Duggar son allegedly molested girls including sisters

[Anonymous]

I view the 14-year-old as much of a victim as his sisters. He was hardly raised in a healthy household.

I also wonder what people think should happen to a 14 year old who does this. There life should just be over in your book? 14 is still a child. 15 is still a child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I view the 14-year-old as much of a victim as his sisters. He was hardly raised in a healthy household.

I also wonder what people think should happen to a 14 year old who does this. There life should just be over in your book? 14 is still a child. 15 is still a child.

They should suffer consequences and be counseled. They should also be monitored so no one else becomes their victims... you know, like we do with sexual predators.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, learn to read. The poster had a link with a definition of rape included. That was a definition from the FBI, NOT the poster you keep saying is trying "redefine" the word.

If he did indeed insert his fingers into them, then, yes, it was rape...according to the FBI. Not just some internet loon.

The problem is I think the PP who keeps making light of rape and splitting hairs on semantics is an internet loon.

"She was in a short skirt, she asked for it" "We were out on a date, she owed me" "We are married, so it isn't rape."

I'm not making light of anything. I've been the victim of sexual assault before. I think it does a huge disservice to actual victims when you try to insert untrue facts and definitions for embellishment. There was no rape. Stop making stuff up. It makes you look overly dramatic and not in touch with reality.

Actual victims, eh?

Rape culture at its finest.

Yes, actual rape victims. Breast touching is not rape. Vulva touching is not rape. Ass grabbing is not rape.

This makes me sad.

Why does a distinction make you sad? I've been raped, and it isn't the same as being fondled. I find it incredibly offensive that you insist on lumping them together.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I view the 14-year-old as much of a victim as his sisters. He was hardly raised in a healthy household.

I also wonder what people think should happen to a 14 year old who does this. There life should just be over in your book? 14 is still a child. 15 is still a child.

They should suffer consequences and be counseled. They should also be monitored so no one else becomes their victims... you know, like we do with sexual predators.

What consequences should a 14-year-old CHILD suffer?

How should they be monitored? Put on a sex offender list, where they will never be able to hold a job or maybe even find a place to live?

I would not want this to happen to my brother because he touched my breast. Total overkill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, learn to read. The poster had a link with a definition of rape included. That was a definition from the FBI, NOT the poster you keep saying is trying "redefine" the word.

If he did indeed insert his fingers into them, then, yes, it was rape...according to the FBI. Not just some internet loon.

The problem is I think the PP who keeps making light of rape and splitting hairs on semantics is an internet loon.

"She was in a short skirt, she asked for it" "We were out on a date, she owed me" "We are married, so it isn't rape."

I'm not making light of anything. I've been the victim of sexual assault before. I think it does a huge disservice to actual victims when you try to insert untrue facts and definitions for embellishment. There was no rape. Stop making stuff up. It makes you look overly dramatic and not in touch with reality.

Actual victims, eh?

Rape culture at its finest.

Yes, actual rape victims. Breast touching is not rape. Vulva touching is not rape. Ass grabbing is not rape.

This makes me sad.

Why does a distinction make you sad? I've been raped, and it isn't the same as being fondled. I find it incredibly offensive that you insist on lumping them together.

You do realize you are replying to different people and not all the same right?

I haven't insisted that anything be lumped together.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, learn to read. The poster had a link with a definition of rape included. That was a definition from the FBI, NOT the poster you keep saying is trying "redefine" the word.

If he did indeed insert his fingers into them, then, yes, it was rape...according to the FBI. Not just some internet loon.

The problem is I think the PP who keeps making light of rape and splitting hairs on semantics is an internet loon.

"She was in a short skirt, she asked for it" "We were out on a date, she owed me" "We are married, so it isn't rape."

I'm not making light of anything. I've been the victim of sexual assault before. I think it does a huge disservice to actual victims when you try to insert untrue facts and definitions for embellishment. There was no rape. Stop making stuff up. It makes you look overly dramatic and not in touch with reality.

Actual victims, eh?

Rape culture at its finest.

Yes, actual rape victims. Breast touching is not rape. Vulva touching is not rape. Ass grabbing is not rape.

This makes me sad.

Why does a distinction make you sad? I've been raped, and it isn't the same as being fondled. I find it incredibly offensive that you insist on lumping them together.

Do you know they weren't digitally penetrated, which would make it rape by the FBI's definition, even if it's not PIV rape? I bet that having live with and serve the incestuous freak brother who molested or raped you and the cuckoo clock religious nutjob parents who blame you for seducing your brother and keep you in harm's way is no picnic. "Fondled" almost makes this sound light and happy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I view the 14-year-old as much of a victim as his sisters. He was hardly raised in a healthy household.

