I am not Frank. I hope you have read the lawsuit. Neither of the items you mentioned are a restrictive covenant. |
Sure. Post the DMS. And then post your lawsuit. |
I request that you post the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CCRs) that grant the PY Homeowners Association (HOA) authority regarding bird feeders or holiday lighting. HOA board "We don't know if we can do it". https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CHGtDRw-kfqzjIfQ1q6dOr4k9ruRLG4K/view |
If it's just a parking space and not important to people, release them all to the common. No more assigned spaces. Should be cool, right? |
Homes without garages and driveways often sell for less per square foot, and I believe our HOA should be focused on maximizing home values rather than threatening residents who park in front of their homes with towing. |
Spot on. This is unbelievable. |
Just from the sentence construction, phraseology and vocabulary, any observant person could determine that there are several different people writing on this thread that support Frank, but are not Frank. I'm not Frank. |
You are self-described go-along-get-along, a yes-person, a sheep. Someone who will drink down that Koolaid and smack their lips. Probably also someone fighting to keep an illegally assigned parking space. At least Frank's fight is unbaised and about setting things right. And please stop with the "nobody joined the lawsuit" bullcrap - you cannot just "join" a lawsuit that someone else brought. There are a lot of complicated legal issues pertaining to legal representation and clients. Most HOA lawsuits are brought by individual owners for a reason: control over decision-making. |
You are so unbelievably and naively wrong! The reality is there are lawyers who would rather litigate because: 1) it brings in many more billable hours than reaching a quick settlement, 2) they want to try the same issues again, hoping the court will give them a different result because some minor detail in this case is different than a minor detail in a precedent case (another bullcrap excuse to litigate), 3) they are being paid with insurnace money, which apparently is not real money and (they rationalize) doesn't hurt anyone, and 4) the obvious strategy of trying to run the opposing party out of money. Don't judge the credibility of a lawsuit based on whether it is resolved by settlement. Only the credibility of the lawyers involved can be judged on that basis. |
Regarding joining a lawsuit, a class action lawsuit does not save you any money. |
And that Jeff would have nuked this thread ages ago if it was one dude sock puppeting. That's the best part and also a big clue as to how this will end. A whole bunch of reasonable individuals are in agreement that the confiscation of common area for the sole and exclusive use by a handful of individuals (Board members no less) is, to use a legal phrase, complete bull$hit. |
+1 It's like a really bad attempt at a comedy routine except people have to deal with this. PP it is clear the parking space you were given is more important to you than anything else in life. |
Imagine purchasing a $1.3 million townhome with a garage, only to be unlawfully told by your HOA that you cannot park in front of your own house. I believe this issue warrants news coverage, as it highlights potential overreach by HOAs and impacts homeowners' fundamental property rights. |
This is well beyond this "sane, level headed, reasonable resident of the community"'s ability to understand. This "sane" person will perish without their illegally gotten parking space. |
and the "sane, level headed, reasonable resident of the community who’s not a sociopath" 's posts are actually kind of humorous. Btw, he gets along with people "generally". |