Ruling on MCPS LGBT curriculum case coming this morning

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The message that mcps just sent out to staff and families shows that mcps continues to miss the point.
I’d really like to know who drafted it.
“Chilling”

I thought their message was fine. What's the problem with saying "It also sends a chilling message to many valued members of our diverse community"?

You are failing to see the issue here.

MCPS = LGBTQ lobby

Court simply said that parents have right to opt out. MCPS allows opt out for lots of things. It does nto send any message to LGBTQ community. Only a LGBTQ lobby group will interepret court ruling like that.

The other things kids were opting out for were for older kids, and they could sit quietly in a room by themselves, but five-year-olds can’t.

The ruling actually gave MCPS and now they don’t have to keep the kids in school and find something else for them to do. They can make them stay home.

Nobody is going to leave kids of any age unsupervised in school. Are you familiar with school today? Kids of all ages can get sent to the media center/library.

Exactly. It’s a perfect compromise. Everyone should be happy.

So why isn’t the left?

Actually, the left is quite happy. The religious bigots stay home when they’re teaching elementary kids about everyone.

They can’t be sent to the library when they’re five years old. The librarian isn’t just sitting there waiting for your bigoted child to show up.

Parents will be notified and they will keep their kids home and get an unexcused absence.

The best of both worlds.

This isn't how it'll work. Opt out kids get to stay in school while the teacher reads Playgirl and teaches them about sex changes

Not for elementary school they’re too young to be in a room by themselves and the county doesn’t have enough staff to babysit religious bigots.

So you’re gonna have to put your religion first and stay home with your children to save them.

Guess they’ll have to fire some of the overpaid administrators to pay for additional staff to provide alternate instruction for kids who opt out.

Nope. The ruling is you stay home and it’s an excused absence.

Congratulations you got what you asked for, you get to opt out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Justice Alito put the smackdown on MCPS.

He actually said a religious zealots stay home.. you can opt out, but you cannot get public school education à la carte. You can’t get babysitters to watch your kids so you can be a bigot.

Nah, he didn’t.

But you did make me laugh.😆

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Joint Statement from the Montgomery County Board of Education and Montgomery County Public Schools Concerning Today’s Supreme Court Decision

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued an opinion in the case of MAHMOUD ET AL. v. TAYLOR ET AL. concerning the use of LGBTQ+ texts and opt-out processes for families. Although not surprised, we are disappointed in today’s ruling. This decision complicates our work creating a welcoming, inclusive, and equitable school system. It also sends a chilling message to many valued members of our diverse community.


Montgomery County Public Schools remains a welcoming and inclusive school system that embraces and celebrates each and every one of our students. We will maintain an environment where all students feel valued and supported. Equity is one of our core values and is foundational to who we are as a system that serves one of the most diverse communities in the United States of America.

We will continue to analyze the Supreme Court decision and develop next steps in alignment with today’s decision and, as importantly, our values. Schools and families will receive further guidance prior to the start of the upcoming school year. MCPS will continue to have inclusive books, which reflect the rich diversity of the students and families that we serve in Montgomery County.

What is there to analyze? They lost. No loopholes

They need to create a list of days that you’re gonna have to keep your kids home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The message that mcps just sent out to staff and families shows that mcps continues to miss the point.
I’d really like to know who drafted it.
“Chilling”

I thought their message was fine. What's the problem with saying "It also sends a chilling message to many valued members of our diverse community"?

You are failing to see the issue here.

MCPS = LGBTQ lobby

Court simply said that parents have right to opt out. MCPS allows opt out for lots of things. It does nto send any message to LGBTQ community. Only a LGBTQ lobby group will interepret court ruling like that.

The other things kids were opting out for were for older kids, and they could sit quietly in a room by themselves, but five-year-olds can’t.

The ruling actually gave MCPS and now they don’t have to keep the kids in school and find something else for them to do. They can make them stay home.

Nobody is going to leave kids of any age unsupervised in school. Are you familiar with school today? Kids of all ages can get sent to the media center/library.

Exactly. It’s a perfect compromise. Everyone should be happy.

So why isn’t the left?

Actually, the left is quite happy. The religious bigots stay home when they’re teaching elementary kids about everyone.

They can’t be sent to the library when they’re five years old. The librarian isn’t just sitting there waiting for your bigoted child to show up.

Parents will be notified and they will keep their kids home and get an unexcused absence.

The best of both worlds.

This isn't how it'll work. Opt out kids get to stay in school while the teacher reads Playgirl and teaches them about sex changes

Not for elementary school they’re too young to be in a room by themselves and the county doesn’t have enough staff to babysit religious bigots.

So you’re gonna have to put your religion first and stay home with your children to save them.

Guess they’ll have to fire some of the overpaid administrators to pay for additional staff to provide alternate instruction for kids who opt out.

Nope. The ruling is you stay home and it’s an excused absence.

Congratulations you got what you asked for, you get to opt out.

Where does the ruling say that?

