| I think Van Hollen is up in 2022, go after his seat and pick him off. I would love to see a Senator Hogan! |
| Not a snowballs chance in hell he’d win. None. Zero. |
| he has a good shot. |
No, he doesn’t. He has zero shot. |
+1. I'd vote for him, but I don't think he would have a remote chance, unfortunately. |
|
why do you think he doesnt have a good chance? he is a very popular governor. I would vote for him
|
Van Hollen is popular, unlike his other opponents. And more importantly, with a vote in the Senate at stake, many moderate Dems who supported him for Governor wouldn't support him this time around. |
| I agree. Voted for Hogan for Governor and would consider him for President. Not for Senate. But maybe State Senate or State House. |
Because dems hate him. Even the ones who vote for him. They’ll do it on a state level, and it remains their dirty little shameful secret that no one needs to know about. But if gets put in a national office, the dems in the rest of the country will know MD dems voted for a republican. And that CANNOT be abided. |
This is the reason. I'm not sure what it would take for me to vote for a GOP Senator. And I voted for Hogan for Governor. |
I don't hate Hogan - he's been a decent governor. But I will not cast a vote that supports the GOP retaining control of the Senate. Has absolutely nothing to do with Hogan personally. |
+1 State elections are one thing but no way I'd vote to tip the senate to the GOP. |
+2. A vote for Hogan for Senate is a vote for Mitch McConnell. Maryland is not going to do that. Just ask Connie Morella, who finally lost to Van Hollen after a vote for her became a vote for Gingrich. |
Newt Gingrich resigned from Congress in January 1999. Chris beat Connie nearly 4 years later in November 1992. He won because Maryland Democrats re-drew the 8th Congressional district into a funny-looking shape that was much more heavily Democratic than the district from the previous decade. |
*2002, not 1992. |