The excerpt starts in without context. The Special Counsel was asking Biden about his recollection of working with specific documents and files. If an average person were asked something like "do you remember working with the Peterson file, was that the same time that your father died?" considering that the person being asked probably worked with dozens and dozens of files that year, several years back, they'd be in the same boat |
Bing bing bing bing! |
It doesn't. |
| The case is simple. Classified doc found in Biden residence from the time before he was President. Nothing else matters. |
They will not. Biden is absolved, though. Garland looks like a bigger pile of doo doo than before, but Biden is absolved. |
I’m sure you have the same level of standard for Trump. “Wull, no, see that’s different becuz he wuz prezident and that means you can do anything you want.” |
We already knew that Biden has absolutely no business serving another four year term. This is old news. The conundrum we face revolves around Trump not having any business serving a second term either yet we can't escape the fact that somehow, someway these are the likely two major party nominees in the 2024 election. America will be in a compromising position until at least 2029. It is what it is. |
Except the documents found in his possession were his own notes, not marked files. |
Nope. Trump is the one with financial obligations that make him ripe as a national security risk. See how Russia bonded his E Jean Carroll debt. They will do the same with the NY State fines. Biden has no such issues. He is old. Yes, yes he is. But he cares about our country and there is no whiff of his being a national security risk. |
Not true. Hur just testified that there were documents marked as "classified" dating back to when Biden was a Senator. |
Not it is not difficult to believe. And those of us who have lost loved ones and talk about them and their deaths constantly but need some minutes to recall the the exact timing of when they died know it is not difficult. Maybe you should read the entire transcript and then you will not be worried about what he can and can't recall. Because you'll see how much he remembers about such things you are "worrying" about. Pretty amazing if you ask me. But I bet you won't read it all because you just want to score a point that you are so superior for remembering the exact dates of your parents' deaths. If I were cruel I'd say maybe that points to your lack of deep grief over their losses, since grief can really mess with one's memory (as those of us who have experienced it deeply can attest). But I am not Trump or a MAGA, so I don't make that accusation because I am not mean-spirited. I do know that mourning comes in all sorts of forms and it is absolutely not strange that someone who has suffered the unfathomable loss of a child might in an atmosphere of being grilled hesitate about the exact year of the death even though he remembered the exact date. For me, I can remember the years of my terrible losses but I couldn't tell you the exact days of the month or even the day of the week it was. And I have a phenomenal memory. I give others grace when it comes to loss. Maybe you should try it some time. It'll make you feel like a better human being. |
| Amazing people can read the transcripts and watch this hearing and not understand how in the tank Hur was on his report. The guy helped Rod Rosenstein "land the plan" on covering up the Mueller Report. Partisan hackery at its finest. |