I also wonder what people think should happen to a 14 year old who does this. There life should just be over in your book? 14 is still a child. 15 is still a child.

They should suffer consequences and be counseled. They should also be monitored so no one else becomes their victims... you know, like we do with sexual predators.

What consequences should a 14-year-old CHILD suffer?

How should they be monitored? Put on a sex offender list, where they will never be able to hold a job or maybe even find a place to live?

I would not want this to happen to my brother because he touched my breast. Total overkill.

+1

I also think if a 14 year old molested/raped (whatever to that whacky pp and their semantics) their child they wouldn't be crying out that the predator was a CHILD.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PP, learn to read. The poster had a link with a definition of rape included. That was a definition from the FBI, NOT the poster you keep saying is trying "redefine" the word.

If he did indeed insert his fingers into them, then, yes, it was rape...according to the FBI. Not just some internet loon.

The problem is I think the PP who keeps making light of rape and splitting hairs on semantics is an internet loon.

"She was in a short skirt, she asked for it" "We were out on a date, she owed me" "We are married, so it isn't rape."

I'm not making light of anything. I've been the victim of sexual assault before. I think it does a huge disservice to actual victims when you try to insert untrue facts and definitions for embellishment. There was no rape. Stop making stuff up. It makes you look overly dramatic and not in touch with reality.

Actual victims, eh?

Rape culture at its finest.

Yes, actual rape victims. Breast touching is not rape. Vulva touching is not rape. Ass grabbing is not rape.

This makes me sad.

Why does a distinction make you sad? I've been raped, and it isn't the same as being fondled. I find it incredibly offensive that you insist on lumping them together.

Do you know they weren't digitally penetrated, which would make it rape by the FBI's definition, even if it's not PIV rape? I bet that having live with and serve the incestuous freak brother who molested or raped you and the cuckoo clock religious nutjob parents who blame you for seducing your brother and keep you in harm's way is no picnic. "Fondled" almost makes this sound light and happy.

+100

I also don't think the pp has experienced sexual assault, there is no way they would be spouting this shit if they had. If I am wrong then wow, do they need some more therapy and I am sorry for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I view the 14-year-old as much of a victim as his sisters. He was hardly raised in a healthy household.

I also wonder what people think should happen to a 14 year old who does this. There life should just be over in your book? 14 is still a child. 15 is still a child.

They should suffer consequences and be counseled. They should also be monitored so no one else becomes their victims... you know, like we do with sexual predators.

What consequences should a 14-year-old CHILD suffer?

How should they be monitored? Put on a sex offender list, where they will never be able to hold a job or maybe even find a place to live?

I would not want this to happen to my brother because he touched my breast. Total overkill.

So when your teenaged brother repeatedly comes into your five year old room when you are sleeping and ________, you'd for sure want him to be kept in the same house with you? Seriously, WTF is wrong with some of you? No one' swaying he should have been strung up. We're saying his parents should have actually reported it, gotten him help, gotten their girls help, untwisted their own sick minds, and dealt with it. If that meant Josh going to a foster home or juvenile detention, so fucking be it. To leave a criminal - and repeatedly touching your sisters is criminal - in a house with victims and potential victims is UNDERKILL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I view the 14-year-old as much of a victim as his sisters. He was hardly raised in a healthy household.

I also wonder what people think should happen to a 14 year old who does this. There life should just be over in your book? 14 is still a child. 15 is still a child.

They should suffer consequences and be counseled. They should also be monitored so no one else becomes their victims... you know, like we do with sexual predators.

What consequences should a 14-year-old CHILD suffer?

How should they be monitored? Put on a sex offender list, where they will never be able to hold a job or maybe even find a place to live?

I would not want this to happen to my brother because he touched my breast. Total overkill.

+1

I also think if a 14 year old molested/raped (whatever to that whacky pp and their semantics) their child they wouldn't be crying out that the predator was a CHILD.

So, what do you want done to him? Be specific. And are you willing to have that punishment done to your own son if he touched someone's breast?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I view the 14-year-old as much of a victim as his sisters. He was hardly raised in a healthy household.

I also wonder what people think should happen to a 14 year old who does this. There life should just be over in your book? 14 is still a child. 15 is still a child.

They should suffer consequences and be counseled. They should also be monitored so no one else becomes their victims... you know, like we do with sexual predators.

