Little pink monster blog

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^whoever you are, you really want us to know that she went to rehab. Regardless if it’s true, we get it. You want EVERYONE to know you think Natasha has a problem and went to court order rehab and is now clean. Completely unconfirmed at this point, but we here you.

Do you now feel validated?

Do you?

Why is it that you want to gloss over her past but make sure everyone knows Kane’s?

You seem to be totally brushing off an unbelievable invasion of privacy on his part while highlighting a negative thing about her. To me that says you are somehow on team Kane, because I, unconnected to both of them, see how both of them have issues but cannot imagine brushing such a psycho thing under the rug. If her account is true that is totally over the line insane.

Addiction is a disease. Hers (if true) was treated in a center after which she found a new partner, got married and had a healthy baby and has secured shared custody of her children. No 'disease' makes you spy on your wife via a home security system and then bring police over to intimidate her in front of your kids. Addiction is a serious thing, hers seems to be treated and under control. Sociopathic tendencies cannot be cured. So if I was picking one of these two flaws to talk about how its relevant to who they are and how they're acting today I would say what he did is much more relevant to today than what she did.

Not brushing anything off. Genuinely curious why you believe her? What actual proof do you have that all her claims are true? You clearly don’t believe his so why do you believe hers?

I think if she was lying he would have sued her by now. That is a big accusation and there haven't even been any Kane sympathizers on here denying that it happened.

I am curious why you believe him? What proof do you have that all of his claims are true? I believe that (if there is court decision evidence) if she had to go to rehab than she had a problem. I also believe that he has a big problem with women based on his long history with female cohosts and his decision to put his wife's personal problems on blast on his radio program.

So what information do we know fairly confidently?

1) Natasha at one point went to a court ordered rehab (I'm kind of taking your word on this that there is court evidence).
2) Kane has had numerous female cohosts quit or be pushed out due to conflicts with him
3) Natasha won back partial custody of the kids and is remarried with a new baby
4) No one on team Kane has denied her recent accusations
5) Previously cited former female cohosts have seemed sympathetic to Natasha.
6) Kane was at one point arrested for some type of domestic incident with Natasha.
7) Both have made questionable choices about the amount of information they share with the public regarding their relationship. IN MY OPINION, when he has done this it has been to humiliate her and when she has done this it has been in an effort to gain access to her children

What has been accused with no corroboration?

1) The crashing her car and parking it in the front yard accusation
2) The taking the kids and emptying the bank account and splitting to Florida accusation (by Kane of Natasha)
3) The extreme drug addiction to pain pills (I think personally there is a difference between someone with a chronic pain condition who needs to get treatment after being perscribed opioids and developing an issue and for example, someone hunting down oxy on the street to score)
4) Kane logged into security systems to spy on her when she was alone post separation

To me that shows a clearly dysfunctional relationship with two people that have a lot of fault. I also think there is a pattern of Kane treating women poorly. I think there is a pattern of Kane acting like women who clashed with him are 'crazy'. I think that Natasha appears to have changed a bit since 2015 or whatever. She's in a new stable marriage and has no problems maintaining custody of her son. Kane has not been in a stable relationship (not bad on it's own) and has continued to go through female cohosts (Mel). One seems to have changed their pattern of behavior and one seems not to have.

That isn't exonerating either for actions they took back then. It isn't saying either is blameless. It is saying that in the current situation, breaking a custody agreement is bad in general and very bad for the kids.

I never said I believed him or that his claims were true.

I believe they both have a lot of issues and that unless you actually know them everything is hearsay. I don’t think she is more sympathetic than he is nor vice versa. I don’t think him being single is a bad thing when you have two young daughters to look after. I also don’t think its bad that she remarried. Him suing her would be too petty and wouldn't be a good look for him. His best bet is to keep quiet. Airing her business just isn’t a good look no matter how you try to spin it. But at the end of the day there are 3 sides to a story and we have yet to hear the truth side.

For someone who is accusing the rest of us of seeing N through rose colored glasses you sure to seem to only want to talk about his potential good spots instead of acknowledging the myriad of issues he himself seems to have.

