The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm the X poster and haven't been here in awhile. There's another one of me too. So forgive if this has been posted.

Usha looks appropriately and respectfully dressed. And her bump is starting to show!

To receive soldiers’ bodies, couldn’t Melania lay off the Manolos for just a bit?

Eh, that's just what she wears. If there were a lot of pictures of her wearing other shoes, I would think differently. But this is what's in her wardrobe, so it makes sense it's what she wears.

You could question boots vs pumps, but overall this seems reasonable.

+1
They both look very nice and completely appropriate.

. It’s the leather boots. I would never wear something like that to such a solemn event. It is trashy.

Same. There's a poster here who gets so angry when any of their looks are criticized and speaks in objective, absolutist terms - "They both look completely nice and appropriate!!!!" - but people are allowed to dissent and personally I think thigh high leather boots at a solemn event is trashy as well.

There’s a poster here who speaks in absolutist terms whenever anyone dares to say something positive about any of these women. “Nope. She looks terrible and disgusting and inappropriate and that’s final.” So let’s not forget about that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Bettina and EriKKKa both just look so MANLY.

Square jawlines

I think Bettina is pretty. Erika is a little butch tbh.

Nope, Creepy, creepy and haggard. Whatever about Usha, but the rest of the GOP women are creepy. Creepy and pretty are mutually exclusive.

They need to stop messing with their faces. Evolving into a strange male alien from Star Trek is NOT attractive.

Case in point ^^

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm the X poster and haven't been here in awhile. There's another one of me too. So forgive if this has been posted.

Usha looks appropriately and respectfully dressed. And her bump is starting to show!

To receive soldiers’ bodies, couldn’t Melania lay off the Manolos for just a bit?

Eh, that's just what she wears. If there were a lot of pictures of her wearing other shoes, I would think differently. But this is what's in her wardrobe, so it makes sense it's what she wears.

You could question boots vs pumps, but overall this seems reasonable.

+1
They both look very nice and completely appropriate.

. It’s the leather boots. I would never wear something like that to such a solemn event. It is trashy.

Same. There's a poster here who gets so angry when any of their looks are criticized and speaks in objective, absolutist terms - "They both look completely nice and appropriate!!!!" - but people are allowed to dissent and personally I think thigh high leather boots at a solemn event is trashy as well.

Are they thigh high? They look like regular knee boots.

They are classic regular leather boots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm the X poster and haven't been here in awhile. There's another one of me too. So forgive if this has been posted.

Usha looks appropriately and respectfully dressed. And her bump is starting to show!

To receive soldiers’ bodies, couldn’t Melania lay off the Manolos for just a bit?

Eh, that's just what she wears. If there were a lot of pictures of her wearing other shoes, I would think differently. But this is what's in her wardrobe, so it makes sense it's what she wears.

You could question boots vs pumps, but overall this seems reasonable.

+1
They both look very nice and completely appropriate.

. It’s the leather boots. I would never wear something like that to such a solemn event. It is trashy.

Same. There's a poster here who gets so angry when any of their looks are criticized and speaks in objective, absolutist terms - "They both look completely nice and appropriate!!!!" - but people are allowed to dissent and personally I think thigh high leather boots at a solemn event is trashy as well.

There’s a poster here who speaks in absolutist terms whenever anyone dares to say something positive about any of these women. “Nope. She looks terrible and disgusting and inappropriate and that’s final.” So let’s not forget about that.

And they're allowed to have those opinions! Hope this helps!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm the X poster and haven't been here in awhile. There's another one of me too. So forgive if this has been posted.

Usha looks appropriately and respectfully dressed. And her bump is starting to show!

To receive soldiers’ bodies, couldn’t Melania lay off the Manolos for just a bit?

Eh, that's just what she wears. If there were a lot of pictures of her wearing other shoes, I would think differently. But this is what's in her wardrobe, so it makes sense it's what she wears.

You could question boots vs pumps, but overall this seems reasonable.

+1
They both look very nice and completely appropriate.

. It’s the leather boots. I would never wear something like that to such a solemn event. It is trashy.

Same. There's a poster here who gets so angry when any of their looks are criticized and speaks in objective, absolutist terms - "They both look completely nice and appropriate!!!!" - but people are allowed to dissent and personally I think thigh high leather boots at a solemn event is trashy as well.

Are they thigh high? They look like regular knee boots.

They are classic regular leather boots.

+1
Whose the weirdo claiming she was wearing “thigh high” boots?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm the X poster and haven't been here in awhile. There's another one of me too. So forgive if this has been posted.

Usha looks appropriately and respectfully dressed. And her bump is starting to show!

To receive soldiers’ bodies, couldn’t Melania lay off the Manolos for just a bit?

Eh, that's just what she wears. If there were a lot of pictures of her wearing other shoes, I would think differently. But this is what's in her wardrobe, so it makes sense it's what she wears.

You could question boots vs pumps, but overall this seems reasonable.

+1
They both look very nice and completely appropriate.

. It’s the leather boots. I would never wear something like that to such a solemn event. It is trashy.

Same. There's a poster here who gets so angry when any of their looks are criticized and speaks in objective, absolutist terms - "They both look completely nice and appropriate!!!!" - but people are allowed to dissent and personally I think thigh high leather boots at a solemn event is trashy as well.

Are they thigh high? They look like regular knee boots.

They are classic regular leather boots.

+1
Whose the weirdo claiming she was wearing “thigh high” boots?

*who’s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm the X poster and haven't been here in awhile. There's another one of me too. So forgive if this has been posted.

Usha looks appropriately and respectfully dressed. And her bump is starting to show!

To receive soldiers’ bodies, couldn’t Melania lay off the Manolos for just a bit?

