Washington Post endorses Jennifer Wexton in 10th district.

[Anonymous]

They endorsed Comstock in 2016.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/jennifer-wexton-for-congress/2018/10/16/34cba456-d0a9-11e8-8c22-fa2ef74bd6d6_story.html?utm_term=.cb896001175f

[Anonymous]

Good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They endorsed Comstock in 2016.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/jennifer-wexton-for-congress/2018/10/16/34cba456-d0a9-11e8-8c22-fa2ef74bd6d6_story.html?utm_term=.cb896001175f

Wow, they did?

[Anonymous]

Who cares.

You should vote for who you feel is the better person. If you depend on the Post or any newspaper to determine what candidate is best, then you are a fool..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who cares.

You should vote for who you feel is the better person. If you depend on the Post or any newspaper to determine what candidate is best, then you are a fool..

Hi Barbara!

[Anonymous]

good choice

[Anonymous]

Well, duh. Of course WaPravda would oppose any Republican running for office since Trump came into office.

And, as for 2016, yes, WaPo did endorse Comstock because Comstock had done a great job; she had denounced Trump after the videos came to light; Trump had not yet won so Trump derangement syndrome had not set-in; and she was running against a carpetbagger whom no one remembers.

Nothingstanding what the ugly bullies say on this page, Barbara has done a great job and is not a Trumper.

[Anonymous]

Well, duh. Of course WaPravda would oppose any Republican running for office since Trump came into office.

And, as for 2016, yes, WaPo did endorse Comstock because Comstock had done a great job; she had denounced Trump after the videos came to light; Trump had not yet won so Trump derangement syndrome had not set-in; and she was running against a carpetbagger whom no one remembers.

Notwithstanding what the ugly bullies say on this page, Barbara has done a great job and is not a Trumper.

[Anonymous]

I agree the Post's endorsements are worthless (although I can't believe a Republican is trying to insult the Post by suggesting it is too Russian-- didn't you get the message from Trump that Putin is our best friend?) but Comstock has never opposed Trump or Ryan on anything meaningful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, duh. Of course WaPravda would oppose any Republican running for office since Trump came into office.

And, as for 2016, yes, WaPo did endorse Comstock because Comstock had done a great job; she had denounced Trump after the videos came to light; Trump had not yet won so Trump derangement syndrome had not set-in; and she was running against a carpetbagger whom no one remembers.

Nothingstanding what the ugly bullies say on this page, Barbara has done a great job and is not a Trumper.

“Carpetbagger”?

Virginia is so backwards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Notwithstanding what the ugly bullies say on this page, Barbara has done a great job and is not a Trumper.

Comstock votes with Trump 97.8% of the time.

[Anonymous]

"Comstock votes with Trump 97.8% of the time."

And 'resist'ers vote against Trump 100% of the time, even when it hurts America.

Comstock is the better choice, and despite the ads suggesting otherwise, she is an independent voice who tries to represent all of us.

[Anonymous]

Color me shocked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, duh. Of course WaPravda would oppose any Republican running for office since Trump came into office.

And, as for 2016, yes, WaPo did endorse Comstock because Comstock had done a great job; she had denounced Trump after the videos came to light; Trump had not yet won so Trump derangement syndrome had not set-in; and she was running against a carpetbagger whom no one remembers.

Nothingstanding what the ugly bullies say on this page, Barbara has done a great job and is not a Trumper.

I would think that Pravda would be very pro Trump given that he was the Russian's candidate of choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:"Comstock votes with Trump 97.8% of the time."

And 'resist'ers vote against Trump 100% of the time, even when it hurts America.

Comstock is the better choice, and despite the ads suggesting otherwise, she is an independent voice who tries to represent all of us.

Best laugh of the day so far.