[Anonymous]

If both are in the wrong,
Isn’t it kid of disgusting how one of them has a nationally syndicated radio show and fan base? Especially when that person has three former female coworkers who have all made similar claims against him, and now his ex’s wife is making the same kind of claims?
Yet this person gets to talk on the radio everyday and mislead thousands. Imagine how many women would be triggered by hearing Natasha’s account of what happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If both are in the wrong,
Isn’t it kid of disgusting how one of them has a nationally syndicated radio show and fan base? Especially when that person has three former female coworkers who have all made similar claims against him, and now his ex’s wife is making the same kind of claims?
Yet this person gets to talk on the radio everyday and mislead thousands. Imagine how many women would be triggered by hearing Natasha’s account of what happened.

How is he misleading thousands if he's not talking about it....? Unlike N who posts about it every other day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^whoever you are, you really want us to know that she went to rehab. Regardless if it’s true, we get it. You want EVERYONE to know you think Natasha has a problem and went to court order rehab and is now clean. Completely unconfirmed at this point, but we here you.

Do you now feel validated?

Do you?

Why is it that you want to gloss over her past but make sure everyone knows Kane’s?

You seem to be totally brushing off an unbelievable invasion of privacy on his part while highlighting a negative thing about her. To me that says you are somehow on team Kane, because I, unconnected to both of them, see how both of them have issues but cannot imagine brushing such a psycho thing under the rug. If her account is true that is totally over the line insane.

Addiction is a disease. Hers (if true) was treated in a center after which she found a new partner, got married and had a healthy baby and has secured shared custody of her children. No 'disease' makes you spy on your wife via a home security system and then bring police over to intimidate her in front of your kids. Addiction is a serious thing, hers seems to be treated and under control. Sociopathic tendencies cannot be cured. So if I was picking one of these two flaws to talk about how its relevant to who they are and how they're acting today I would say what he did is much more relevant to today than what she did.

Not brushing anything off. Genuinely curious why you believe her? What actual proof do you have that all her claims are true? You clearly don’t believe his so why do you believe hers?

I think if she was lying he would have sued her by now. That is a big accusation and there haven't even been any Kane sympathizers on here denying that it happened.

I am curious why you believe him? What proof do you have that all of his claims are true? I believe that (if there is court decision evidence) if she had to go to rehab than she had a problem. I also believe that he has a big problem with women based on his long history with female cohosts and his decision to put his wife's personal problems on blast on his radio program.

So what information do we know fairly confidently?

1) Natasha at one point went to a court ordered rehab (I'm kind of taking your word on this that there is court evidence).
2) Kane has had numerous female cohosts quit or be pushed out due to conflicts with him
3) Natasha won back partial custody of the kids and is remarried with a new baby
4) No one on team Kane has denied her recent accusations
5) Previously cited former female cohosts have seemed sympathetic to Natasha.
6) Kane was at one point arrested for some type of domestic incident with Natasha.
7) Both have made questionable choices about the amount of information they share with the public regarding their relationship. IN MY OPINION, when he has done this it has been to humiliate her and when she has done this it has been in an effort to gain access to her children

What has been accused with no corroboration?

1) The crashing her car and parking it in the front yard accusation
2) The taking the kids and emptying the bank account and splitting to Florida accusation (by Kane of Natasha)
3) The extreme drug addiction to pain pills (I think personally there is a difference between someone with a chronic pain condition who needs to get treatment after being perscribed opioids and developing an issue and for example, someone hunting down oxy on the street to score)
4) Kane logged into security systems to spy on her when she was alone post separation

To me that shows a clearly dysfunctional relationship with two people that have a lot of fault. I also think there is a pattern of Kane treating women poorly. I think there is a pattern of Kane acting like women who clashed with him are 'crazy'. I think that Natasha appears to have changed a bit since 2015 or whatever. She's in a new stable marriage and has no problems maintaining custody of her son. Kane has not been in a stable relationship (not bad on it's own) and has continued to go through female cohosts (Mel). One seems to have changed their pattern of behavior and one seems not to have.