Eh, that's just what she wears. If there were a lot of pictures of her wearing other shoes, I would think differently. But this is what's in her wardrobe, so it makes sense it's what she wears.

You could question boots vs pumps, but overall this seems reasonable.

+1
They both look very nice and completely appropriate.

. It’s the leather boots. I would never wear something like that to such a solemn event. It is trashy.

Same. There's a poster here who gets so angry when any of their looks are criticized and speaks in objective, absolutist terms - "They both look completely nice and appropriate!!!!" - but people are allowed to dissent and personally I think thigh high leather boots at a solemn event is trashy as well.

There’s a poster here who speaks in absolutist terms whenever anyone dares to say something positive about any of these women. “Nope. She looks terrible and disgusting and inappropriate and that’s final.” So let’s not forget about that.

And they're allowed to have those opinions! Hope this helps!

Sure - as are those posters who make positive comments. Hope this helps!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm the X poster and haven't been here in awhile. There's another one of me too. So forgive if this has been posted.

Usha looks appropriately and respectfully dressed. And her bump is starting to show!

To receive soldiers’ bodies, couldn’t Melania lay off the Manolos for just a bit?

Eh, that's just what she wears. If there were a lot of pictures of her wearing other shoes, I would think differently. But this is what's in her wardrobe, so it makes sense it's what she wears.

You could question boots vs pumps, but overall this seems reasonable.

+1
They both look very nice and completely appropriate.

. It’s the leather boots. I would never wear something like that to such a solemn event. It is trashy.

Same. There's a poster here who gets so angry when any of their looks are criticized and speaks in objective, absolutist terms - "They both look completely nice and appropriate!!!!" - but people are allowed to dissent and personally I think thigh high leather boots at a solemn event is trashy as well.

There’s a poster here who speaks in absolutist terms whenever anyone dares to say something positive about any of these women. “Nope. She looks terrible and disgusting and inappropriate and that’s final.” So let’s not forget about that.

And they're allowed to have those opinions! Hope this helps!

Sure - as are those posters who make positive comments. Hope this helps!

Np Lol. Can't even come up with an individual response to a post that disagrees with you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm the X poster and haven't been here in awhile. There's another one of me too. So forgive if this has been posted.

Usha looks appropriately and respectfully dressed. And her bump is starting to show!

To receive soldiers’ bodies, couldn’t Melania lay off the Manolos for just a bit?

Eh, that's just what she wears. If there were a lot of pictures of her wearing other shoes, I would think differently. But this is what's in her wardrobe, so it makes sense it's what she wears.

You could question boots vs pumps, but overall this seems reasonable.

+1
They both look very nice and completely appropriate.

. It’s the leather boots. I would never wear something like that to such a solemn event. It is trashy.

Same. There's a poster here who gets so angry when any of their looks are criticized and speaks in objective, absolutist terms - "They both look completely nice and appropriate!!!!" - but people are allowed to dissent and personally I think thigh high leather boots at a solemn event is trashy as well.

There’s a poster here who speaks in absolutist terms whenever anyone dares to say something positive about any of these women. “Nope. She looks terrible and disgusting and inappropriate and that’s final.” So let’s not forget about that.

And they're allowed to have those opinions! Hope this helps!

Sure - as are those posters who make positive comments. Hope this helps!

Omg nobody cares that you like the outfit. *I* like the outfit. It's that you come on here accusing anyone who doesn't like it of being a radical leftist and then attempt to start multiple irrelevant threads and then go cry about political persecution in the Board Feedback subforum, you weirdo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm the X poster and haven't been here in awhile. There's another one of me too. So forgive if this has been posted.

Usha looks appropriately and respectfully dressed. And her bump is starting to show!

To receive soldiers’ bodies, couldn’t Melania lay off the Manolos for just a bit?

Eh, that's just what she wears. If there were a lot of pictures of her wearing other shoes, I would think differently. But this is what's in her wardrobe, so it makes sense it's what she wears.

You could question boots vs pumps, but overall this seems reasonable.

+1
They both look very nice and completely appropriate.

. It’s the leather boots. I would never wear something like that to such a solemn event. It is trashy.

Same. There's a poster here who gets so angry when any of their looks are criticized and speaks in objective, absolutist terms - "They both look completely nice and appropriate!!!!" - but people are allowed to dissent and personally I think thigh high leather boots at a solemn event is trashy as well.

There’s a poster here who speaks in absolutist terms whenever anyone dares to say something positive about any of these women. “Nope. She looks terrible and disgusting and inappropriate and that’s final.” So let’s not forget about that.

And they're allowed to have those opinions! Hope this helps!

Sure - as are those posters who make positive comments. Hope this helps!

Omg nobody cares that you like the outfit. *I* like the outfit. It's that you come on here accusing anyone who doesn't like it of being a radical leftist and then attempt to start multiple irrelevant threads and then go cry about political persecution in the Board Feedback subforum, you weirdo.

WTAF are you blathering about? I haven't done any of the things you claim. Which "multiple irrelevant threads" are you referring to? Which thread in Website Feedback? Do tell, psycho.

[Anonymous]

tradwife!

The monogrammed aprons are a bit much--even without the dollar sign monogram. What's up there?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

tradwife!

The monogrammed aprons are a bit much--even without the dollar sign monogram. What's up there?

WTAF?!

I love these people, and I hate them. Mostly I just think, "How is this reality?"

[Anonymous]

What do you love about them? It just looks crazy and sad to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

tradwife!

The monogrammed aprons are a bit much--even without the dollar sign monogram. What's up there?

WTAF?!

I love these people, and I hate them. Mostly I just think, "How is this reality?"

Are they showing off the French toast they made? Are they showing they are not jail worthy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What do you love about them? It just looks crazy and sad to me.

Because their whackadoodleness is at least entertaining. I'll take what I can get living in this most dystopic of timelines.