Hillary and the pre-debate questions

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I always thought trump was redy for lil megs question about women. His timing was too spot on and it usually is not. It was a way to difuse his issues with women.

IIRC, in her book she originally stated that Donnie had in fact received the questions ahead of time.

Correct. There’s further sourcing on this in Mayer’s article.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You mean to tell me Fox KNEW our President of the United States wasn't a saint and no one told us?

Dude, Voters knew he wasn't close to a saint and STILL voted for him instead over HRC.

This is another political equivalent of watching a kitten play with a fluffy ball of yard for Trump haters.

No, Fox buried the truth. Fox is setting policy half the time. Fox uses gutter sources from conspiracy theorists.

Yup, particularly Kim Guilfoyle who’s now dating Junior. She was pushed out after a sexual harassment scandal of her own, and had been using a know-nothing who posted crap on Gab (Twitter for alt-righters banned from Twitter) as her “source” for a lot of stories.

[Anonymous]

Roger Ailes gives Trump debate questions in advance.

Does anyone remember that debate? Megyn Kelly's question? I don't think he knew the questions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Roger Ailes gives Trump debate questions in advance.

Does anyone remember that debate? Megyn Kelly's question? I don't think he knew the questions.

He had the “only Rosie O’Donnell” retort at the ready.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Fox “News” = state propaganda.

Yep, it reads like the People's Daily in China and Pravda in the Soviet.

[Anonymous]

This is a big nothing burger!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Roger Ailes gives Trump debate questions in advance.

Fox editor buries Stormy Daniels story in 2016 that would've hurt Trump in the general, uses a nondisclosure as a shield to stop the reporter. T

his should should disqualify Fox News from hosting 2019-2020 debates.

I just listened to the whole article and am in total agreement.

Couple of other nuggets - Bill Shine is receiving millions from fox while in the White House, giant sale of Fox assets to Disney had smooth sailing despite legitimate monopoly concerns while AT&T/Time Warner and Sinclair/Tribune mergers hit snags. And Sean Hannity is the de facto chief of staff. And the sexual harassment issues at Fox were even worse than you imagined.

Worse than at NPR, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, but not al-Jazeera?

[Anonymous]

Tom Perez has told Fox they are not allowed to participate in the debates this cycle.

smh.

Watch out for that boomerang.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tom Perez has told Fox they are not allowed to participate in the debates this cycle.

smh.

Watch out for that boomerang.

Yes, because Fox Propaganda Network has been such a good citizen. This will make them turn mean.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Roger Ailes gives Trump debate questions in advance.

Fox editor buries Stormy Daniels story in 2016 that would've hurt Trump in the general, uses a nondisclosure as a shield to stop the reporter. T

his should should disqualify Fox News from hosting 2019-2020 debates.

I just listened to the whole article and am in total agreement.

Couple of other nuggets - Bill Shine is receiving millions from fox while in the White House, giant sale of Fox assets to Disney had smooth sailing despite legitimate monopoly concerns while AT&T/Time Warner and Sinclair/Tribune mergers hit snags. And Sean Hannity is the de facto chief of staff. And the sexual harassment issues at Fox were even worse than you imagined.

Worse than at NPR, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, but not al-Jazeera?

What?

[Anonymous]

The article notes that Fox "is the most watched cable news network and generates about $2.7 billion a year for its parent company, 21st Century Fox." How is that possible if it's "faux" news and only "low information voters" watch it? (per DCUM posters).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The article notes that Fox "is the most watched cable news network and generates about $2.7 billion a year for its parent company, 21st Century Fox." How is that possible if it's "faux" news and only "low information voters" watch it? (per DCUM posters).

The Marvel movies make a ton of money for Disney. It doesn’t make them factual.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The article notes that Fox "is the most watched cable news network and generates about $2.7 billion a year for its parent company, 21st Century Fox." How is that possible if it's "faux" news and only "low information voters" watch it? (per DCUM posters).

The Marvel movies make a ton of money for Disney. It doesn’t make them factual.

You didn't answer the question. If 3 million more voters voted for HRC, your response doesn't explain what's bolded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The article notes that Fox "is the most watched cable news network and generates about $2.7 billion a year for its parent company, 21st Century Fox." How is that possible if it's "faux" news and only "low information voters" watch it? (per DCUM posters).

The Marvel movies make a ton of money for Disney. It doesn’t make them factual.

You didn't answer the question. If 3 million more voters voted for HRC, your response doesn't explain what's bolded.

Your question and this extra piece of word salad don’t make any sense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tom Perez has told Fox they are not allowed to participate in the debates this cycle.

smh.

Watch out for that boomerang.

Yes, because Fox Propaganda Network has been such a good citizen. This will make them turn mean.

I could ask myself the same of the intentions of others who thwart the First Amendment of American citizens. However, it doesn't help bring light into the cave since "Democracy Dies In The Darkness."