What consequences should a 14-year-old CHILD suffer?

How should they be monitored? Put on a sex offender list, where they will never be able to hold a job or maybe even find a place to live?

I would not want this to happen to my brother because he touched my breast. Total overkill.

+1

I also think if a 14 year old molested/raped (whatever to that whacky pp and their semantics) their child they wouldn't be crying out that the predator was a CHILD.

So, what do you want done to him? Be specific. And are you willing to have that punishment done to your own son if he touched someone's breast?

Josh Duggar, is that you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I view the 14-year-old as much of a victim as his sisters. He was hardly raised in a healthy household.

I also wonder what people think should happen to a 14 year old who does this. There life should just be over in your book? 14 is still a child. 15 is still a child.

They should suffer consequences and be counseled. They should also be monitored so no one else becomes their victims... you know, like we do with sexual predators.

What consequences should a 14-year-old CHILD suffer?

How should they be monitored? Put on a sex offender list, where they will never be able to hold a job or maybe even find a place to live?

I would not want this to happen to my brother because he touched my breast. Total overkill.

+1

I also think if a 14 year old molested/raped (whatever to that whacky pp and their semantics) their child they wouldn't be crying out that the predator was a CHILD.

So, what do you want done to him? Be specific. And are you willing to have that punishment done to your own son if he touched someone's breast?

14:10 and I already explained this a couple of time and included I would want the same for my son.

Not sure about what other posters think, but that is at least one example of an answer to a question you keep asking over and over.... even though it has been answered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I view the 14-year-old as much of a victim as his sisters. He was hardly raised in a healthy household.

I also wonder what people think should happen to a 14 year old who does this. There life should just be over in your book? 14 is still a child. 15 is still a child.

They should suffer consequences and be counseled. They should also be monitored so no one else becomes their victims... you know, like we do with sexual predators.

What consequences should a 14-year-old CHILD suffer?

How should they be monitored? Put on a sex offender list, where they will never be able to hold a job or maybe even find a place to live?

I would not want this to happen to my brother because he touched my breast. Total overkill.

+1

I also think if a 14 year old molested/raped (whatever to that whacky pp and their semantics) their child they wouldn't be crying out that the predator was a CHILD.

So, what do you want done to him? Be specific. And are you willing to have that punishment done to your own son if he touched someone's breast?

Josh Duggar, is that you?

LOL

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I view the 14-year-old as much of a victim as his sisters. He was hardly raised in a healthy household.

I also wonder what people think should happen to a 14 year old who does this. There life should just be over in your book? 14 is still a child. 15 is still a child.

They should suffer consequences and be counseled. They should also be monitored so no one else becomes their victims... you know, like we do with sexual predators.

What consequences should a 14-year-old CHILD suffer?

How should they be monitored? Put on a sex offender list, where they will never be able to hold a job or maybe even find a place to live?

I would not want this to happen to my brother because he touched my breast. Total overkill.

+1

I also think if a 14 year old molested/raped (whatever to that whacky pp and their semantics) their child they wouldn't be crying out that the predator was a CHILD.

So, what do you want done to him? Be specific. And are you willing to have that punishment done to your own son if he touched someone's breast?

Josh Duggar did more than just touch someone's breast. Jesus, you have some issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I view the 14-year-old as much of a victim as his sisters. He was hardly raised in a healthy household.

I also wonder what people think should happen to a 14 year old who does this. There life should just be over in your book? 14 is still a child. 15 is still a child.

They should suffer consequences and be counseled. They should also be monitored so no one else becomes their victims... you know, like we do with sexual predators.

What consequences should a 14-year-old CHILD suffer?

How should they be monitored? Put on a sex offender list, where they will never be able to hold a job or maybe even find a place to live?

I would not want this to happen to my brother because he touched my breast. Total overkill.

+1

I also think if a 14 year old molested/raped (whatever to that whacky pp and their semantics) their child they wouldn't be crying out that the predator was a CHILD.

So, what do you want done to him? Be specific. And are you willing to have that punishment done to your own son if he touched someone's breast?

He didn't just touch someone's breast once. He REPEATEDLY fondled genetalia on MULTIPLE victims when they were sleeping. I assume they woke up at some point during the fondling and were too shocked to do anything. And these are much younger girls, ages 5-12. He had reached puberty and was turned on by prepubescent children. This isn't "oh, he touched a breast". He did far more, to young children, when they are at the most vulnerable.
Sick. Yes, he should have to register for his entire life.