attacking Gold Star families while claiming to be the good guys. 🙃

The families are fine. The families are grieving. Trump can't use section 60 in his campaign material.

And he didn’t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this marine lied under oath?

Seems reasonable. So in this case, MAGA has the okay to believe the military, right? The MAGA playbook involves situationally believing the military depending on what's convenient in the moment.

So you believe this Marine is lying?

No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?

As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?

The rules not a single poster can list or link to?

Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules

You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)

Trump followed all the rules.

The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?

If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.

Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?

Was this ceremony disrespectful?

The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.

There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.

What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.

What? It is from his campaign to support his candidacy. That is the point of campaign material.

The material is not from his campaign. It was from the wreath laying ceremony.

The wreath laying ceremony was used in a campaign ad. This isn't difficult.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this marine lied under oath?

Seems reasonable. So in this case, MAGA has the okay to believe the military, right? The MAGA playbook involves situationally believing the military depending on what's convenient in the moment.

So you believe this Marine is lying?

No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?

As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?

The rules not a single poster can list or link to?

Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules

You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)

Trump followed all the rules.

The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?

If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.

Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?

Was this ceremony disrespectful?

The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.

There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.

What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.

What? It is from his campaign to support his candidacy. That is the point of campaign material.

The material is not from his campaign. It was from the wreath laying ceremony.

Uggg. The tik tok ad on from his campaign. Ok. Not the ceremony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this marine lied under oath?

Seems reasonable. So in this case, MAGA has the okay to believe the military, right? The MAGA playbook involves situationally believing the military depending on what's convenient in the moment.

So you believe this Marine is lying?

No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?

As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?

The rules not a single poster can list or link to?

Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules

You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)

Trump followed all the rules.

The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?

If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.

Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?

Was this ceremony disrespectful?

The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.

There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.

What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.

He contrasted his administration with Biden/Harris. Harris is running for President.

But Biden isn’t running for president.

Ehhh, okay?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this marine lied under oath?

Seems reasonable. So in this case, MAGA has the okay to believe the military, right? The MAGA playbook involves situationally believing the military depending on what's convenient in the moment.

So you believe this Marine is lying?

No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?

As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?

The rules not a single poster can list or link to?

Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules

You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)

Trump followed all the rules.

The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?

If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.

Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?

Was this ceremony disrespectful?

The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.

There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.

What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.

What? It is from his campaign to support his candidacy. That is the point of campaign material.

The material is not from his campaign. It was from the wreath laying ceremony.

Uggg. The tik tok ad on from his campaign. Ok. Not the ceremony.

The tik tok has no campaign or election ads or verbiage or endorsements or signs or anything to do with the upcoming election. Biden was president during the Abbey Gate bombing. Harris was VP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dems should definitely continue attacking the military families of the Abbey Gate KIA’s who support Trump and invited him to the ceremony.

You’d have to be in DCUMland to think attacking Gold Star families would “get Trump.”

So many democrats on this thread attacking Gold Star families while claiming to be the good guys. 🙃

The families are fine. The families are grieving. Trump can't use section 60 in his campaign material.

And he didn’t.

He did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this marine lied under oath?

Seems reasonable. So in this case, MAGA has the okay to believe the military, right? The MAGA playbook involves situationally believing the military depending on what's convenient in the moment.

So you believe this Marine is lying?

No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?

As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?

The rules not a single poster can list or link to?

Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules

You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)

Trump followed all the rules.

The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?

If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.

Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?

Was this ceremony disrespectful?

The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.

There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.

What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.

What? It is from his campaign to support his candidacy. That is the point of campaign material.

The material is not from his campaign. It was from the wreath laying ceremony.

Uggg. The tik tok ad on from his campaign. Ok. Not the ceremony.

The tik tok has no campaign or election ads or verbiage or endorsements or signs or anything to do with the upcoming election. Biden was president during the Abbey Gate bombing. Harris was VP.

Take it up with the army and the cemetery. They have a different opinion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this marine lied under oath?

Seems reasonable. So in this case, MAGA has the okay to believe the military, right? The MAGA playbook involves situationally believing the military depending on what's convenient in the moment.

So you believe this Marine is lying?

No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?

As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?

The rules not a single poster can list or link to?

Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules

You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)

Trump followed all the rules.

The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?

If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.

Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?

Was this ceremony disrespectful?

The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.

There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.

What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.

What? It is from his campaign to support his candidacy. That is the point of campaign material.

The material is not from his campaign. It was from the wreath laying ceremony.

Uggg. The tik tok ad on from his campaign. Ok. Not the ceremony.

The tik tok has no campaign or election ads or verbiage or endorsements or signs or anything to do with the upcoming election. Biden was president during the Abbey Gate bombing. Harris was VP.

The campaign ad said "they". It compared his administration against their administration. But are you saying you don't hold Harris responsible? That's refreshing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this marine lied under oath?

Seems reasonable. So in this case, MAGA has the okay to believe the military, right? The MAGA playbook involves situationally believing the military depending on what's convenient in the moment.

So you believe this Marine is lying?

No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?

As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?

The rules not a single poster can list or link to?

Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules

You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)

Trump followed all the rules.

The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?

If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.

Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?

Was this ceremony disrespectful?

The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.

There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.

What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.

What? It is from his campaign to support his candidacy. That is the point of campaign material.

The material is not from his campaign. It was from the wreath laying ceremony.

Uggg. The tik tok ad on from his campaign. Ok. Not the ceremony.

The tik tok has no campaign or election ads or verbiage or endorsements or signs or anything to do with the upcoming election. Biden was president during the Abbey Gate bombing. Harris was VP.

