Another ICE Shooting in Minnesota

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hope all the anti-gun folks now understand why it is so important that are rights are not diminished. Please do not support further gun restrictions or there will no way to defend yourself when Trump x 2 comes into office 10 or 20 years from now. Protect your rights. Your life depends on it.

Citizens owning guns will not be able to defend themselves against an army of untrained thugs with unlimited funds, unlimited guns, unlimited government support. There are usually 15 to 20 of these people pounding on one person. There are enough videos that we know their routine. They pull people out of cars, slam them to the ground, don’t allow them to cooperate because they love pouncing like animals on the hunt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Armed community members have arrived on scene in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, to support ongoing protests against ICE and the Trump administration.

Via http://fn.tv

So lots of Kyle Rittenhouse folks. You MAGAs believe in this. This is what you advocate for!!!

Rittenhouse was at a riot, not a protest

He brandished a gun. Why wasn't he murdered for it? The ICU RN never once brandished his gun and was in the middle of helping a woman stand up.

Again, protesters should not be bringing guns to protests against ICE. That’s a recipe for disaster.

That is an opinion, and you are entitled to it, but it’s irrelevant here.

unless your Kyle Rittenhouse, and then it's fine.

Arming yourself as protection FROM protestors is not the same as arming yourself AS a protestor. Furthermore, Rittenhouse attempted to turn himself into the police, which is a far cry from protesting ICE or resisting arrest. He wasn’t an agitator, he was running from the agitators.
This comparison needs to stop being made. It’s absolutely silly.

And it’s you’re…

A. It is legal to carry a handgun on your person in Minnesota, either openly or concealed, provided you have a valid Minnesota Permit to Carry, which the victim had.
B. Define "protestor." All I saw was a guy standing on the sidewalk filming. Even if he were actively protesting, it is his First Amendment right to do so. Do you have a problem with that?
C. How is a guy peacefully filming at a distance from LEOs an "agitator"?

He also out his hand up and backed away when approached by the LEO. He was helping a woman stand up when they attacked him.

[Anonymous]

A doctor who witnessed the shooting submits a sworn declaration in federal litigation to halt ICE surge in MN:

"I did not see him attack the agents or brandish a weapon of any kind."

and

"The victim had at least three bullet wounds in his back."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Good.

[Anonymous]

Minnesota BCA was denied access to the crime scene. They got a WARRANT and DHS STILL BLOCKED THEM. So DHS doesn’t need a warrant to enter your house, but an actual warrant to enter the crime scene is denied?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Brought a gun to an ICE protest......What could go wrong? legal to carry or not?

What? the left is 2nd Amendment all of a sudden?

Somebody invites you to go duck hunting and you show up with an AR. Then you get outraged when somebody tells you it's the wrong tool for occasion... you act like its about the 2nd Amendment and not about you being a complete poseur.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The NRA has commented and they don’t agree with the feds.

Where do they not agree?

They also posted in opposition to something an administration official wrote about taking guns to protests.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He should have heeded the words to that Johnny Cash song, “Don’t Bring Your Guns To Town.”

Had not ICE acted correctly, the news may have been reporting the deaths of ICE agents, to which the leftists and anti-Americans would be clapping and cheering.

I see the new far-right talking points have arrived and they're...anti Second Amendment

Advising someone not to come armed and hot headed against experienced gunslingers is not anti-2nd Amendment.

Who was hot heated?

The nurse. His actions say, “I am mad, I am getting a gun and I am going to bring my brand of justice.” I fully believe ICE saved the lives of federal agents by pre-emptively eliminating this agitator and instigator.

Apparently helping a woman off the ground is terrifying to these people.

MAGA, do you know what nurses do for a living? They take care of injured people. The nurse was taking care of an injured person. A person injured by ICE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The NRA has commented and they don’t agree with the feds.

Where do they not agree?

They also posted in opposition to something an administration official wrote about taking guns to protests.

Exactly. They’re fence sitting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kyle Rittenhouse, anyone? Once upon a time, it was heroic to bring a gun to a protest, and to kill people with it as well. Now, just owning a gun apparently gives ICE the right to unload 10 bullets into you? Not even brandishing it; just owning it?

Only if you're not a MAGA.

+1 In the words of the authoritarian president of Peru Oscar Benevides: “For my friends, everything; for my enemies, the law.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brought a gun to an ICE protest......What could go wrong? legal to carry or not?

What? the left is 2nd Amendment all of a sudden?

Somebody invites you to go duck hunting and you show up with an AR. Then you get outraged when somebody tells you it's the wrong tool for occasion... you act like its about the 2nd Amendment and not about you being a complete poseur.

Not sure what the above is supposed to mean, but he had a permit to carry a concealed handgun and was doing so.

[Anonymous]

Please read this. The victim did nothing wrong.

[Anonymous]

We don't only have rhe Kyle Rittenhouse example. Proud boys love to protest with guns.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope all the anti-gun folks now understand why it is so important that are rights are not diminished. Please do not support further gun restrictions or there will no way to defend yourself when Trump x 2 comes into office 10 or 20 years from now. Protect your rights. Your life depends on it.

Citizens owning guns will not be able to defend themselves against an army of untrained thugs with unlimited funds, unlimited guns, unlimited government support. There are usually 15 to 20 of these people pounding on one person. There are enough videos that we know their routine. They pull people out of cars, slam them to the ground, don’t allow them to cooperate because they love pouncing like animals on the hunt.

The ICE budget is bigger than the Marines because of the Big Beautiful Bill. I’m all for the second amendment but there is no point in going that route with ICE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Armed community members have arrived on scene in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, to support ongoing protests against ICE and the Trump administration.

Via http://fn.tv

So lots of Kyle Rittenhouse folks. You MAGAs believe in this. This is what you advocate for!!!

Rittenhouse was at a riot, not a protest

He brandished a gun. Why wasn't he murdered for it? The ICU RN never once brandished his gun and was in the middle of helping a woman stand up.

Again, protesters should not be bringing guns to protests against ICE. That’s a recipe for disaster.

Again, what part of constitutional right do you not understand? If the government can kill you for exercising your right, it's not a right.