Hint: it doesn’t .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Joint Statement from the Montgomery County Board of Education and Montgomery County Public Schools Concerning Today’s Supreme Court Decision

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued an opinion in the case of MAHMOUD ET AL. v. TAYLOR ET AL. concerning the use of LGBTQ+ texts and opt-out processes for families. Although not surprised, we are disappointed in today’s ruling. This decision complicates our work creating a welcoming, inclusive, and equitable school system. It also sends a chilling message to many valued members of our diverse community.


Montgomery County Public Schools remains a welcoming and inclusive school system that embraces and celebrates each and every one of our students. We will maintain an environment where all students feel valued and supported. Equity is one of our core values and is foundational to who we are as a system that serves one of the most diverse communities in the United States of America.

We will continue to analyze the Supreme Court decision and develop next steps in alignment with today’s decision and, as importantly, our values. Schools and families will receive further guidance prior to the start of the upcoming school year. MCPS will continue to have inclusive books, which reflect the rich diversity of the students and families that we serve in Montgomery County.

Continue to have inclusive books? They did not learn that people don't want Uncle Bobby's bachelor wknd

The ruling specifically protected the curriculum from bigots and said religious zealots can just stay home

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The message that mcps just sent out to staff and families shows that mcps continues to miss the point.
I’d really like to know who drafted it.
“Chilling”

I thought their message was fine. What's the problem with saying "It also sends a chilling message to many valued members of our diverse community"?

You are failing to see the issue here.

MCPS = LGBTQ lobby

Court simply said that parents have right to opt out. MCPS allows opt out for lots of things. It does nto send any message to LGBTQ community. Only a LGBTQ lobby group will interepret court ruling like that.

The other things kids were opting out for were for older kids, and they could sit quietly in a room by themselves, but five-year-olds can’t.

The ruling actually gave MCPS and now they don’t have to keep the kids in school and find something else for them to do. They can make them stay home.

Nobody is going to leave kids of any age unsupervised in school. Are you familiar with school today? Kids of all ages can get sent to the media center/library.

Exactly. It’s a perfect compromise. Everyone should be happy.

So why isn’t the left?

Actually, the left is quite happy. The religious bigots stay home when they’re teaching elementary kids about everyone.

They can’t be sent to the library when they’re five years old. The librarian isn’t just sitting there waiting for your bigoted child to show up.

Parents will be notified and they will keep their kids home and get an unexcused absence.

The best of both worlds.

This isn't how it'll work. Opt out kids get to stay in school while the teacher reads Playgirl and teaches them about sex changes

Not for elementary school they’re too young to be in a room by themselves and the county doesn’t have enough staff to babysit religious bigots.

So you’re gonna have to put your religion first and stay home with your children to save them.

How does the county handle opt-outs for family life and human sexuality?

That is not taught in elementary school. This is specifically about elementary school.

Children over the age of eight can be left unattended, children under the age of eight cannot be

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Joint Statement from the Montgomery County Board of Education and Montgomery County Public Schools Concerning Today’s Supreme Court Decision

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued an opinion in the case of MAHMOUD ET AL. v. TAYLOR ET AL. concerning the use of LGBTQ+ texts and opt-out processes for families. Although not surprised, we are disappointed in today’s ruling. This decision complicates our work creating a welcoming, inclusive, and equitable school system. It also sends a chilling message to many valued members of our diverse community.


Montgomery County Public Schools remains a welcoming and inclusive school system that embraces and celebrates each and every one of our students. We will maintain an environment where all students feel valued and supported. Equity is one of our core values and is foundational to who we are as a system that serves one of the most diverse communities in the United States of America.

We will continue to analyze the Supreme Court decision and develop next steps in alignment with today’s decision and, as importantly, our values. Schools and families will receive further guidance prior to the start of the upcoming school year. MCPS will continue to have inclusive books, which reflect the rich diversity of the students and families that we serve in Montgomery County.

Continue to have inclusive books? They did not learn that people don't want Uncle Bobby's bachelor wknd

The ruling specifically protected the curriculum from bigots and said religious zealots can just stay home

It actually didn’t…don’t know what you’re reading. It protected the curriculum, but it didn’t say that the opt-outs have to stay home.

[Anonymous]

This is what you bigots don’t understand. There’s nothing wrong with the books that are being read to the elementary school children. The Supreme Court did not say these books should not be read to children.

With the Supreme Court said is that you can opt out just like other classes but if you’re in elementary school, it’s too much burden on the school to provide an alternate teacher to babysit your bigot children and now you must keep them home.

Good for them.

SCOTUS got it right. MCPS gets to keep their curriculum., non-bigoted children get to learn about all types of people, teachers don’t have to babysit your bigoted children, you keep them at home.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The message that mcps just sent out to staff and families shows that mcps continues to miss the point.
I’d really like to know who drafted it.
“Chilling”

I thought their message was fine. What's the problem with saying "It also sends a chilling message to many valued members of our diverse community"?

You are failing to see the issue here.

MCPS = LGBTQ lobby

Court simply said that parents have right to opt out. MCPS allows opt out for lots of things. It does nto send any message to LGBTQ community. Only a LGBTQ lobby group will interepret court ruling like that.

The other things kids were opting out for were for older kids, and they could sit quietly in a room by themselves, but five-year-olds can’t.