The campaign ad said "they". It compared his administration against their administration. But are you saying you don't hold Harris responsible? That's refreshing.

So you are designating a tik tok with no mention of the upcoming election, no mention of the Trump campaign, no reminders to vote, no mention of anything to do with either the campaign or election, a “campaign ad?”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this marine lied under oath?

Seems reasonable. So in this case, MAGA has the okay to believe the military, right? The MAGA playbook involves situationally believing the military depending on what's convenient in the moment.

So you believe this Marine is lying?

No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?

As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?

The rules not a single poster can list or link to?

Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules

You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)

Trump followed all the rules.

The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?

If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.

Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?

Was this ceremony disrespectful?

The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.

There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.

What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.

What? It is from his campaign to support his candidacy. That is the point of campaign material.

The material is not from his campaign. It was from the wreath laying ceremony.

Uggg. The tik tok ad on from his campaign. Ok. Not the ceremony.

The tik tok has no campaign or election ads or verbiage or endorsements or signs or anything to do with the upcoming election. Biden was president during the Abbey Gate bombing. Harris was VP.

The campaign ad said "they". It compared his administration against their administration. But are you saying you don't hold Harris responsible? That's refreshing.

So you are designating a tik tok with no mention of the upcoming election, no mention of the Trump campaign, no reminders to vote, no mention of anything to do with either the campaign or election, a “campaign ad?”

Yes, it's clearly a political ad. Are you that simple-minded that things always have to be spelled out for you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this marine lied under oath?

Seems reasonable. So in this case, MAGA has the okay to believe the military, right? The MAGA playbook involves situationally believing the military depending on what's convenient in the moment.

So you believe this Marine is lying?

No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?

As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?

The rules not a single poster can list or link to?

Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules

You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)

Trump followed all the rules.

The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?

If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.

Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?

Was this ceremony disrespectful?

The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.

There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.

What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.

What? It is from his campaign to support his candidacy. That is the point of campaign material.

The material is not from his campaign. It was from the wreath laying ceremony.

Uggg. The tik tok ad on from his campaign. Ok. Not the ceremony.

The tik tok has no campaign or election ads or verbiage or endorsements or signs or anything to do with the upcoming election. Biden was president during the Abbey Gate bombing. Harris was VP.

The campaign ad said "they". It compared his administration against their administration. But are you saying you don't hold Harris responsible? That's refreshing.

The Gold Star Families who posted online hold Biden and Harris accountable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this marine lied under oath?

Seems reasonable. So in this case, MAGA has the okay to believe the military, right? The MAGA playbook involves situationally believing the military depending on what's convenient in the moment.

So you believe this Marine is lying?

No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?

As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?

The rules not a single poster can list or link to?

Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules

You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)

Trump followed all the rules.

The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?

If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.

Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?

Was this ceremony disrespectful?

The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.

There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.

What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.

What? It is from his campaign to support his candidacy. That is the point of campaign material.

The material is not from his campaign. It was from the wreath laying ceremony.

Uggg. The tik tok ad on from his campaign. Ok. Not the ceremony.

The tik tok has no campaign or election ads or verbiage or endorsements or signs or anything to do with the upcoming election. Biden was president during the Abbey Gate bombing. Harris was VP.

The campaign ad said "they". It compared his administration against their administration. But are you saying you don't hold Harris responsible? That's refreshing.

So you are designating a tik tok with no mention of the upcoming election, no mention of the Trump campaign, no reminders to vote, no mention of anything to do with either the campaign or election, a “campaign ad?”

It is from the trump campaign. Yes it is. Take it up with Arlington national cemetery if you object.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this marine lied under oath?

Seems reasonable. So in this case, MAGA has the okay to believe the military, right? The MAGA playbook involves situationally believing the military depending on what's convenient in the moment.

So you believe this Marine is lying?

No, I have no reason to believe he's lying. That's what I clarified in the post directly below. Is this a case where you choosing to believe the military? Is it more convenient to the narrative this time?

As opposed to the military saying that the campaign violated the rules of section 60?

The rules not a single poster can list or link to?

Ooh ooh, I CAN!!!!

https://www.axios.com/2024/08/29/trump-arlington-national-cemetery-rules

You are so welcome. (I hope you are able to read.)

Trump followed all the rules.

The ANC says he did not. I believe them. Especially over a proven liar. Why do you disrespect our beloved national cemetery?

If you think I am disrespecting our beloved national cemetery, I can definitely say you are not discussing this issue in good faith. You are accusing everyone who doesn’t agree with you of disrespecting Arlington.

Do you think the Gold Star Families are disrespecting Arlington as well, by holding a wreath laying ceremony and visiting the graves of their sons and daughters with the man who they invited to lay the wreath?

Was this ceremony disrespectful?

The act of using it as a political ad on TikTok was disrespectful if that's what you're asking.

There was no campaign or election signs, slogans, etc, no exhortations to vote, etc.

What made the tik tok a political ad? Be specific.

What? It is from his campaign to support his candidacy. That is the point of campaign material.

The material is not from his campaign. It was from the wreath laying ceremony.

Uggg. The tik tok ad on from his campaign. Ok. Not the ceremony.

The tik tok has no campaign or election ads or verbiage or endorsements or signs or anything to do with the upcoming election. Biden was president during the Abbey Gate bombing. Harris was VP.

The campaign ad said "they". It compared his administration against their administration. But are you saying you don't hold Harris responsible? That's refreshing.

The Gold Star Families who posted online hold Biden and Harris accountable.

So...what's your point? The "they" refers to Harris in the political ad now?