Hillary and the pre-debate questions

[Anonymous]

Remember when everyone was upset that Hillary was told that there would be a question about the drinking water when there was a presidential debate in Flint, Michigan?

Ya, me to. Well guess what...

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/03/11/the-making-of-the-fox-news-white-house

[Anonymous]

This is a total indictment of Fox News as an actual propaganda arm of the administration.

[Anonymous]

Fox “News” = state propaganda.

[Anonymous]

Putin=>Wendi Deng=> Ivanka
Murdoch=> Wendi Deng=>Jared Kushner

I am seeing a pattern.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Putin=>Wendi Deng=> Ivanka
Murdoch=> Wendi Deng=>Jared Kushner

I am seeing a pattern.

More on Deng from 2 years ago

https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/291465-ivanka-trump-vacationing-with-putins-rumored-girlfriend

Is anyone investigating this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Putin=>Wendi Deng=> Ivanka
Murdoch=> Wendi Deng=>Jared Kushner

I am seeing a pattern.

More on Deng from 2 years ago

https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/291465-ivanka-trump-vacationing-with-putins-rumored-girlfriend

Is anyone investigating this?

I imagine that vacationing with Wendi Deng was one of the issues that kept Jared ‘n’ Ivanka from getting security clearances in the normal manner, so I hope so.

[Anonymous]

Roger Ailes gives Trump debate questions in advance.

Fox editor buries Stormy Daniels story in 2016 that would've hurt Trump in the general, uses a nondisclosure as a shield to stop the reporter. T

his should should disqualify Fox News from hosting 2019-2020 debates.

[Anonymous]

The key point of that article is this quote: “Fox is no longer conservative—it’s anti-democratic.”

I have no idea of the way out, but it is fundamentally un-American for an entertainment company to be setting policy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Roger Ailes gives Trump debate questions in advance.

Fox editor buries Stormy Daniels story in 2016 that would've hurt Trump in the general, uses a nondisclosure as a shield to stop the reporter. T

his should should disqualify Fox News from hosting 2019-2020 debates.

Fox should be gently dismantled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The key point of that article is this quote: “Fox is no longer conservative—it’s anti-democratic.”

I have no idea of the way out, but it is fundamentally un-American for an entertainment company to be setting policy.

NBC, CBS, and ABC have been doing this for years and years. Get real.

Think of all the Clinton stories they squashed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The key point of that article is this quote: “Fox is no longer conservative—it’s anti-democratic.”

I have no idea of the way out, but it is fundamentally un-American for an entertainment company to be setting policy.

NBC, CBS, and ABC have been doing this for years and years. Get real.

Think of all the Clinton stories they squashed.

Like what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The key point of that article is this quote: “Fox is no longer conservative—it’s anti-democratic.”

I have no idea of the way out, but it is fundamentally un-American for an entertainment company to be setting policy.

NBC, CBS, and ABC have been doing this for years and years. Get real.

Think of all the Clinton stories they squashed.

People are historically ignorant.

Starting back at the time of the founding, the media was generally oriented towards one party or the other, and carried water for them too. It was with the advent of TV that the media pretended to be unbiased one way or the other.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The key point of that article is this quote: “Fox is no longer conservative—it’s anti-democratic.”

I have no idea of the way out, but it is fundamentally un-American for an entertainment company to be setting policy.

NBC, CBS, and ABC have been doing this for years and years. Get real.

Think of all the Clinton stories they squashed.

If you’re going to try to comment, read the article first.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The key point of that article is this quote: “Fox is no longer conservative—it’s anti-democratic.”

I have no idea of the way out, but it is fundamentally un-American for an entertainment company to be setting policy.

NBC, CBS, and ABC have been doing this for years and years. Get real.

Think of all the Clinton stories they squashed.

People are historically ignorant.

Starting back at the time of the founding, the media was generally oriented towards one party or the other, and carried water for them too. It was with the advent of TV that the media pretended to be unbiased one way or the other.

Uh, Fairness Doctrine?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The key point of that article is this quote: “Fox is no longer conservative—it’s anti-democratic.”

I have no idea of the way out, but it is fundamentally un-American for an entertainment company to be setting policy.

NBC, CBS, and ABC have been doing this for years and years. Get real.

Think of all the Clinton stories they squashed.

People are historically ignorant.

Starting back at the time of the founding, the media was generally oriented towards one party or the other, and carried water for them too. It was with the advent of TV that the media pretended to be unbiased one way or the other.

Newspapers, but broadcast media was subject to different rules, and until Reagan dismantled it, the Fairness Doctrine and SDC guidelines left rails on journalists to have an air of impartiality. But are you trying to suggest that Walter Cronkite fed questions to Jimmy Carter? Or that Roone Arledge talked to Clinton on a nightly basis to affect hires and policy?