That isn't exonerating either for actions they took back then. It isn't saying either is blameless. It is saying that in the current situation, breaking a custody agreement is bad in general and very bad for the kids.

I never said I believed him or that his claims were true.

I believe they both have a lot of issues and that unless you actually know them everything is hearsay. I don’t think she is more sympathetic than he is nor vice versa. I don’t think him being single is a bad thing when you have two young daughters to look after. I also don’t think its bad that she remarried. Him suing her would be too petty and wouldn't be a good look for him. His best bet is to keep quiet. Airing her business just isn’t a good look no matter how you try to spin it. But at the end of the day there are 3 sides to a story and we have yet to hear the truth side.

For someone who is accusing the rest of us of seeing N through rose colored glasses you sure to seem to only want to talk about his potential good spots instead of acknowledging the myriad of issues he himself seems to have.

Umm ok? You can’t read so I can’t help you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If both are in the wrong,
Isn’t it kid of disgusting how one of them has a nationally syndicated radio show and fan base? Especially when that person has three former female coworkers who have all made similar claims against him, and now his ex’s wife is making the same kind of claims?
Yet this person gets to talk on the radio everyday and mislead thousands. Imagine how many women would be triggered by hearing Natasha’s account of what happened.

How is he misleading thousands if he's not talking about it....? Unlike N who posts about it every other day.

Agree.

So basically he shouldn’t work?

[Anonymous]

Why do people care so much about these two?
They’re long divorced, he’s still a douche, and she still has a blog. But the continual speculation from people on this thread is getting disqusting and disturbing.

[Anonymous]

Anyone follow Laura on Instagram? No idea what she was trying to say with her posts, but interesting timing....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone follow Laura on Instagram? No idea what she was trying to say with her posts, but interesting timing....

That John it’s a narc like Kane. And has some mental health problems??

[Anonymous]

Laura looks so much happier too. Good for her for letting go of that dirtbag

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^whoever you are, you really want us to know that she went to rehab. Regardless if it’s true, we get it. You want EVERYONE to know you think Natasha has a problem and went to court order rehab and is now clean. Completely unconfirmed at this point, but we here you.

Do you now feel validated?

Actually I was a new poster to this thread. My point is I understand why Kane wanted to be able to monitor at that point in time. That would be entirely inappropriate at this time assuming she’s in a healthy place.

Why don’t you understand that he had the girls? He was watching her when she was alone

[Anonymous]

Because this person has some friend whose sister knows the teacher the girls had in school that dated Peter. Or some rando connection like that.

[Anonymous]

Wow, we got some real Natasha haters in here

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone follow Laura on Instagram? No idea what she was trying to say with her posts, but interesting timing....

Link?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^whoever you are, you really want us to know that she went to rehab. Regardless if it’s true, we get it. You want EVERYONE to know you think Natasha has a problem and went to court order rehab and is now clean. Completely unconfirmed at this point, but we here you.

Do you now feel validated?

Actually I was a new poster to this thread. My point is I understand why Kane wanted to be able to monitor at that point in time. That would be entirely inappropriate at this time assuming she’s in a healthy place.

Why don’t you understand that he had the girls? He was watching her when she was alone

This. It absolutely shows the diabolical behavior going on. Creepy and disgusting. Natasha must have been at her wit's end to find out she was not only being terrorized by this person but he was watching her while she was home alone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^whoever you are, you really want us to know that she went to rehab. Regardless if it’s true, we get it. You want EVERYONE to know you think Natasha has a problem and went to court order rehab and is now clean. Completely unconfirmed at this point, but we here you.

Do you now feel validated?

Actually I was a new poster to this thread. My point is I understand why Kane wanted to be able to monitor at that point in time. That would be entirely inappropriate at this time assuming she’s in a healthy place.

Why don’t you understand that he had the girls? He was watching her when she was alone

This. It absolutely shows the diabolical behavior going on. Creepy and disgusting. Natasha must have been at her wit's end to find out she was not only being terrorized by this person but he was watching her while she was home alone.

Can someone explain how we know if this is actually true? Is there a police report or something?