The ruling actually gave MCPS and now they don’t have to keep the kids in school and find something else for them to do. They can make them stay home.

Nobody is going to leave kids of any age unsupervised in school. Are you familiar with school today? Kids of all ages can get sent to the media center/library.

Exactly. It’s a perfect compromise. Everyone should be happy.

So why isn’t the left?

Actually, the left is quite happy. The religious bigots stay home when they’re teaching elementary kids about everyone.

They can’t be sent to the library when they’re five years old. The librarian isn’t just sitting there waiting for your bigoted child to show up.

Parents will be notified and they will keep their kids home and get an unexcused absence.

The best of both worlds.

This isn't how it'll work. Opt out kids get to stay in school while the teacher reads Playgirl and teaches them about sex changes

Not for elementary school they’re too young to be in a room by themselves and the county doesn’t have enough staff to babysit religious bigots.

So you’re gonna have to put your religion first and stay home with your children to save them.

Guess they’ll have to fire some of the overpaid administrators to pay for additional staff to provide alternate instruction for kids who opt out.

Nope. The ruling is you stay home and it’s an excused absence.

Congratulations you got what you asked for, you get to opt out.

Where does the ruling say that?

Hint: it doesn’t .

It doesn't. +1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is what you bigots don’t understand. There’s nothing wrong with the books that are being read to the elementary school children. The Supreme Court did not say these books should not be read to children.

With the Supreme Court said is that you can opt out just like other classes but if you’re in elementary school, it’s too much burden on the school to provide an alternate teacher to babysit your bigot children and now you must keep them home.

Good for them.

SCOTUS got it right. MCPS gets to keep their curriculum., non-bigoted children get to learn about all types of people, teachers don’t have to babysit your bigoted children, you keep them at home.

Been practicing law for 25 years. I read the entire opinion. It does not say this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The message that mcps just sent out to staff and families shows that mcps continues to miss the point.
I’d really like to know who drafted it.
“Chilling”

I thought their message was fine. What's the problem with saying "It also sends a chilling message to many valued members of our diverse community"?

You are failing to see the issue here.

MCPS = LGBTQ lobby

Court simply said that parents have right to opt out. MCPS allows opt out for lots of things. It does nto send any message to LGBTQ community. Only a LGBTQ lobby group will interepret court ruling like that.

The other things kids were opting out for were for older kids, and they could sit quietly in a room by themselves, but five-year-olds can’t.

The ruling actually gave MCPS and now they don’t have to keep the kids in school and find something else for them to do. They can make them stay home.

Nobody is going to leave kids of any age unsupervised in school. Are you familiar with school today? Kids of all ages can get sent to the media center/library.

Exactly. It’s a perfect compromise. Everyone should be happy.

So why isn’t the left?

Actually, the left is quite happy. The religious bigots stay home when they’re teaching elementary kids about everyone.

They can’t be sent to the library when they’re five years old. The librarian isn’t just sitting there waiting for your bigoted child to show up.

Parents will be notified and they will keep their kids home and get an unexcused absence.

The best of both worlds.

This isn't how it'll work. Opt out kids get to stay in school while the teacher reads Playgirl and teaches them about sex changes

Not for elementary school they’re too young to be in a room by themselves and the county doesn’t have enough staff to babysit religious bigots.

So you’re gonna have to put your religion first and stay home with your children to save them.

Guess they’ll have to fire some of the overpaid administrators to pay for additional staff to provide alternate instruction for kids who opt out.

Nope. The ruling is you stay home and it’s an excused absence.

Congratulations you got what you asked for, you get to opt out.

So, how does that work in ms or hs?

[Anonymous]

Don't you love how the progressive are spinning it as if they won? Morons.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Justice Alito put the smackdown on MCPS.

He actually said a religious zealots stay home.. you can opt out, but you cannot get public school education à la carte. You can’t get babysitters to watch your kids so you can be a bigot.

No he didn't. We see you posting over and over again. But you're wrong, sir. Now go back to your husband and enjoy your night of anal

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who really wants their kid to hang out with a trans kid anyway?

As long as they’re a good kid, I couldn’t care less.

But I still support this ruling.

I wouldn't. Speaks volumes to their parents who allow that nonsense. Bad people

I have no issue if my kid hangs out with trans kids and they do.

You will when your son hooks up with them

Here is where the bigotry comes in.. why would we care if our sons found somebody that loves them that is trans?

Bc it's gross

Hooking up with you is gross so…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is what you bigots don’t understand. There’s nothing wrong with the books that are being read to the elementary school children. The Supreme Court did not say these books should not be read to children.

With the Supreme Court said is that you can opt out just like other classes but if you’re in elementary school, it’s too much burden on the school to provide an alternate teacher to babysit your bigot children and now you must keep them home.

Good for them.

SCOTUS got it right. MCPS gets to keep their curriculum., non-bigoted children get to learn about all types of people, teachers don’t have to babysit your bigoted children, you keep them at home.

SCOTUS did not say it was too much of a burden so kids have to just stay home.

Why do you continue to lie?

What did MCPS do with the curriculum opt-outs before they were ended the opt-outs?